Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Like I said, I think we agree that it’s not wise for Disney to expand capacity.
But I’m done with “it’s up to individuals and States.“ That approach and mentality is putting us all at risk. And I’m not willing to let Disney off the hook simply because they put stickers on the ground and plastic dividers on rides. By opening, they are enabling the sort of “individual choice” that is killing people. They’re showing that they will gladly take irresponsible guests’ money even if it puts at-risk people (CMs and even people who don’t go to the parks) at even greater risk.
Indoor dining might be the highest-risk activity at Disney parks, but we don’t know what the risks are of all the activities in the parks. The recommendations for measures to keep us safe as we do essential things (like grocery shopping or essential work) were not designed for leisure activities like riding rides and eating at restaurants and watching cavalcades.
This times 10. It’s embarrassing that it has to be said at this point.
I think is up to Disney to stay open or close, not the state.
You have “experts” that advise the state and you have other “experts” that advise Disney, so it’s expert VS. expert, and while I can’t speak for motivation of the state’s experts, I think we can assume Disney is making the best decision for its most important entity, the shareholder.
We can’t assume Disney would say “stay open at all costs”, because after consulting their experts, it may be in the best interest of the shareholder to close.
Honestly...none of this makes any sense. This is still a public health issue and that means Disney has no basis to override any public health directives. The problem is their are parks in at least one badly run state (the other is debatable...but I can see it)
So when it becomes to covid...the cries for “corporate freedom!” Now devolve towards some light form or “lawlessness”?
That’s clueless.
Last edited: