Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

mmascari

Well-Known Member
I guarantee there will be a **** load of people who get vaccinated once they’re told that vaccinated people can return to a 2019 lifestyle
They’ve been told, clearly it doesn’t matter.

It was pointed out a hundred plus pages ago “Enough vaccinated, we get back to normal, lose masks”. Because it’s not INSTANT RIGHT NOW, not bothering to get vaccinated will not speed it up, only delay it. So, yes, they’ve been told, get vaccinated we'll get back to normal, and it hasn’t mattered at all.

I completely agree. If the CDC and governments overall would set goals to lift restrictions then people in general would be more trusting. But continually moving the goal posts makes it seem like they’re shady and not to be trusted. Which is why a lot of the people I know won’t get a vaccine
The end goal hasn’t moved since day 1. There have been additional intermediate goals. But eliminating/reducing widespread community spread has always been the goal. There mostly hasn’t been an exact number for that, but even here, nobody thinks we’re there yet. Nobody thinks it’s 0 either.

Recently, there have been a few communities with explicit vaccinated percentage goals. These are a proxy for reduced spread based on enough vaccinated reducing community spread.

Still doesn’t seem to matter.

The only conclusion is that people actively fighting getting vaccinated, or demanding restrictions removed while spread is still high, just don’t care about the community.
 

ColeTrain04

Active Member
We're telling you the facts as to why what you want doesn't work - it has nothing to do with beliefs. You just don't like it.
What facts have you provided me? I’m not arguing that masks don’t slow the spread, the absolutely do. But clear goals and incentives will definitely make more people get vaccinated. What’s evidence is there to suggest that vaccinated people spread the virus? What evidence exists that you’re at a risk of contracting the virus after being vaccinated? Breakthrough infections are extremely rare and even less fatal. Also why after I’m vaccinated do I no longer need to quarantine after exposure? Wouldn’t that suggest I’m not a risk of asymptotic spread? Also cloth masks don’t prevent spread of an airborne virus. They definitely help but they aren’t anywhere near 100% effective. Also CDC says that for every 1 case that’s diagnosed there are 2-3 that get missed. That means between 100-120 million people in the us have a natural immunity to the virus. Top that with the 200+ million vaccines that have been administered and you can see why cases and deaths are down 80% since January. I’m not being unreasonable it’s literally what the science says. You want more vaccines? Find better ways to incentivize younger people to get them. It’s common sense. They’re clearly not scared of it so the CDC trying to tell them that there is “impending doom” on the horizon because of variants isn’t going to work. Then the CDC wants to say that the vaccines are very effective against known variants. So which is it? Impending doom because of variants or the vaccines are effective?
 

ColeTrain04

Active Member
So if your goal is to force businesses to do something than sure it’s a win, but for the businesses it’s a nightmare. Not sure why we can’t just make a goal of percent vaccinated and when we hit it the rules are relaxed. Then we accomplish #1 without having to endure #2. The poor CMs and workers in other businesses have been through enough we don’t need to set them up for more conflict. It’s not too difficult.
I’m all for that idea. But Disney is hush hush on their plans. Maybe they should consider changing that?
 

ColeTrain04

Active Member
They’ve been told, clearly it doesn’t matter.

It was pointed out a hundred plus pages ago “Enough vaccinated, we get back to normal, lose masks”. Because it’s not INSTANT RIGHT NOW, not bothering to get vaccinated will not speed it up, only delay it. So, yes, they’ve been told, get vaccinated we'll get back to normal, and it hasn’t mattered at all.


The end goal hasn’t moved since day 1. There have been additional intermediate goals. But eliminating/reducing widespread community spread has always been the goal. There mostly hasn’t been an exact number for that, but even here, nobody thinks we’re there yet. Nobody thinks it’s 0 either.

Recently, there have been a few communities with explicit vaccinated percentage goals. These are a proxy for reduced spread based on enough vaccinated reducing community spread.

Still doesn’t seem to matter.

The only conclusion is that people actively fighting getting vaccinated, or demanding restrictions removed while spread is still high, just don’t care about the community.
I care very much about my community. We both want the same thing. And what number is considered high community spread? 240k infections a day or 43k infections a day? It’s relative. Seems to me that more people were wearing masks and following guidelines over the winter, at least that’s what I’ve noticed where I am. Yet cases are still declining. So what’s the number? Nobody has said. Maybe public health officials should try and set clear goals.
 

ImperfectPixie

Well-Known Member
What facts have you provided me? I’m not arguing that masks don’t slow the spread, the absolutely do. But clear goals and incentives will definitely make more people get vaccinated. What’s evidence is there to suggest that vaccinated people spread the virus? What evidence exists that you’re at a risk of contracting the virus after being vaccinated? Breakthrough infections are extremely rare and even less fatal. Also why after I’m vaccinated do I no longer need to quarantine after exposure? Wouldn’t that suggest I’m not a risk of asymptotic spread? Also cloth masks don’t prevent spread of an airborne virus. They definitely help but they aren’t anywhere near 100% effective. Also CDC says that for every 1 case that’s diagnosed there are 2-3 that get missed. That means between 100-120 million people in the us have a natural immunity to the virus. Top that with the 200+ million vaccines that have been administered and you can see why cases and deaths are down 80% since January. I’m not being unreasonable it’s literally what the science says. You want more vaccines? Find better ways to incentivize younger people to get them. It’s common sense. They’re clearly not scared of it so the CDC trying to tell them that there is “impending doom” on the horizon because of variants isn’t going to work. Then the CDC wants to say that the vaccines are very effective against known variants. So which is it? Impending doom because of variants or the vaccines are effective?
Now you're trying to change the argument. This isn't difficult to understand.

