Virtual Toad
Well-Known Member
If he had stayed out of it personally and not initiated the process by personally calling a rich developer, instead keeping politics out of it by letting state and local health officials decide, I would agree with you. There's no doubt there are a lot of seniors in the area, but let's face it, there are a lot of seniors all over the state. As one of the articles noted, the number of reported COVID cases in the two zip codes chosen are much lower than in neighboring, less affluent zip codes. So the governor's actions, even if the intentions were good, point to at best a lack of reasoned judgement, and at worst, blatant favoritism. As an elected official, why even open yourself up to that sort of criticism and scrutiny?It opens the door for critics because everything is looked at through a political lens. Nobody gives the benefit of the doubt ever. I'm not just talking about criticism of Desantis in this instance. I will guarantee you that if/when Biden targets minority communities there will be people who criticize that as pandering to his base when it makes sense from a statistical standpoint.
In this case, Desantis (correctly, in my opinion) has made vaccinations of people 65 and over the priority. He was given data about two zip codes with a high percentage of people in that age group and the same zip codes have the age group vaccinated at about half the rate of the overall Florida 65+ population. If you (not "you" specifically) didn't know who gave him the information and didn't know the racial makeup and median income of the zip codes, you wouldn't see an issue.
If there are zip codes with similar 65+ population ratios and vaccination rates that also have a significantly higher share of minorities and low income people and those zip codes ask for similar accommodations and are denied, then criticism can be warranted. Purely based on targeting these two zip codes, I think should be given the benefit of the doubt.