BrianLo
Well-Known Member
There was a long period where PA had much more severe restrictions in place than FL, especially during the summer spike in FL. Those numbers, combined with the current situation add credence to my opinion that severe restrictions serve to delay spread, not prevent spread. Once the restrictions are relaxed, the virus returns to natural behavior.
I think your overall point here is largely correct. It’s the implication of it that has changed. There was a real ‘why delay the inevitable’ discussion that had some validity once upon a time. Other than to not overwhelm health care there was little actually being achieved since most countries gave up on true localized eradication via restrictions alone.
Now that there are several vaccine candidates that discussion is less valid. We’re now delaying illness to vaccinate the population. Letting it ravage prematurely damages the economy and public health and gives up on the endpoint tools that are actually coming soon.