Currently, the vaccines are effective against the known variants. The longer the virus is spreading, the more opportunity it has to mutate to being vaccine resistant. Those not getting vaccinated are keeping the virus spreading in the community, thus providing more opportunity to the virus for mutation. The vaccine CAN be quickly tweaked to address this if it occurs, but then we're back at square one requiring everyone to go get shots again.

We absolutely need to incentivize people to get vaccinated. Removing mask and distancing mandates NOW isn't the way to do it.
 

ColeTrain04

Active Member
Now you're trying to change the argument. This isn't difficult to understand.

Currently, the vaccines are effective against the known variants. The longer the virus is spreading, the more opportunity it has to mutate to being vaccine resistant. Those not getting vaccinated are keeping the virus spreading in the community, thus providing more opportunity to the virus for mutation. The vaccine CAN be quickly tweaked to address this if it occurs, but then we're back at square one requiring everyone to go get shots again.

We absolutely need to incentivize people to get vaccinated. Removing mask and distancing mandates NOW isn't the way to do it.
so what’s the incentive? When lifting all mask mandates would raise the vaccination substantially according to polls. Having to wear a mask after vaccination is the #1 reason people don’t want to get it.
 

DisneyFan32

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
Now you're trying to change the argument. This isn't difficult to understand.

Currently, the vaccines are effective against the known variants. The longer the virus is spreading, the more opportunity it has to mutate to being vaccine resistant. Those not getting vaccinated are keeping the virus spreading in the community, thus providing more opportunity to the virus for mutation. The vaccine CAN be quickly tweaked to address this if it occurs, but then we're back at square one requiring everyone to go get shots again.

We absolutely need to incentivize people to get vaccinated. Removing mask and distancing mandates NOW isn't the way to do it.
Wait until a couple months (September or October) to remove masks and social distancing, my state NJ may remove masks by August/September. Is that really gonna happen for vaccine resistant if variants gets worse or not?
 

carolina_yankee

Well-Known Member
As soon as the Biden administration says it's safe to no longer wear masks indoors, most businesses will quickly end their mask requirements.

A company trying to enforce a mask mandate once the Federal government says it's safe is only going to result in a lot of unhappy customers and employees.

People will continue to wear masks, if they wish, but masks are not popular among most Americans.

Once the CDC says it’s safe to not wear masks indoors (which is the agency that would say it at the Federal level), then people should only wear masks if they want to. Like others, I’m hoping if people are feeling poorly or it’s flu season, there will be more masking than pre-pandemic, but as long as their isn’t a public health emergency, it should be personal choice.
 

ColeTrain04

Active Member
Now you're trying to change the argument. This isn't difficult to understand.

Currently, the vaccines are effective against the known variants. The longer the virus is spreading, the more opportunity it has to mutate to being vaccine resistant. Those not getting vaccinated are keeping the virus spreading in the community, thus providing more opportunity to the virus for mutation. The vaccine CAN be quickly tweaked to address this if it occurs, but then we're back at square one requiring everyone to go get shots again.

We absolutely need to incentivize people to get vaccinated. Removing mask and distancing mandates NOW isn't the way to do it.
also I’d still like the quarantine questioned answered.
Wait until a couple months (September or October) to remove masks and social distancing, my state NJ may remove masks by August/September. Is that really gonna happen for vaccine resistant if variants gets worse or not?
here’s my fear with that. As we get into fall and winter there will more than likely be an uptick in cases. If that happens I fear more people will be reluctant to follow guidelines because they have no trust in the government. We need to relax them now so that if they need to be reimplemented more people will be willing to comply with them.
 

ImperfectPixie

Well-Known Member
so what’s the incentive? When lifting all mask mandates would raise the vaccination substantially according to polls. Having to wear a mask after vaccination is the #1 reason people don’t want to get it.
Take that up with the people who have been flaunting the mandates from the start. They're a big part of the problem.

NJ is doing shot and a beer.
There's a restaurant guy in DC who is giving out $50 gift certificates.

We need more businesses to get on board to offer a wide variety of incentives.
 

DisneyFan32

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
also I’d still like the quarantine questioned answered.

here’s my fear with that. As we get into fall and winter there will more than likely be an uptick in cases. If that happens I fear more people will be reluctant to follow guidelines because they have no trust in the government. We need to relax them now so that if they need to be reimplemented more people will be willing to comply with them.
Nooo...Will I need mask for fall/winter is masks and social distancing is staying for fall/winter.....is really gonna happen if there be an uptick in cases by fall/winter?
 

LaughingGravy

Well-Known Member
They’re clearly not scared of it so the CDC trying to tell them that there is “impending doom” on the horizon because of variants isn’t going to work. Then the CDC wants to say that the vaccines are very effective against known variants. So which is it? Impending doom because of variants or the vaccines are effective?
The longer we let the spread of the known variants stick around, the greater the opportunity to have more and mutate, eventually creating a much more difficult one to fight.
If we don't nip the variants, as in contain them to not spread with the help of more vaccinations, this could be possibly much more deadly. It is both.
We have gotten this far with some good results, but do we want to finish the job, or not?
 

DisneyDebRob

Well-Known Member
We HAVE to worry about whether people are being vaccinated or not. If not enough people get vaccinated and virus mutates and renders the vaccines ineffective, we're all back at square one, thanks to a minority of people who wouldn't do what needed to be done.
Why is what you said in this post the hardest thing I believe for people to comprehend?
 

DisneyFan32

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
I don't want Square One to be really happen if vaccine resistant is really happen if virus mutating....:eek: is really gonna happen or not....is there will be no more masks by fall/winter?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom