Kevin_W
Well-Known Member
I’m sorry if I bored you. Just tried to present the facts behind the story
Not at all - I'm sorry that tone isn't easy to convey in text on the internet. I genuinely appreciated your post.
I’m sorry if I bored you. Just tried to present the facts behind the story
Fair and valid point, but is social justice the only thing worth it enough to "take risks"?ie - some things (like social justice) may be important enough to take risks.
Haven’t seen one article, one post or one comment saying the riots were ok or excusable.Source?Fair and valid point, but is social justice the only thing worth it enough to "take risks"?
Small business owners have been arrested for taking a risk to save their way of life i.e putting food on the table, paying their bills, keeping their home, etc. and were harshly criticized by many of the same people excusing the riots and protests (which have destroyed many small businesses) as "worth it".
Up until the protests began, it was taboo to suggest that there just might be things important enough to take the risk of COVID-19 transmission over. You were pretty much shouted down as not caring about people's lives if you said so. From people attending church services that are deeply important to them to small businesses that provide family livelihoods even being allowed to be open, we've been told that we just couldn't take the risk. And if you look at my posting history, I think you'll see that I was one supporting those efforts to restrict activities to slow the spread.I don't claim to be a science guy, but I'll take a stab at it anyway.
I don't read this statement as saying protests are not a potential spreading event, I simply read it at face value: we don't condemn these protests... but that doesn't mean all gatherings are ok.
ie - some things (like social justice) may be important enough to take risks.
This is because science often get corrupted by politics.This makes absolutely no sense to me ? Can someone of you science guys/gals please help to explain to me how one is ok but not the other in terms of science and spread?
Disagree. I could easily make an entire vacation at Walt Disney World without ever setting foot in one of the theme parks. There is so much there beyond just the parks.So the hotels are opening. It's one thing they forgot to get rid of, parking fees. There is absolutely no purpose in staying at Disney with no parks.
Disagree. I could easily make an entire vacation at Walt Disney World without ever setting foot in one of the theme parks. There is so much there beyond just the parks.
Before somebody brings up the "spike" in Florida's cases yesterday (and Friday), look at the number of tests. Yesterday there were over 57,000 test results (Friday was over 41,000), which is the highest I've ever seen in a day by a lot. I think the highest I've ever seen before was under 42,000. The new case positive rate was 2.6%.
These "spikes" in cases are probably a good thing because it seems that more mild and, especially asymptomatic cases are being discovered. This means that more people who are infected will know they are infected and quarantine. Also, contact tracing allows people in contact with them to get tested.
I don't claim to be a science guy, but I'll take a stab at it anyway.
I don't read this statement as saying protests are not a potential spreading event, I simply read it at face value: we don't condemn these protests... but that doesn't mean all gatherings are ok.
ie - some things (like social justice) may be important enough to take risks.
There was a big increase in tests in mid to late May and the percent positive went down. And when testing went down, the rate positive started to climb. So, therefore, there is an inverse relationship between the two...
Except... before that big spike in tests in mid May, there was no clear correlation between tests and rate positive. And for the past few days, testing went back up and rate positive didn't go down, but continued to climb.
And... correlation isn't causation.
I've posted before that rate positive is unreliable unless there is systematic randomized testing, so, I'm not going to die on the hill that rate positive is increasing.
But, when you take into account the increasing number of absolute positives and the failure of the death rate to go down significantly... I don't think any case can be made that things are getting better in Florida.
View attachment 475023
View attachment 475024
Any thoughts on the choice of Topolino's as the only place to have character dining?
What site was this from?
"Character Waving".I wouldn't call it character dining just yet. There's a weasel word in there that may mean they just wave at a distance, and I wouldn't call that character dining.
Agreed.I think the problem with that whole statement boils down to just a few works "we do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission" which is the one being echoed a lot on social media. It makes is sound like they are saying these gatherings are not risky for the transmission of COVID-19. They should have simply said, "we do not condemn these gatherings, but emphasize that they are risky for COVID-19 transmission"
I wouldn't call it character dining just yet. There's a weasel word in there that may mean they just wave at a distance, and I wouldn't call that character dining.
Haven’t seen one article, one post or one comment saying the riots were ok or excusable.Source?
Agreed.
Not sure if anyone already posted it, but here's the full letter. The context helps to understand what they were trying to say.
Over 1,000 health professionals sign a letter saying, Don’t shut down protests using coronavirus concerns as an excuse - Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News
(CNN) — A group of health and medical colleagues has penned an open letter to express their concern that protests around the United States could<a class="excerpt-read-more"...www.google.com
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.