Disney Experience
Well-Known Member
That is an informative Moderna tweak article you linked. (https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/tiny-tweak-behind-COVID-19/98/i38)For everyone else to be aware...
What is included in the vaccines is NOT a full SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Apparently, an actual SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, shapeshifts from a small stubby, into a long pointy thing that forces itself into cells. Geneticists figured out how to stabilize the protein in its pre-change state, before using it in the vaccine, based on previous research done with other viruses. The thing that makes the spike protein so destructive, is the thing the vaccine is designed to prevent from occurring. Bruce Banner vs the Hulk. The vaccine is the Bruce version, the virus has the Hulk version. And now conspiracy theorists are going to use the thing that makes the vaccine work as the reason why the vaccine is dangerous.
This is a story about the Moderna tweak.
The study itself includes discussion about how the vaccines are effective at preventing endothelial damage.
I liked it.
Now concerning the other study (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.04.409144v1.full.pdf)
I agree it does not directly address the modified S protein in the vaccine:, other than saying the protection it may infer would decrease the potential of actual covid virus load and therefore actual covid virus damage. (i.e. getting vaccinated is good) Quote from study:
This conclusion suggests that vaccinationgenerated antibody and/or exogenous antibody against S protein not only protects the host from SARS-CoV-2 infectivity but also inhibits S protein-imposed endothelial injury and ultimately decrease cardiovascular complication-associated mortality in COVID-19 patients.
It seems it is still not peered reviewed and was made available in early December 2020. But I may just be seeing older pdfs of the paper online. Assuming the results of the study are correct, the study did not study the effects of any specific vaccine (MRNA or otherwise) modified S protein,
What the study looked at was a virus with the covid S (Spike) protein that is not modified and therefore can bind (and the spike (S protien) becomes a post translational version of the Spike protien).
So to quote the study:
I would think (and I am just a layman) that the vaccines spike which does not have the ability to transform into the post-translational state (i.e. bind) is not addressed by the study itself (Other than the advantage of being vaccinated will stop the real virus and the post translational damage of the real virus spike). It seems unlikely from the study results that a pre-transformed S protein will be the cause of the damage they found in the study, if (like in the MRNA vaccines) the protein is locked in the pre-transformed shape. (As was described in the other article you linked)Our data herein reveals that S protein alone can damage endothelium, manifested by impaired mitochondrial function and eNOS activity but increased glycolysis. The S proteinmediated endothelial impairment depends on ACE2 post-translational modifications.
Now if they had injected the vaccine into the hamsters and got the results they got, it would be a different conclusion.
But out in the internet I think people see the first sentence which I quoted from the study and do not realize it applies only if the protein is in a post-translational form; and the MRNA vaccine generated spikes cannot transform to that form because they have been modified to be "stable" ie not transform.
Last edited: