GoofGoof
Premium Member
They are paid for. The options allow him (or anybody that is given them) to purchase shares at a specified price. The idea is that when the option is available for execution, the price will be higher than the "strike price."
Regardless, the company must actually sell those shares to the person executing the options. It has to come from shares the company already holds of itself or shares they will purchase on the market. Even if they purchase the shares at a good price, there is still a cost. I suppose they could do it "for free" by issuing new shares but that would dilute the value of the outstanding shares.
In today's TWDC the stock options are basically the equivalent of a cash bonus from a cash flow standpoint. They are using treasury stock to cover the exercised options and treasury stock is being replenished from stock buybacks every year. So basically the company buys shares back using cash on hand. Those shares end up in treasury stock and some of them are eventually used when options are exercised. They could just pay a cash bonus and buy less shares back and they would end up with the same amount of cash left for other investment. The difference for Iger and the execs is that the options are only worth something if the price goes up. For shareholders it's at least a guarantee that if their investment goes down the execs will end up with less compensation. In that case Iger would need to "get buy" on his millions of base salary aloneI know how stock options work. My point is that it's not a cash outlay and the folks "paying for it" are not the customers but the shareholders.