I agree. The doctors will only be criticized for underselling the severity of the situation. And with the dearth of information (we have some data but little information), nobody is willing to give a well reasoned forecast. That's why you see these models with 100% infection rates - which feeds the hysteria.
I haven't seen any rational information that fully supports the draconian decisions that are being forced on everyone. This has moved to an emotional response and the public shaming of anyone who doesn't fall in line is fully in force.
I still go back to ground zero - Wuhan. The coronavirus was uncontained for more than a month in Wuhan. Yes there were curfews and armed guards that would not let anyone leave the city but that wasn't until after the death rate became high. Since everyone is quoting an exponential infection rate, Wuhan should be a wasteland. Wuhan has a population of 11 million yet all of China only has ~80,000 reported cases. If all of the cases were in Wuhan that translates into 0.7% infection rate. That means to me that either the infection rate is much lower than what is being discussed OR (quite possibly AND) the severity % is much lower. Implicitly people are thinking that there is both a high infection rate and high severity rate. Of course I'm making a lot of assumptions but, IMO, the numbers in Wuhan just don't match the doomsday scenarios being discussed.