Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

danlb_2000

Premium Member
With the concerns about facial recognition, magic bans being old technology and anything that requires touching surfaces (i.e. fingerprint scans) because of COVID19 I am surprised the imagineers have not turned to retina scanning. One retina scan at registration time (simply stare into a scanning device) w no physical contact w anything. Voila! To get into your room simply take your glasses off and look at the scanner, to enter a park just look at the scanner, oh yea, link a credit card to your retina scan and when paying for something simply look at the scanner. No touching, secure and specific to each individual. Just a thought.

I never understood the concern about fingerprint scanners. You are touching so many other surfaces in the park, one finger on a scanner is hardly going to make a difference.
 

DCBaker

Premium Member
"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday revised its guidance on social distancing in schools, saying most students can now sit three feet apart instead of six feet so long as they are wearing masks.

The recommendation is for all K-12 students, regardless of whether community transmission is low, moderate or substantial, the CDC said.

In communities where transmission is high, the CDC recommends that middle school and high school students remain at least six feet apart if schools aren’t able to keep students and teachers in assigned groups, the agency said. In elementary schools, where younger children have been shown to be at less risk of transmitting the virus than teens, kids can stay safe at three feet apart with masks, the CDC said.

The CDC said it continues to recommend at least six feet distance between adults in schools and between adults and students. It also still recommends six feet social distancing in common areas, when eating, during in-door activities, such as band practice and sports, and in settings outside of the classroom.

“CDC is committed to leading with science and updating our guidance as new evidence emerges,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in a statement. “Safe in-person instruction gives our kids access to critical social and mental health services that prepare them for the future, in addition to the education they need to succeed.”

The updated guidance from federal health officials comes after a study published last week in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases suggested public schools could safely reopen as long as kids were three feet apart and other mitigation measures, such as wearing masks, were enforced.

Some schools had complained that maintaining a six feet rule was not feasible. The World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics have both OK’d three feet social distancing. White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said Thursday that shortened social guidelines would “likely” happen."


 

Chi84

Premium Member
This is how I’m viewing the Summer with my kids. I’m hoping that if enough people 12+ get the vaccine by the end of the school year we can have a mostly normal Summer since the kids under 12 are lower risk and cases overall should be way down. The one thing that does give me pause is that the article only focuses on hospitalization and death. I agree that the biggest benefit of the vaccines is that they should reduce or eliminate the surge in serious illness, but that doesn’t mean I don’t care if my kid gets ill as long as they don’t end up on a ventilator or dead. I get my kids a flu shot every year to try to avoid them getting the flu and miss school and feel generally bad not just because I’m worried they will die from the flu. I have a trip to WDW planned for August. I have no issue going if my youngest son isn’t vaccinated if the case numbers look good by then. I would not feel comfortable going if cases are still surging in FL or nationwide. If my son (or anyone vaccinated) gets sick and feels bad for a large portion of my trip that’s going to ruin the vacation and it’s not exactly a cheap trip. I think a lot of families with kids will look at the situation and decide on traveling based on that. Many will still go (many went before there was a vaccine).
No one wants their kid to get sick, but there's a difference between the government limiting their activities because of a pandemic and a parent doing so voluntarily because they don't want to deal with illness. I think the point of the articles I've been reading is that kids are much, much less likely to get sick. There will always be a chance of illness, and that chance is magnified because of COVID. The issue is what this means in terms of public health policy - individual decisions about vacations at this time will always rest with the parents.
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
It’s no different than any of these Covid debates. Paul doesn’t want to wear a mask. It’s selfish and against the public good. Period. Instead of doing what he knows is right he’s blowing that dog whistle for the anti-mask crowd and demanding to see the “scientific proof” he needs to wear a mask. We are a few months away from having the majority vaccinated. People like him turning vaccination into a political issue are really hurting the cause. When you rail on about how people who are vaccinated aren‘t getting a benefit they should it makes some people less willing to get vaccinated.
Paul's neighbor had the correct read on him long ago. Some people are just one
 

MaryJaneP

Well-Known Member
The article from the Atlantic, included in GoofGoof's post above, is from an economist, not a known medical specialist. In the article, even she notes the CDC will likely continue recommending masks as, and to quote her from the article, "It will continue to recommend masks, for the sake of protecting the unvaccinated population, because the science on transmission by the vaccinated is still hazy." One way to read this is to cautiously begin small gatherings while remaining vigilant and continuing to use some mitigation suggestions. If the transmission by vaccinated is hazy, what is the science on transmission by Covid-19 survivors?

As to why try schools yet this year, we see just about every other effort mock-up or test stuff before going forward full bore. Maybe trying the schools this spring, even if it is for only a few months or even weeks, is to help identify problems and work on solutions prior to a full return to school in August or September. Not sure that is what they are thinking but a trial run now seems to be a possibly smart move.

Hopefully WDW can incorporate all this information and safely entertain each of us that want to visit.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Here‘s the thing, a leader needs to set an example. We need people to continue to wear masks and distance. Only 12% of Americans are fully vaccinated. I’ve been the biggest advocate here for relaxing Covid safety protocols once the vast majority of people are vaccinated but we aren’t there yet. We cannot change the rules today to say people who are vaccinated don’t need to wear a mask in public because there’s no good way to know who has been vaccinated and many people are not even eligible yet which would create resentment and even more potential line jumping. People now need to still wear a mask, even if they have been vaccinated. Grand standing in front of the cameras to show how proud you are to not wear that mask is just foolish. We are almost out of this pandemic, but we need to get over the finish line. Biden is vaccinated yet when he walks down a hallway to a podium to give a speech he does it with a mask on. That’s not because he could infect someone near him (very unlikely) but as a way to set an example that he’s still wearing a mask even though he’s vaccinated. People lost their minds when the CA Governor banned indoor dining with a group and then got caught having a dinner party. Leaders need to set an example if we want the masses to follow good safety measures.
There's a flip side to this, though. In the first article I read about the Rand-Fauci clash, it was reported that one of the senators said they wore a mask to "give comfort to others." I believe Rand made reference to that comment. That kind of statement has to stop because all it does is trigger people. Masks should be used for one purpose only - to stop the spread of the virus - and their use should be based on science. Everything Fauci said made sense to me; the comment about giving comfort to others did not.

A leader giving an indoor dinner party after telling others not to do so is hypocritical and should cause people to get upset. And I believe people would get on board with a statement that, until most people are vaccinated, everyone must social distance and wear masks because enforcement would otherwise not be possible. Enforcement is a valid reason. But grandstanding is useless, and it goes both ways. Officials wearing masks when they are nowhere near another person is silly; I would rather have them make a brief statement as to why the circumstances do not require it.
 

havoc315

Well-Known Member
I never understood the concern about fingerprint scanners. You are touching so many other surfaces in the park, one finger on a scanner is hardly going to make a difference.

Big difference as:
1 -- It's a mandatory touch point. A conscientious guest could largely avoid most bare handed touches. It's not that hard to get through a day at WDW without many touches.
2 -- It's thousands of people per day touching the exact same tiny spot.
 

mmascari

Well-Known Member
"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday revised its guidance on social distancing in schools, saying most students can now sit three feet apart instead of six feet so long as they are wearing masks.

The recommendation is for all K-12 students, regardless of whether community transmission is low, moderate or substantial, the CDC said.

In communities where transmission is high, the CDC recommends that middle school and high school students remain at least six feet apart if schools aren’t able to keep students and teachers in assigned groups, the agency said. In elementary schools, where younger children have been shown to be at less risk of transmitting the virus than teens, kids can stay safe at three feet apart with masks, the CDC said.

The CDC said it continues to recommend at least six feet distance between adults in schools and between adults and students. It also still recommends six feet social distancing in common areas, when eating, during in-door activities, such as band practice and sports, and in settings outside of the classroom.

“CDC is committed to leading with science and updating our guidance as new evidence emerges,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in a statement. “Safe in-person instruction gives our kids access to critical social and mental health services that prepare them for the future, in addition to the education they need to succeed.”

The updated guidance from federal health officials comes after a study published last week in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases suggested public schools could safely reopen as long as kids were three feet apart and other mitigation measures, such as wearing masks, were enforced.

Some schools had complained that maintaining a six feet rule was not feasible. The World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics have both OK’d three feet social distancing. White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said Thursday that shortened social guidelines would “likely” happen."


It's been 36 minutes since I got the Washington Post alert and 34 minutes since this post.

Where's the link to the actual CDC release of the guideline with all the nuance details left out of the story headlines?

That's the breaking news topic I come to this discussion for. Who's slacking? ;) :cool:
 

havoc315

Well-Known Member
I tried to watch that entire exchange objectively and I'm not sure I see where Paul was against science. In fact, I saw him repeatedly ask Fauci to explain what science or study has shown that someone who has recovered from Covid or has been fully vaccinated against Covid has become re-infected with the virus and why that person should be required to wear a mask? Fauci hypothesized that some new variant may still infect that person. True as that may be, one of thousand things could infect someone, but conjecture is not science.

Re-infection by new variants isn't conjecture. More and more evidence is emerging that naturally acquired immunity is not very protective for a very long period of time against some of the newer variants.
Brazil is becoming the case study in this, where their entire hospital system is again being overwhelmed -- largely by re-infection.


While it's still being studied, it is far from being just "conjecture."
 

DisneyCane

Well-Known Member
What if the vaccinated person or previously symptomatic person was still shedding virus particles and could infect others nearby?
All indications are that a vaccinated person is around 90% (at least with Pfizer and Moderna) protected against becoming infected at all. The CDC has previously said that somebody who is infected is likely only contagious for around five days. That's where they came up with lowering the isolation time for somebody who tests positive to ten days.

Other science has determined that people who remain completely asymptomatic are not likely to transmit the virus at all. When applied to vaccinated people, this brings the percentage who won't be spreaders to around 95% (again with Pfizer and Moderna for sure).

In best case laboratory tests, cloth face coverings were found to block 70% of SARS-Cov-2 sized particles. This is not the same as being 70% effective in preventing transmission but even if it was, it is far lower than the prevention of transmission provided by vaccination.

Assuming masks are effective (not looking to debate that and derail the thread), other than the logistics of having to figure out who is vaccinated, there is absolutely no justification for a person who has been fully vaccinated to continue to be required to wear a face covering.
 

DisneyFan32

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
Re-infection by new variants isn't conjecture. More and more evidence is emerging that naturally acquired immunity is not very protective for a very long period of time against some of the newer variants.
Brazil is becoming the case study in this, where their entire hospital system is again being overwhelmed -- largely by re-infection.


While it's still being studied, it is far from being just "conjecture."
is Brazil is still working on a vaccine to stop variants?
 

HarperRose

Well-Known Member
With the concerns about facial recognition, magic bans being old technology and anything that requires touching surfaces (i.e. fingerprint scans) because of COVID19 I am surprised the imagineers have not turned to retina scanning. One retina scan at registration time (simply stare into a scanning device) w no physical contact w anything. Voila! To get into your room simply take your glasses off and look at the scanner, to enter a park just look at the scanner, oh yea, link a credit card to your retina scan and when paying for something simply look at the scanner. No touching, secure and specific to each individual. Just a thought.
It's a good thought, but when you scale it up for the size of WDW, all the tens of thousands of resort rooms they have, I'd think the cost would become prohibitive.

(I honestly have no idea how much the technology costs to implement, it may not be as expensive as I think.)
 

MaryJaneP

Well-Known Member
Other science has determined that people who remain completely asymptomatic are not likely to transmit the virus at all.
Doesn't this directly contradict much of the prior science that asymptomatic transmission was the primary cause of the pandemic? Not even sure the mask argument is even about incoming infections alone. Both directions seem to be in play here.
 

Heppenheimer

Well-Known Member
All indications are that a vaccinated person is around 90% (at least with Pfizer and Moderna) protected against becoming infected at all. The CDC has previously said that somebody who is infected is likely only contagious for around five days. That's where they came up with lowering the isolation time for somebody who tests positive to ten days.

Other science has determined that people who remain completely asymptomatic are not likely to transmit the virus at all. When applied to vaccinated people, this brings the percentage who won't be spreaders to around 95% (again with Pfizer and Moderna for sure).

In best case laboratory tests, cloth face coverings were found to block 70% of SARS-Cov-2 sized particles. This is not the same as being 70% effective in preventing transmission but even if it was, it is far lower than the prevention of transmission provided by vaccination.

Assuming masks are effective (not looking to debate that and derail the thread), other than the logistics of having to figure out who is vaccinated, there is absolutely no justification for a person who has been fully vaccinated to continue to be required to wear a face covering.
But as noted... all the data we have of the efficacy of the vaccines was performed on the original strain of the virus. We now have at least three different, far more contagious variants circulating in the country, and at least one will likely be the dominant variant by the end of April. We don't have in vivo data on how well the current vaccines stack up against these variants in terms of reduction in symptomatic cases, hospitalizations, deaths or virulence, but we have at least some in vitro data to suggest that they may not be as effective.

So, unless we really want to risk going right back to square one YET AGAIN, perhaps continuing to observe precautions for now might be more than warranted.
 

hopemax

Well-Known Member

I haven’t read much about kids and COVID but this is the third article in as many days that I’ve seen about lower risks and children, maybe because thoughts are turning to the next school year. Could this be why they’re treating schools differently?
The person who wrote this article is the same person who published the MA school study. Don’t think this article equates to “more information that children are safe.” Unless you think us posting the same thing 10 times is more proof than posting an idea once.

Virologists on my EpiTwitter are banging their heads about how wrong and not based in science her statements are in terms of vectors, transmission control and herd immunity. We will all pay for the idea that parents will think they can take their kid wherever without consequences. It’s one thing to say kids can safely visit in a small family group or have a local play date and then extrapolate to this. But again, she’s saying something people want to hear, so she will be deemed truthful and credible and not someone who is talking outside of her area of expertise about something that is a serious part of really making sure the pandemic has a permanent ending, instead of us chasing our tail.
 

LaughingGravy

Well-Known Member
NJ has stepped up with a lot more opportunities for vaccination. I know someone who had an appt. for June which got moved up to today. We may be able to have a nice summer, but only if everyone cooperates and keeps good habits, distances and also masks unless you are only with people who have also been vaccinated AND have waited two weeks after whatever the last shot was for the full immunization.
Sadly, this past weekend I picked up sandwich at a diner which was fully 75% filled or more with people waiting for tables in very close quarters, only a few masks by some staff members and no distancing to speak of. Same with the little league coaches, kids and parents. Not a mask in sight and no distancing. I thought I was in Texas. Oh, and starting today 3-19-21, the NJ governor opened up restaurant capacity to 50%, with masks and distancing still in place. This is not going to end well anytime soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom