this is so transparent i can see into the back panel of my computer screen
First and last bullet point is very, very interesting.this is so transparent i can see into the back panel of my computer screen
Iger, Staggs, Rasulo, Pressler... all of these people oversaw the institutional rot that you ascribe to Chapek alone.But stepping back from just the parks, to me, the work that Chapek was doing, was hollowing out the company and I expect that to stop with Iger back.
The reality is, this is chance for Iger to get a do-over on selecting his replacement.
Like the guy or not but he is laughing all the way to the bank right now. Granted people when they get to this point do not want to be fired the way he does but walking away with 50+mm along with everything he has made im sure he will be fine. Listen he was awful no defending things he did but lets face it we are bringing back the man who literally created this mess. There is literally NO denying that anyone who tries to is just fooling themselves. Now maybe some of Chapeks moves were desperation bc he needed to cut corners to save company money and knew Fla was the place to do it bc people would come who knows either way we are in not much better shape unless Iger does a 180 and learns from past mistakes…People can publicly cheer my firing if I get to ride off with millions of $$
Which is a fair assessment. Things may have gone exactly as they did. I'm just pointing out why I imagine some people are perhaps more optimistic than the average poster here. Also, it's just generally more pleasant working for someone who has a modicum of emotional intelligence.There's only one single thing I feel fairly confident would have been different with Iger at the helm. And that is the baseline intelligence to not publicly admit that you're swindling customers. Or making broad and factually incorrect statements about the age demographics who they're making animated content for. But that's pretty much it. Hell, I don't even believe Iger disagrees with Chapek's aforementioned comments, he just probably has the sense to know not to admit it out loud (or would word it in a less stupid way).
I believe that had Iger remained CEO (which he still effectively was until December 2021), there would have been virtually no difference in the way the parks have been managed, priced etc etc. The price hikes and cuts to the guest experience during Chapek's extremely short reign have been entirely consistent with Iger's business practices. I will be shocked if anything changes in that regard with Iger being put back in control again. If anything, I expect them to get even worse.
He's certainly not gonna be hurting, thats for sure. Who knows what his future plans are, or cares, but where do you go from here if you're him and still want to continue your career? A very public firing, mutiny, from the Walt Disney Co. Dumped on by every financial report. This isn't sorrow for the man, was just thinking about it.Here's a clip of Bob Chapek's reaction to the devastating news of his removal, thepoorman, such unfathomable sadness-
Iger, Staggs, Rasulo, Pressler... all of these people oversaw the institutional rot that you ascribe to Chapek alone...
Here's a clip of Bob Chapek's reaction to the devastating news of his removal, thepoorman, such unfathomable sadness-
He's certainly not gonna be hurting, thats for sure. Who knows what his future plans are, or cares, but where do you go from here if you're him and still want to continue your career? A very public firing, mutiny, from the Walt Disney Co. Dumped on by every financial report. This isn't sorrow for the man, was just thinking about it.
I just want to know as part of his severance does he have to pay for Genie+ or not lolI'd love to retire with tens of millions of dollars at the age of 62.
Bob Chapek may be the biggest winner in all of this.
Some hair plugs, a facelift - insane Disney fans won't even recognize him in the airport and he can do whatever he wants!
Free ILLs for lifeI just want to know as part of his severance does he have to pay for Genie+ or not lol
He's certainly not gonna be hurting, thats for sure. Who knows what his future plans are, or cares, but where do you go from here if you're him and still want to continue your career? A very public firing, mutiny, from the Walt Disney Co. Dumped on by every financial report. This isn't sorrow for the man, was just thinking about it.
Not remotely; I just think it is fair to include Iger when we talk about hollowing out the company; this is a thing he as responsible for as the man that replaced him/he replaced.I think you're inferring a lot from my statement.
I never said every ill to ever befall the company (or the parks) came down to one man, did I?
I've been around long enough to see the damage caused by all of these people (although only one person on you list ever ran the company) and I've said ad nauseam in this very thread, I'm not a fan of Iger, but putting creative people back in control of their own departments - one of the first things Chapek took away and the very first thing Iger started rolling on day-one of his comeback tour - seems like a move in the right direction to me.
Are you saying you disagree?
So he still has to wait on 20 min lines?Free ILLs for life
First off that was a cool story. Secondarily, I believe Paul Reubens has a similar deal. Maybe not with the plaid assistant, but I'm pretty sure he has a lifetime pass.The thing about this example is, in this deal, he was actually doing work FOR Disneyland so it isn't like P&R was giving up something so the studios could benefit from it or anything but someone in some department that was going to have to pay for it, didn't see the benefit to them in saying yes.*
He was simply trying to horse trade with P&R to come to an agreement both could accept and they were like "nope!".
*To be fair though, in such close proximity to Hollywood, they probably get a lot of screwy asks that create logistic nightmares which I imagine inclines them to say no.
In principle, I agree with everything you're saying.
But when divisions, departments and individuals have to constantly justify their budget and existence in any largish company, it creates its own weird internal economy.
There is a story about how Dave Foley was approached to do the voice work for Flik in California Adventure and was offered insultingly low pay for it so he tried to make them a deal that would cost the company very little while being of immense personal value to his kids but would have been considered an expense to P&R and they said no.
It wasn't until Lasiter heard the imitation voice actor in the park, questioned why it obviously wasn't Foley and then insisted they give him what he asked for to fix it.
In telling the story, Foley makes it sound simple and if you had no idea how much Disney normally charges for what he was asking for, it would seem simple but on their books, it clearly wasn't.
EDIT:
Found the two hour interview and the place in it where he tells the story if you're interested. Really, this is just an example to illustrate what it's like in a company of this size. In the conversation, Kevin Pollak seems to have a sense of how the company would view that ask while Dave doesn't:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.