TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
Was it wrong though?Sorry but saying what you did is exactly what the anti-vaxxers try to say to avoid getting the shot.
Was it wrong though?Sorry but saying what you did is exactly what the anti-vaxxers try to say to avoid getting the shot.
Read my post and see why I don't agree - it was an oversimplification that is dangerous to those who would not be the 1%Was it wrong though?
That was a bad way to look a things from day 1. Was 9/11 no big deal because 99.999999% of Americans didn’t die?Without a vaccine, it is 99+ unlikely to die from covid, it least that’s what we were told.
I understand the point you are making but the car reference is a bad comparison. In fact when anyone say you have risk driving in the car.. it’s true.. but their are laws to keep you safer. It’s the law to obey speed limits.. law to wear a seatbelt.. laws for no distractions like texting while driving.. no getting behind the wheel if impaired in anyway etc. All these combined make it tougher for you to die when in a car. Do people still die? Of course.. breaking the laws is the main reason.. speeding.. drunk drivers.. not being able to put down the phone because you have to text etc.Sorry to hear about your friend, but nothing in life is 100% safe, it's all a question of risk. Every time you get in a car you are at risk of becoming a statistic.
I’m very sorry to read that.Tell that to my 20 year old friend who caught Covid and died within 2 weeks. Oh, they said, he's not at high risk. Now he's a statistic.
Sometimes, it's just your time.
Sorry to hear about your friend, but nothing in life is 100% safe, it's all a question of risk.
I bet you did do this actually.The car analogy is fair, every time I get in my car it could lead to an accident and potentially death but I can tell you with 100% certainty if there was a shot or a device I could use that made it 95% unlikely I’d be injured in an accident and 99%+ unlikely to die I’d take it in a heartbeat.
I agree and have been quite surprised at the number of people who elect not to take a safe and simple step to minimize their risk.Of course this is true, but with Covid there’s a vaccine that makes you 95% unlikely to even get sick if exposed and 99%+ unlikely to die. All you need to do is take 2 shots that combined take about 90 seconds to get. The car analogy is fair, every time I get in my car it could lead to an accident and potentially death but I can tell you with 100% certainty if there was a shot or a device I could use that made it 95% unlikely I’d be injured in an accident and 99%+ unlikely to die I’d take it in a heartbeat.
We do but we could make driving almost 100% safe. We just aren't willing to make the trade offs in comfort, efficiency and cost. The crash that Ryan Newman survived last year at the Daytona 500 shows that vehicles can be made nearly 100% safe in any normal driving situation. We just aren't willing to wear helmets and five point harnesses, get 10 MPG and pay more for a safety cage.I bet you did do this actually.
Are you driving a car from before 1968 with no seat belts?
Maybe that’s to far, perhaps a 1980 Pinto?
Maybe something newer than 1999 with air bags required?
How about crumple zones?
I bet you have a car with automatic emergency braking too. Soon to be required for all cars.
We do all kinds of things to make driving safer every year.
Continuing to mask and distance until the percentage goes up is also a “safe and simple step” to minimize risk and yet many get extremely hostile at the very suggestion.I agree and have been quite surprised at the number of people who elect not to take a safe and simple step to minimize their risk.
There's no reason to continue to take those steps since the vaccine is available with no wait or hoops to jump through to anybody who wants to protect themselves. This has been the case for a couple of months now.Continuing to mask and distance until the percentage goes up is also a “safe and simple step” to minimize risk and yet many get extremely hostile at the very suggestion.
Saving lives would be a reason.There's no reason to continue to take those steps since the vaccine is available with no wait or hoops to jump through to anybody who wants to protect themselves. This has been the case for a couple of months now.
Saving lives would be a reason.
70% of the population vaccinated would probably be my threshold if I was solely going to determine the rules.So what would your deaths per day threshold be for not wearing masks anymore?
The people who's lives would be saved are 99% people who choose not to get vaccinated and protect themselves.Saving lives would be a reason.
I'm glad you're not making the rules. We may never get to 70% of the population vaccinated.70% of the population vaccinated would probably be my threshold if I was solely going to determine the rules.
Why should the vaccinated have to continue to suffer because of the actions of the unvaccinated? The vaccine is safe and available- anyone eligible choosing not to receive it at this point is rolling the dice and playing a “lottery with death” as the governor of West Virginia put it.70% of the population vaccinated would probably be my threshold if I was solely going to determine the rules.
The people who's lives would be saved are 99% people who choose not to get vaccinated and protect themselves.
I'm glad you're not making the rules. We may never get to 70% of the population vaccinated.
I have a friend that said she will not get the Covid shot because of how many people who died from the shot. I think it works both ways.Tell that to my 20 year old friend who caught Covid and died within 2 weeks. Oh, they said, he's not at high risk. Now he's a statistic.
How many was it?I have a friend that said she will not get the Covid shot because of how many people who died from the shot. I think it works both ways.
1. I don’t think wearing a mask in crowded public settings is suffering.Why should the vaccinated have to continue to suffer because of the actions of the unvaccinated?
We’ll have to agree to disagree about 1 (I was happy to do it before I was fully vaccinated, lest you think I’m one of the loons), but regarding 2, I think you’re right. Even if a small percentage of parents choose to vaccinate their children under 12, it’ll easily push the country over 70%, probably even 75%, though I don’t think it’ll get much higher than that. Too many people are way too entrenched on the anti-vaxx side.1. I don’t think wearing a mask in crowded public settings is suffering.
2. Children can’t be vaccinated yet. Pretty sure once children can be vaccinated and we get full FDA approval we can get pretty close to 70%. Just my guess of course.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.