disneygeek90
Well-Known Member
I had a boarding group that was called like an hour after I got the shotI’m surprised you were able to stay off of ROTR long enough to get 2 shots
I had a boarding group that was called like an hour after I got the shotI’m surprised you were able to stay off of ROTR long enough to get 2 shots
Not the least bit surprising.How Y’all, Youse and You Guys Talk
What does the way you speak say about where you’re from? Answer all the questions below to see your personal dialect map.www.nytimes.com
Take that quiz, it's quite fun
Or we could sell it to them.I don't. All that AstraZeneca the US is just sitting there why not donate it to other countries if you aren't going to use it.
We can't do anything with extra vaccine thanks to the former occupant. He explicitly wrote into the contracts with the vaccine makers we can't share any extra.Or we could sell it to them.
They have donated some to Canada alreadyOr we could sell it to them.
The UK has focused more on first shots and that’s the main reason they have a higher percentage of 1st shots done. The US is ahead in completed vaccinations done. As usual, you are twisting multiple arguments. You said the US is falling behind the pace of vaccinations in the UK but that’s factually inaccurate. Our pace right now is higher adjusted for population size. What decline in pace in the US? Our 7 day daily average of vaccinations has been increasing and hasn’t fallen off despite the JnJ pause. You are attempting to paint a narrative that doesn’t fit with reality.Yet --- Cases have fallen MUCH more significantly in the UK. And UK is hitting vaccination rates of 95%+ among eligible groups.
Yes, the pace will decline in the UK -- as they hit 95%. For us, the decline in pace is happening at a much lower vaccination rate.
So again -- why are cases falling so much more in the UK and then US?
Because they are achieving higher vaccination rates and because they are simultaneously mitigating.
We should see soon enough if the cases continue to trend down.You're right, it is easing up. I have not paid attention to the timeline.
My point still stands that there *was* a recent strict lockdown in the UK that is now beginning to ease a bit.
It's nice to see someone so concerned about the health and well-being of refugees.With all the concern about variants, where is the concern about the refugees being allowed and then released into the country without being tested for Covid? Please note that this is not anti-immagration. Not about race, not politics or anything other than the protocols/orders of the CDC which are the guidelines we've been instructed to follow.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued an Order on January 12, 2021 requiring proof of a negative COVID-19 test or documentation of having recovered from COVID-19 for all people arriving from foreign countries.
It seems there are two separate set of rules for citizens and non citizens. The virus does not discriminate, yet the rules (orders) do? If I travel outside of the country, I need to test negative and/or recover before I return. A person crossing the border illegally does not.
And it's been pointed out countless times in this thread that "super spreader" events of people gathering together are a big reason that this pandemic "rages" on. But the pictures of hundreds of detained refugees, many without masks or social distancing (literally laying on top of one another) being grouped together for days/weeks and then being released into the country without being tested for Covid doesn't seem to bother anybody.
Again, this isn't about politics or immigration. No need to report this post, (which I bet several of you already have) Just curious about the lack of concern here. Curious about how we prevent the virus from spreading on regards to this "super spreader " issue.
It’s not proof for you because HIPAA, but.... last month I emergently intubated a 38 year old Ironman athlete in the ICU. He passed 2 weeks later. Young and healthy gives you good odds, but bad outcomes with covid still far outnumber bad outcomes with the vaccine
30-39 years | 5,683 |
The difference in new cases in CA and FL is really startling.
I think it would be very difficult for the federal government to issue such a mandate and not have it struck down by the Supreme Court. Individual states would have a better chance of doing so successfully due to existing precedent, but not enough of them would be willing to do so to make a difference.
The federal government could do something like levy a special tax on anyone who doesn't get the vaccine -- that way a person wouldn't actually be forced to do so, but would suffer consequences for their choice -- but I don't think that's very likely to happen.
Yes! I stupidly forgot that 100% agree!Agreed 99.9%
To add: NO EPCOT MONORAIL
We should see soon enough if the cases continue to trend down.
The difference in new cases in CA and FL is really startling.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.