Brian_WDW74
Member
Here's the problem.
1. I can't find any evidence that Science Magazine published any such article.
2. The WND, as you show, claims that the study was published "today."
3. Through Google, I've found many people claiming that "an article published in Science Magazine" supports the abiotic theory going back several years.
All of which leads me to believe this is just one of those misstatements that comes up periodically. An urban legend, if you will.
Yes, there was an article published today by Science Magazine. But I'm not sure it's quite as earth-shattering as WND makes it out to be:
Abiogenic Hydrocarbon Production at Lost City Hydrothermal Field