Chip Chipperson
Well-Known Member
I understand your point, but there are other factors involved. For one, Florida has an older population than California, which would contribute to more deaths.
Overall, yes CA is "slightly" lower on a few of those metrics, but it still is fascinating to see how completely different approaches almost ended up with similar results. One thing that has changed my opinion since are lockdowns. Don't want to de-rail here but lockdowns work of course when they are occurring, but whenever you open up slightly there is always an untick, so long-term we know they don't work.
This is all really a crazy experiment and I am curious to see the data and studies of the effects of the actions we took after this thing is squashed.
Sure there are other factors. My point was that the poster I replied to ignored all of them - especially total population when discussing the total cases in each state. However, FL having an older population shouldn't make a difference in the cases per million and it is virtually guaranteed that the elevated case count contributed to the higher death count when compared to CA.
Meanwhile, TX has a population density that is less than half of CA's yet they have higher cases per million and deaths per million. Factoring in population density makes TX look much worse than CA (and worse than FL, too, for that matter).