JWG
Well-Known Member
My guess is that when it was first introduced, it was positioned as a money-saving move for the consumer, and Disney's benefit was that the guest didn't leave property (more in-park time means more $$).
I would bet that now they're going to position it more from a "you don't have to worry about carrying money!!" standpoint than a savings standpoint.
I could see Disney almost considering that it's fair to charge a PREMIUM for the dining plan (meaning more than you'd normally spend at a dinner), because of its "ease of use".
I can agree with this other than I do have to carry cash. I have to pay my tip. So, I either need cash, credit or charge to room. So, I'm charged a premium to carry "less" cash.
We didn't do DDP on our last trip and we tracked cost. DDP would have saved us HUGE on our 3-9 year old who pays the kids price because that DDP cost is so low per day. My parents spent about 65-70% what they would have on DDP by splitting lunches at QSR locations. Which considering the size of the chicken fingers, is reasonable to do. My wife and I probably only saved 5-10% on the DDP plan because we don't eat the same things.
Ultimately, removing the dessert doesn't bother me as we didn't need them and ate them out of necessity. We also always end up with too many leftover snacks.
I wish they'd have a lower price point version of the plan with these options that would allow you to add on if you so chose. Something between DDP and DDP Deluxe.
Anyway, we won't likely do it again as we typically have a car and eat off property at times as well.