News Bob Iger is back! Chapek is out!!

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
What do you think they should do with D+? Dump it? Change the programming?

(I'm not a subscriber, I dumped it after my free year because none of the programming interested me.)
There is still a lot of Disney things not on D+. I would look into adding a different slightly higher priced tier for new shows (designed for D+ like Mandalorian for example) and the lower tier we have today the pre-existing Disney things (all past movies and shows). Newer movies could be viewed on D+ for an additional price (if in the cheaper tier). Not sure that would work but that’s an idea
 

MagicHappens1971

Well-Known Member
There is still a lot of Disney things not on D+. I would look into adding a different slightly higher priced tier for new shows (designed for D+ like Mandalorian for example) and the lower tier we have today the pre-existing Disney things (all past movies and shows). Newer movies could be viewed on D+ for an additional price (if in the cheaper tier). Not sure that would work but that’s an idea
I think Disney would be one of the first to do this, if they did. I think Peacock may have done this but not on the same level
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
As suspected Perlmutter is a major proponent for Peltz, which makes you wonder if he's out for blood against Feige and Iger for essentially taking Marvel away from him.

Kinda shocked why Perlmutter has never bothered leaving or was fired, especially after getting embarrassed by Black Panther being a huge hit after suppressing it for so long.
 

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
Not trying to argue, but I don’t see how it’s a bad plan? Sure, Disney is in the most vulnerable phase of the plan right now, but it seems to be working.
Disney was playing Robin Hood with their own business. Stealing from the rich (parks) to give to the poor (streaming)

I wouldn’t exactly consider the mess Disney is in at the moment working…sure the lights are on, but I’m not sure anyone is home keeping things clean and taking out the trash
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
unless you like to ignore the general vibe of the guy being a crank and hone in on “wanting to spend more on parks”…

If this crypt keeper gets ahold of significant influence, i can guarantee you that not one red cent of capex will be pursued in the parks.
This guy is dangerous…there is no question to that.

You know who else is? Bob Iger…and his puppet BOD.
No actual Disney fan should give him a mulligan for his cowardice or corporate mismanagement that resulted in Slaphead.

He’s was never good enough for that.

So what should happen? An immediate, legit outside search for a new management team - blended with who’s left that is worth it longterm…and an announcement and a reasonable transition as they fix mistakes.

2 years, Bob…for ONCE do what you damn say you will. People are on to your game. And it’s as stale as Tom Brady was last night.
 
Last edited:

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Working how?

They’re losing huge money on streaming even after far outpacing their projections upfront.

I hope we aren’t gonna say:
1. More people paying alot more.
2. Watching commercials
3. Nobody ever cancels

I’m definitely missing something.

Use small words and explain it to me.



And by the way…they never said that they’d drain parks to pay for stream.

They said they’d lose money first…but that doesn’t matter because nobody would ever reject any product with their brand on it.

I hope you kept your receipts.
Think about how few businesses have the luxury of taking time to build their subscriber base and figure out profitability. Very few. Netflix had that Silicon Valley startup money. Disney had brainwashed audiences and steady demand at the entrance gate.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Not trying to argue, but I don’t see how it’s a bad plan? Sure, Disney is in the most vulnerable phase of the plan right now, but it seems to be working.
Because you can’t suck all the longterm stability out of your most stable/core business segment in order to fuel one that is a flyer…

Gotta pull back and look big picture a little.

Is it too hard to balance? Tough…that’s the job, Bob. If you want to quit…you know how.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Disney was playing Robin Hood with their own business. Stealing from the rich (parks) to give to the poor (streaming)
Disney wasn’t “stealing” from itself.
I wouldn’t exactly consider the mess Disney is in at the moment working…sure the lights are on, but I’m not sure anyone is home keeping things clean and taking out the trash
Not sure what “mess” you keep referring to. How did you expect it would go if one of the largest movie studios in history changed its business from a traditional model to an entirely new one?
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Because you can’t suck all the longterm stability out of your most stable/core business segment in order to fuel one that is a flyer…

Gotta pull back and look big picture a little.

Is it too hard to balance? Tough…that’s the job, Bob. If you want to quit…you know how.
You’re the one looking too short-term. Temporary stress for long-term gain. Futurepoofing so there’s a Disney for the next generation.
 

LSLS

Well-Known Member
Nobody other than Bob Iger and a dozen people on Disney fan sites ever claimed with a straight face that Bob Iger was smart
I'll disagree with you here, I think he is smart. Look at the sites/social media, and the over-the-top love he is getting. Cast members crying in happiness, standing ovations in the parks. The majority of the policies the fans HATE/cringe over were fully under him or the the process started under him, yet he is BELOVED now for taking a couple away. He maximized his money for 15 years, bailed to maximize his money while sticking it to the customers, and then set the next guy up to look worse than him so that people miss him. The chance to come back and eliminate a couple hated things to make him even more loved by the fans was just a lucky break.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I think I missed what we are talking about here. What is working? They have more subscribers, but didn't they have a LARGE miss on their profitability for the year?
I’m no expert…but I believe they weren’t supposed to be profitable…

They just posted a lot bigger hole than the brokers are comfortable with. It calls all the promises about profits into question - it’s a snowball at the top of the mountain
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Disney was playing Robin Hood with their own business. Stealing from the rich (parks) to give to the poor (streaming)

It's called INVESTING -- Established companies do it with their own resources, upstarts need to borrow or find investors to do it. Nothing Robin Hood about it... in other companies they call it 'emerging technologies' or whatever.

Not every market is in the black from the start. Disney communicated this from the start.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I'll disagree with you here, I think he is smart. Look at the sites/social media, and the over-the-top love he is getting. Cast members crying in happiness, standing ovations in the parks. The majority of the policies the fans HATE/cringe over were fully under him or the the process started under him, yet he is BELOVED now for taking a couple away. He maximized his money for 15 years, bailed to maximize his money while sticking it to the customers, and then set the next guy up to look worse than him so that people miss him. The chance to come back and eliminate a couple hated things to make him even more loved by the fans was just a lucky break.
I was exaggerating for comedic effect…try and keep up 🤪

He’s actually done better than i would have imagined all those years ago…

But just like his predecessor…it’s time. It’s past time. Nothing in his lamp to rub anymore.

Do I want them raided and drained? No. But it will be at some point unless Iger and his cronies sacrifice THEMSELVES on the alter of Disney.

Ron Miller did it. Eisner did it (fact). Hell…even Roy E did it.

This isn’t a company like DuPont…so please don’t leave it like Sears, GE or Kodak
 
Last edited:

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It's called INVESTING -- Established companies do it with their own resources, upstarts need to borrow or find investors to do it. Nothing Robin Hood about it... in other companies they call it 'emerging technologies' or whatever.

Not every market is in the black from the start. Disney communicated this from the start.
It’s really not a question of intent or strategy…it’s whether they bet on the wrong horse and will it sink them or make them more susceptible to what’s going on right now.

You were never gonna get people to pay $350 a day to ride the teacups to build something that they’ll pay $50 a month for at home for a minor distraction. The world has too much out there to gobble up time now
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom