Angel Ariel
Well-Known Member
Easier said than done, in the Washington example provided the parents complained to the school and the school said it didn’t violate any laws so they let the posters stay.
That’s how we end up with legislation like this, a couple teachers push the limits by going outside approved curriculum, parents complain, the school districts say there’s no law against it, and the parents start the process of implementing laws to address what should have been handled on an individual level.
When parents feel they don’t have a voice at the school the only recourse is going above the schools.
I won't speak for anywhere else, but my district is having serious issues with everything that you're talking about here, and the bolded sentence represents a VERY small, but vocal (with national media connections), set of parents. I hear that they don't feel heard - but they are also not representing the vast majority of parents. Their media connections - and, factually speaking - political funding - are allowing them to amplify the message and make it *seem* like they are a large majority, when in fact they are the opposite. A small set of vocal, well-funded and connected parents should not be determining access to curricula for all students.
(and that's not acknowledging that the poster referenced in Washington wasn't curriculum. And could have/should have been addressed on a teacher level. Perhaps there is a gender non-conforming child in the class that the teacher is supporting. Another family shouldn't have the right to say the classroom must remove representative/supporting material for another student. As someone else said - you can't control everything your child is exposed to. Prepare to have the conversations according to your beliefs at your home - that's our job as parents. )
Last edited: