DisneyCane
Well-Known Member
Nobody doesn't include the argument being made by the poster I replied to.Nobody saying mitigation efforts will continue longer is making this argument.
Every post about continued mitigation is specifically about this point.
There is no direct relationship between the vaccine on stopping mitigations. Either when enough is available or when an individual gets vaccinated.
The relationship is when community spread is reduced enough, then mitigation efforts can be reduced and stopped.
Enough vaccine distribution should cause community spread to drop, which will then allow mitigation to stop.
If the vaccine is available to anybody who wants it and proves out to be as effective (especially in preventing serious illness or death) as it looks and 30% of people choose not to be vaccinated, I don't really care how much community spread there is. I'm not going to do anything to try and protect people who choose not to be vaccinated. We don't "mitigate" against the flu and there is rampant community spread of it every year. It just causes a lower percentage of the infected to require hospitalization or die than COVID-19. If the vaccine makes the vaccinated get similar levels of illness from COVID-19 as they would from the flu why would "mitigation" be required?