News Big Thunder Mountain to receive full retrack

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Yeah, long-term view makes sense for Big Thunder to go down first as much as we all want SM to receive a refurb.

It seems like Disney still needs time to figure out what exactly Tomorrowland should become (hence the lack of anything DL-related as well), so they can tackle both coasts at the same time.
Because they’ve “figured out” Frontierland/Liberty Square?
 

Andrew25

Well-Known Member
Because they’ve “figured out” Frontierland/Liberty Square?
They've made a mess of Frontierland, but they've determined what will happen there. Whether or not we agree with it is a separate discussion. Disney is still trying to figure out the Tomorrowland problem. That's why they've decided to work on the western side of the park versus the eastern side.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
They've made a mess of Frontierland, but they've determined what will happen there. Whether or not we agree with it is a separate discussion. Disney is still trying to figure out the Tomorrowland problem. That's why they've decided to work on the western side of the park versus the eastern side.
I guess I should have been more clear: these are not appreciable improvements to the area, and I wish they’d stop.
 

Trauma

Well-Known Member
Its actually not gone you just need to keep refreshing. I was there on a super busy day earlier this week and had no issues finding times even when it said “not available” at first.
This is not true. I even have standby skipper searching for me. Some rides never became available. Yes I was able to book additional rides but it’s not like you get off one ride and hop on the next unless you ride a bunch of smaller rides.

I found it most useful to get 3-4 rides in the morning then stack 3 more later in the day.

However to achieve this experience you either have to pay for an outside service like Standby Skipper or you need to be glued to your phone.

Either way it’s a sub par experience for what it costs, and your average guest won’t be getting max value out of it.

Disney needs to fix this service.
 

JMcMahonEsq

Well-Known Member
I'm not disputing the fact it needs maintenance just the time frame comparison
Why in the world would you think that a maintenance/replacement job on an existing ride, in the middle of an active theme park, would have any bearing/relationship on new construction of a hotel? Talk about trying to make an apples to sheep comparison, let alone apples to oranges.
 

TheCoasterNerd

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
In the Parks
No
Got my info off the web
Well, the fact is there are very strong reasons this takes so long, there's a long line of historical coaster renovations taking this long, and I feel like the experts probably know better than the internet.
Another example is my home park, Busch Gardens Williamsburg, took 6 months to replace about half the track and add tv's and a statue (although even that wasn't ready for reopening day) so it would make sense that replacing the full track and a lot of the theming of a coaster that is so integrated into rockwork might take a year. It's not a Disney thing, it's a roller coaster thing.
 

LSLS

Well-Known Member
That’s not true. 18 - 24 months is typical for design, manufacturing and installation of a new roller coaster.

This not being new means there’s a whole selective demolition process.
I think wood coasters are faster than that, but point remains, it's a longer process being not a start from scratch for this refurb. I certainly get on Disney for a lot of things, but I don't think a year (give or take a few months) is unreasonable. If this extends into the Fall of 2026, maybe then the conversation can be revisited.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom