If something opens five to six years after Potter, can we really fairly use the term Potter Swatter at all? It is just kind of sad.
For the people bragging about how Avatar is going to be on par or blow Potter out of the water...shouldn't it? It is coming from a company that is able to throw millions of more of investment into their theme parks(yet rarely do as a ratio of earning to spending) and it is coming a half a decade later. To have to even question it is pretty pathetic and sad when we consider that.
For the people bragging about how Avatar is going to be on par or blow Potter out of the water...shouldn't it? It is coming from a company that is able to throw millions of more of investment into their theme parks(yet rarely do as a ratio of earning to spending) and it is coming a half a decade later. To have to even question it is pretty pathetic and sad when we consider that.