Chi84
Premium Member
Many interesting points in that article. As the virus becomes more widespread, it's more difficult to pinpoint where someone was infected.I read this the other day and thought it was interesting.
Small Gatherings Spread the Virus, but Are They Causing the Surge? (Published 2020)
Yes, the coronavirus can be transmitted over cocktails and dinners. But these get-togethers may not account for the huge rise in cases.www.nytimes.com
As stated in the article, some restrictions make no sense apart from the need for uniform enforceability. Our local arboretum requires people to wear masks as they pass each other on the trails even though there is no evidence the virus can be transmitted in that brief a time, outdoors, from several feet away.
People seem to have lost perspective. In reaction to the information about asymptomatic spread, they went from behaving as though anyone could have the virus (sensible) to believing everyone did have the virus (unreasonable). The last I heard, a little under 4% of the population has tested positive and the CDC has estimated twice as many may be infected. (If I'm wrong about that, sorry, but I'm sure someone will come along and correct it.) That leaves over 92% of the US population not infected. That's probably the reason for the article's finding that small gatherings may not be driving the spread - the chances of anyone being infected at such a gathering are quite low.
The original message about this virus still holds true. It is imperative to take all available measures to stop the spread because the size of the US population and limited hospital beds and healthcare resources will quickly be overwhelmed even by a small percentage of the population needing treatment. But the risk of the average person becoming infected is still quite low. I do everything I'm supposed to in terms of staying home as much as possible, wearing a mask when I'm out of the house, being careful about what I touch and washing hands, using sanitizer, etc. I'm careful, but not worried.