Horizons '83
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
Question, for Citrico's, the day we can book is July 1st, do we know if they open it up at 6AM like the typical 60 day window?
That’s fair… it’s as if Michael Eisner literally told WDI in 1985, “Let’s build a flagship hotel for WDW that uses the same decorators and architects of the best new hotels of Beverly Hills and base the exterior on that hotel in San Diego.”Yep, I've seen the Del and know what it looks like. I actually think its exterior is kind of ugly and that the GF improves on it (setting aside the Villa building, which is hideous).
That said, the Del was built in 1888 and is still considered to be a "wooden Victorian beach resort." That's absolutely what the GF is meant to evoke. Is it the quintessential example of Victorian architecture? No, but very few elements of WDW represent the quintessential version of their inspiration. There are a few exceptions in there, like Morocco in Epcot being impressively ornate, but that knock isn't unique to GF. I just think it's an easier target because the theme is more played out, boring, and typical.
Still, it's what we ended up with, and I don't think the addition of Mary Poppins or Alice hurt it. Even think they'd be a net positive addition to the rooms.
In my experience that has been the case.Question, for Citrico's, the day we can book is July 1st, do we know if they open it up at 6AM like the typical 60 day window?
Yep, not saying it was perfectly conceived (I think framing it as an Old Florida beach resort was a misstep - just call it a modern/contemporary take on Victorian), and I respect the criticism that it doesn't fulfill its theme perfectly, I just think there are very few WDW resorts that actually do.That’s fair… it’s as if Michael Eisner literally told WDI in 1985, “Let’s build a flagship hotel for WDW that uses the same decorators and architects of the best new hotels of Beverly Hills and base the exterior on that hotel in San Diego.”
Poppins. Never, ever just Mary.are Mary herself, practically perfect in every way.
Thanks for sharing. Looks like a solid menu to me - I like the sound of the salads, citrus-cured hamachi, and smoked cauliflower.Here is the new menu -
I approve, do something similar to the cafe now and the rest of the resort. I think “inspired by” is different than “themed to”. You’re not going to see “Mary’s soup of the day” on the menu, it’s still citricos, it’s just the colors textures etc were inspired by that in the movie. If you didn’t read this press release you’d probably never know. Enchanted Rose went one step too far with incorporating some props from the movie. Take down the painting of the castle and the mrs Potts display and just have it as an elegant space and it would have been fine.
If you’re seeking legitimate thematic cohesion at WDW going forward, my condolences.
If there’s any architectural style that is pleasant and fits a Californian wooded area, it’s California Craftsman / Mission Style. I think The Grand Californian is by far the best Disney hotel in the Continental United States. It makes more sense if you study the detail work and the design intent of the architect. Take a look at some of the Greene and Greene homes as well. It does a spectacular job of dressing up the California Bungalow style home and bringing it to the scale required for a National Park Lodge or Theme Park Hotel.Yep, not saying it was perfectly conceived (I think framing it as an Old Florida beach resort was a misstep - just call it a modern/contemporary take on Victorian), and I respect the criticism that it doesn't fulfill its theme perfectly, I just think there are very few WDW resorts that actually do.
AKL and WL are the two that stand out there - even Poly skews more toward the mid-century mainland tiki craze than anything.
One hotel in particular I've never understood is Grand Californian. I love the idea, and of course the location is unbeatable, but I think Wilderness Lodge does the rustic lodge thing better. Yes, there are subtle differences in the theming (GCH going more for Arts and Crafts / Northern California), but location aside, I'd take GF and WL over GCH.
That hotel in San Diego is "The most famous of historic hotels in San Diego is Hotel del Coronado, a National Historic Landmark. It’s located on Coronado Island in San Diego Bay, within sight of downtown San Diego. Opened in February 1888, it’s now over 130 years old." It is class.That’s fair… it’s as if Michael Eisner literally told WDI in 1985, “Let’s build a flagship hotel for WDW that uses the same decorators and architects of the best new hotels of Beverly Hills and base the exterior on that hotel in San Diego.”
If I want woodsy I will stay at the Wilderness Lodge.If there’s any architectural style that is pleasant and fits a Californian wooded area, it’s California Craftsman / Mission Style. I think The Grand Californian is by far the best Disney hotel in the Continental United States. It makes more sense if you study the detail work and the design intent of the architect. Take a look at some of the Greene and Greene homes as well. It does a spectacular job of dressing up the California Bungalow style home and bringing it to the scale required for a National Park Lodge or Theme Park Hotel.
I respect where you're coming from, but we'll have to agree to disagree (which is fine - even among professional architects I'm sure there are varying opinions).If there’s any architectural style that is pleasant and fits a Californian wooded area, it’s California Craftsman / Mission Style. I think The Grand Californian is by far the best Disney hotel in the Continental United States. It makes more sense if you study the detail work and the design intent of the architect. Take a look at some of the Greene and Greene homes as well. It does a spectacular job of dressing up the California Bungalow style home and bringing it to the scale required for a National Park Lodge or Theme Park Hotel.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.