Chi84
Premium Member
The COVID deniers left the building a long time ago, so now the only ones left to shame or bully are the people who post anything less than 100% negative.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion
- Thread starter Parker in NYC
- Start date
-
- Tags
- coronavirus covid covid-19
- Status
1 in one thousand Americans have died from Covid.
Who wants to have fun with numbers? Haunted Mansions hourly capacity (without restrictions) according to google is 2400 people per hour. That means, at the rate we are going to have a guest get the chance to be the 1000th Happy Haunt approximately every 30 min. Totally insignificant numbers I tell you, nothing to worry about...
Who wants to have fun with numbers? Haunted Mansions hourly capacity (without restrictions) according to google is 2400 people per hour. That means, at the rate we are going to have a guest get the chance to be the 1000th Happy Haunt approximately every 30 min. Totally insignificant numbers I tell you, nothing to worry about...
Last edited:
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
They went slightly underground or to a rally...they’re around.
One of the things that elevates man above beast is admitting when you are wrong. It’s a key instinct that is being repressed on purpose. Mistakes without recognition leads to bigger mistakes.
(How’s that for clarity?
)
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
More than 800,000 people in the United States die from cardiovascular disease each year—that’s 1 in every 3 deaths, and about 160,000 of them occur in people under age 65. Heart disease kills roughly the same number of people in the United States each year as cancer, lower respiratory diseases (including pneumonia), and accidents combined.
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
FastStats
FastStats is an official application from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) and puts access to topic-specific statistics at your fingertips.
www.cdc.gov
Chi84
Premium Member
One of the other things that elevates man above beast is the ability to communicate with and tolerate those whose opinions don’t coincide with yours. The inability or unwillingness to do so leads to enormous mistakes - witness certain presidential elections.They went slightly underground or to a rally...they’re around.
One of the things that elevates man above beast is admitting when you are wrong. It’s a key instinct that is being repressed on purpose. Mistakes without recognition leads to bigger mistakes.
(How’s that for clarity?
Jrb1979
Well-Known Member
My stance since the beginning has never changed. WDW and amusement parks shouldn't be open. People shouldn't be traveling for non essential reasons or having gatherings. I will call them out on it. Sorry but it's why we are in the position we are in.
People seem to forget for Covid to spread it needs people. The more people interact with others the more it spreads.
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
But see that’s the problem...
The “opinions” on covid have not mattered since day 1...the qualified people figured it out, said what to do, and people have claimed their OPINIONS more meritorious.
You can lecture me on my opinions of parks, parades, pretty much anything. But for 10 months nobody’s opinion (without a medical degree or large experience in public policy/logistics) frankly matters at all. If we collectively fail this...what good is Anything?
Last edited:
Chi84
Premium Member
I don’t think anyone is forgetting that, but people will disagree on what can reasonably be expected. There are a lot of people (including WDW and all it’s hundreds of thousands of guests) who don’t agree with you on whether amusement parks should be open. There are a lot of people who believe that traveling or gathering - while complying with all restrictions - should be allowed. People will disagree, which is why we have government entities making the rules.
I can understand that people feel strongly about their respective positions, but the lack of tolerance for the opinions of others is dismaying. Clearly, if people didn’t interact at all there would be no COVID. But that’s not possible, and there are legitimate questions about how little interaction is possible or even good.
correcaminos
Well-Known Member
I do think the issue is that some of the stuff you posted is in line with deniers. Not saying you are, but it's the same stuff many do say. If you do not use information carefully it can be used as an excuse not to wear masks, not to distance not to behave etc. Even if you do support mask wearing it kinda came across as contrary. Like arguing just to argue. Much like, to be honest, your quip to me honing in on how a specific word was used. A different angle and method of delivery might make people not want to argue back. Just an outside view.
I was not at my aunt's burial today because of the pure number of people in the area she was born that do not use masks. We had only one person there since their lack of mask use is appalling. While my risk is low as it is and possibly better than some if I did get the vaccine, I still opted to stay home as to not risk spread. My risk is low, but possible spread is real. The person who went can quaratine as they are widowed and live alone. Since my aunt never married nor had children we are all she had. Giving facts on how good my chances are don't matter, knowing so many were maskless is what I will focus on, not a specific type of math.
Just a point of view again.
easyrowrdw
Well-Known Member
It's not denying the severity to note the likelihood of certain outcomes. Taking that information and saying, "therefore everyone just do what they want" might fit your definition, but that's not what the poster was doing.
easyrowrdw
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry to hear about your aunt, helenabear. Is this the aunt who'd travel with y'all to the parks?
Jrb1979
Well-Known Member
Its not possible to not interact with others but you can severely limit it. If people followed what the CDC says things would be much better
correcaminos
Well-Known Member
Yes it is. We were so lucky to get as many trips with her as we did. She had been in a LTC facility for almost 4 years and even survived a covid outbreak in the spring. We last took her 5 years ago and gave her a trip of a lifetime (spoiled her with a few days in a bungalow). But her cerebral palsy combined with ALS was too much. Sadly due to us having colds in the late winter, I hadn't seen her in person for about a year... kind of why I considered unblinding myself so she could have another come in to care for her.
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
I honestly never understood anyone defending optional travel...but I understand the impulse.
But now...with a vaccine that appears to be effective?
Why? In the name of sweet baby jesus, what possible leisure justification is there now?
“You’re booked”?
Cancel..:everyone is giving you your investment back (with one notable exception...but I won’t go there)
“You’re careful”?
So what?...not everyone you’ll pass will be...and you don’t need to go there
“But you’re only ____ once”?
So?...we live too long anyway (if we’re not stupid and/or unlucky)...17,18....49,50...74,75...what’s the frikkin difference if you look at it with big boy/girl pants on?
Remember the bad 2001 sequel? “2010: the year we made Contact”?
“2020: the year our selfishness overpowered our brains and made us stupid”
DisneyCane
Well-Known Member
My friend's healthy daughter in her early 30s died from the flu in March 2019 (before COVID). Rare and tragic outcomes are not exclusive to COVID.
- Status