BrerFrog
Active Member
Why is it that Disney doesnt want anyone who puts in heart and soul and has a knowledge and history of the parks? I dont get that. Or was he getting ready to retire anyhow?
My bet would be on his fat salary.
Why is it that Disney doesnt want anyone who puts in heart and soul and has a knowledge and history of the parks? I dont get that. Or was he getting ready to retire anyhow?
My bet would be on his fat salary.
Salary, age, the fact he and his boss Tom F. don't get along too well, etc.
Lots of factors leading to Tony leaving in the short term.
Salary, age, the fact he and his boss Tom F. don't get along too well, etc.
Lots of factors leading to Tony leaving in the short term.
Yeah, I was reading through a long discussion on that the other day.
I think Baxter having his hands on the current Imagination pavillion for a complete overhaul wouldn't do that relationship a lot of good.
How did the same guy who made Horizons come up with that Imagination redo?
I mean, come on, he has to know people hate his redesigned Imagination... Both versions. Why can't someone tell Tom to step back and let others take over. I mean, people above him must know how much people hate this ride, right? Why can't they put Baxter in charge of it?Arrrggghhh.
:fork:
If you're implying that Tom F. made Horizons, he didn't. His likeness was in the attraction as we know, but he wasn't the main Imagineer behind it, I think it was Bob Gurr
Gurr and George Mcginnis were the steering forces of Horizons. Fitzgerald was just a lowly show writer.If you're implying that Tom F. made Horizons, he didn't. His likeness was in the attraction as we know, but he wasn't the main Imagineer behind it, I think it was Bob Gurr
Something he was actually good at.Fitzgerald was just a lowly show writer.
Something he was actually good at.
If you're implying that Tom F. made Horizons, he didn't. His likeness was in the attraction as we know, but he wasn't the main Imagineer behind it, I think it was Bob Gurr
Because Fitzgerald and his screen fetish are cheaper than AA's.Then how in the world did Fitzgerald get such a position of authority over Tony Baxter?? This makes no sense.
All his time I thought he was a huge part of the most immersive attraction in Disney history. And now I find out he was just there for the Imax screens. I feel used.
couldn't have said it better myselfBecause Fitzgerald and his screen fetish are cheaper than AA's.
Tony Baxter is a traditionalist rebel. Fitzgerald is a "yes" man.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.