That's true, and soon to be in the BBB ( Billionaire Boys Club ).When Iger became CEO the stock price was $23, today it’s $145… he made himself a ton of money, primarily through the long term growth of the company based on his leadership.
That's true, and soon to be in the BBB ( Billionaire Boys Club ).When Iger became CEO the stock price was $23, today it’s $145… he made himself a ton of money, primarily through the long term growth of the company based on his leadership.
FTFY.When Iger became CEO the stock price was $23, today it’s $145… he made himself a ton of money, primarily through the long term growth of the company based on hisleadershipacquisitions.
Who lead during those acquisitions?FTFY.
Buying up other companies <> leadership. IMHO. He was smart enough to let Feige run the MCU. The rest… Not nearly as successful so far.Who lead during those acquisitions?
The stock price is based on Wall Street confidence...nothing more.When Iger became CEO the stock price was $23, today it’s $145… he made himself a ton of money, primarily through the long term growth of the company based on his leadership.
And the fixation in doing stock buybacks to inflate stock prices.When Iger became CEO the stock price was $23, today it’s $145… he made himself a ton of money, primarily through the long term growth of the company based on his leadership.
I was moreso referring to park spending than studio acquisitions. It's much harder to measure how much money and even attendence they get off of additions to the park. However, you can look at things like capacity. Is the ride an addition to the park (adding capacity) and does it move more or less people through the lines in an hour than other popular rides. Stuff like Pixar Pier, Toy Story Land, and even Rise of the Resistance fail in this category. Even stuff like Mickey, which has a notably high capacity for a new attraction, still kinda flops because it replaced an already popular high capacity attraction.Technically, almost every purchase of Iger has given Disney a ton of money. Marvel for example.
That they destroyed afterwards its another thing..
Where do I find that in high res?Disney is/was well diversified long before hopping on the bandwagon and launching their own streaming service.
View attachment 604720
Where do I find that in high res?
Schmozzing the right people makes them feel good . It works with some bosses I knew.The stock price is based on Wall Street confidence...nothing more.
How does Disney’s performance compare to their competitors in the entertainment industry? Comcast, Discovery, ViacomCBS, Netflix, etc.I pointed this out in another thread but Chapek is not doing a good job from a stock standpoint either here is Disney stock vs S&P 500 YTD:
View attachment 604871View attachment 604872
This is what’s going to make his seat hot, he is going to need to turn things around soon. The parks are getting squeezed to make up for other failing divisions. A company cannot continue to lose stock owners money for long.
If you took parks out of the Disney portfolio I bet it would be similar or worse.I would much rather be in Chapek’s shoes than whoever is running Discovery. That looks horrid.
I'm no economist by any means but it seems to me at on time companies had pensions and many people didn't get involved with the stock market. With the demise of pensions people are now forced to invest in the stock market for their retirement driving up the prices of stocks. Are these companies really worth their high prices or have they been artificially driven up because people have no other place to invest--banks surely are not paying any interest these days
Companies needed to reduce costs and transfer risk to staff instead of risking company money.Pensions tend to be invested in the stock market anyway because it historically offers the best bang for your buck - it's just a matter of who is putting the money in and how much they're willing to invest.
They’re about to take over Warner Bros.I would much rather be in Chapek’s shoes than whoever is running Discovery. That looks horrid.
Compare it to FUN and it doesn't look good.I pointed this out in another thread but Chapek is not doing a good job from a stock standpoint either here is Disney stock vs S&P 500 YTD:
View attachment 604871View attachment 604872
This is what’s going to make his seat hot, he is going to need to turn things around soon. The parks are getting squeezed to make up for other failing divisions. A company cannot continue to lose stock owners money for long.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.