ImperfectPixie
Well-Known Member
I wasn't talking about the chart in the comment you quoted?The chart states it's for 5th grade, which is when many students start puberty.
I wasn't talking about the chart in the comment you quoted?The chart states it's for 5th grade, which is when many students start puberty.
So you would have no problem with a second grader's two mommies being acknowledged in class in the same way as every other family in the class, right? Crayon drawings of the family that get hung on the wall, talking about what their families did for summer vacation, etc?Not a bigot. And not homophobic. I say, as adults, go live your lives and be happy. But we're talking about 5-8 year olds. Who are still in early stages of their mental development and VERY impressionable. Don't like the term? Call it something else. Just leave the sexuality/gender talk at home where it belongs. With the parents.
No one has mentioned "sex ed for babies". No one. Not one single person.If the other side runs what they currently got it will be 80-20 for the Governor. They won’t even need to mention sex Ed for babies .
Sorry. I saw a curriculum, chart and thought I was quoting your response to the person who posted it.I wasn't talking about the chart in the comment you quoted?
And no, I am definitely not tuned into "the kids." I have never been far left. I don't like either extreme. I had to unfollow things like "huffpost gay voices" because the articles were ridiculous and the comments were worse. I've been disparaged for being cisgendered (identifying as the sex I was born) and for being male, being white, and marrying another white man.
So you would have no problem with a second grader's two mommies being acknowledged in class in the same way as every other family in the class, right? Crayon drawings of the family that get hung on the wall, talking about what their families did for summer vacation, etc?
We've gone through this before. Let's do it again."Gay" is not in the bill. Not acknowledging gay people is not in the bill. What is in the bill is "Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards."
Why not wait until children are more mentally mature before discussing those subjects. What is your obsession with sex and children?
I remember doing those drawings in school.So you would have no problem with a second grader's two mommies being acknowledged in class in the same way as every other family in the class, right? Crayon drawings of the family that get hung on the wall, talking about what their families did for summer vacation, etc?
I think "both sides" here are sort of exaggerating the amount of roundtable discussion that happens in second grade classrooms.So you would have no problem with a second grader's two mommies being acknowledged in class in the same way as every other family in the class, right? Crayon drawings of the family that get hung on the wall, talking about what their families did for summer vacation, etc?
The grooming nonsense comes straight from DeSantis:Anti-grooming? Seriously? Where did you get that?
And if you think "discussion on sexuality, gender, etc. doesn't belong in a public school classroom with 5-8 year olds" "full stop" then you are a prime candidate for enrolling your children in private schools or home schooling.
Society at large cannot cater to irrational fears of nothing.
Anger at discrimination is appropriate and justifiable. Why aren't you angry?This thread went off the rails. There seems to be a handful of quite angry folks. Good luck to all.
Refer them to the guidance counselor.How should a teacher respond when Suzie says "I want to be a boy and my mom won't let me"?
I am not "on TikTok" but I may need to put my company on there at some point. Facebook shows me some TikTok videos as part of the "reels" feature. So does Instagram. Obviously, it's not all "filth." I've seen recipes, workout tips, silly dances everyone is replicating, etc.You guys are kind of making our case on this point.
TikTok is filth. There are teachers who are active on TikTok and participate in the filth. If you ban your kids from TikTok and choose not to do it yourself, that's not going to do you any good if your kid's teacher is a wannabe TikTok star herself.
Just be aware that there are security issues with the app. I wouldn't install it on a device that has any private information.Anger at discrimination is appropriate and justifiable. Why aren't you angry?
Refer them to the guidance counselor.
I am not "on TikTok" but I may need to put my company on there at some point. Facebook shows me some TikTok videos as part of the "reels" feature. So does Instagram. Obviously, it's not all "filth." I've seen recipes, workout tips, silly dances everyone is replicating, etc.
Like any other platform, it is what you make of it. I certainly don't seek out "the weird stuff" and I don't know why anyone does. Parents have the choice to keep their kids off TikTok or anything else. And kids will get around it to some degree, like everything else.
Thank you for this. I’m American, but I’ve spent years reading about how these issues are approached in Europe, and especially in the Netherlands, which to me has always seemed to be the gold standard in approaches to education surrounding sexuality.
America is still so puritanical in so many ways, to the extent that people will tell children stories about storks to avoid what should be totally innocuous facts of human biology.
I don’t really have a point, but I suppose I wish my countrymen could see how ridiculous we look to the rest of the world. I know I remember reading about how absurdly bowdlerized The Making of Me seemed to European guests, and that fact alone helped change my perspective.
(Also, this strain of isolationist counter-culturalism in American society that manifests in attempts to place legal gags on teachers and, in extreme cases, ideologically-charged homeschooling, is very concerning to me. But then America’s glorification of individualism has always been a double-edged sword…)
It’s amazing how nobody wants to address this issue. Nobody will provide even a hypothetical explanation for why those amendments were insufficient.So hey, an amendment was proposed to this bill banning all discussion of sex acts in K-3. This bill's legislative supporters voted it down (twice, once in the house and once in the senate). Why? Do you think supporters of this bill want to talk about sex with children?
This I would not support. I also find it difficult to believe it occurs other than in bizarre exceptions that should be dealt with appropriately. I'm sure it's not part of any lesson plan.Right but some of the activist teacher types are planting the seeds of gender dysphoria
This I have no problem with. This is the reality of the world around you.If 99% of kindergartners saw the word "ze" on the page, they would look at you like you had six heads. Then they'd ask what it means, and in explaining it, math class just became a de facto lesson in gender identity.
I dont know the grade system in the US. What's the age of this grade?The chart states it's for 5th grade, which is when many students start puberty.
In general, grade plus 5 equals age.I dont know the grade system in the US. What's the age of this grade?
10-11. My younger son is a 5th-grader.I dont know the grade system in the US. What's the age of this grade?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.