I disagree. I think the media energized the cast. I looked at the bill, and I don't see what is being portrayed. I keep asking for someone to point me in the right direction, but no one seems willing to do so. Am I looking at the wrong bill?
Can you point me to the correct bill please?
It is unfortunate that possibly thousands of guests Spring Break vacation schedules at WDW parks and resorts may be affected if the passionate cast stage a mass walk out next week to get their message across on the upcoming bill that DeSantis is expected to sign. Last time I checked in general we get our news info from the media reporting on stories. I know some media folks that report with honesty and integrity however no group is perfect by any means.
Hi Lilo. Could you point me in the right direction? I read the entire bill @TP2000 posted. That doesn't seem to be what is being discussed though. So can you link me to the correct thing? I am a bit lost.
If you read the link posted from a member Ian, whereischapek , that's summarizes what the cast are thinking about.
I don't see a user by that name.
I don't care how many education degrees you have. (I have one, too.)
It was suggested to change the text of the bill to the above so as to "not marginalize anyone". The author's response was that such a move would "gut the bill"...the purpose is specifically to marginalize people. See the full article in the link.
Any FL elected official that voted for the Don't Say Gay Bill including DeSantis who is expected to sign in into law better think twice about attending a future Gay PRIDE parade in hopes of trying to earn some LGBTQ and their supporters votes. That would be hypocritical if that happens.
Again you can say Gay in FLorida schools!
You might want to READ before you accuse someone of something you did yourself...or do you have difficulty understanding words? The below is pulled directly from the article itself.
As much as you are trying to convey some sass in your response I actually read the bill not some article with bias. I go to the source. Also for you other question try google.
Yes can you imagine if someone tried this same response but used Karma and HIV and not karma and tornadoes ??? Probably wouldn’t be very received here and yet here we are ! Also before the shrills come out I am not saying either are OK especially my example it’s just that an example.
I think the bill must say something else. Because the breathless coverage and social media outrage don’t seem to match up with the text of the bill.
So, you're not going to take the word of the bill's author (those were direct quotes in the article). Interesting. How about I show you some videos of him talking about how he feels about LGBTQ+ people? (Here's a hint - it's not good, and further clarifies that the purpose of the bill is to marginalize that community.)
Clearly the cameras are biased and making him repeatedly say things he doesn’t really mean.
The number of people choosing to ignore what's right in front of their faces and buy into propaganda is staggering.
