Avengers Campus - Reactions / Reviews

[Mike S]

It’s worth pointing out that Spider-Man (while sharing the IP) is not positioned to be the main draw. In fact, it’s very much the tertiary one.

The success depends on the whole package (The new Avengers ride, GoTG AND Spider-Man) being more impressive than Universal’s four rides.

Well this is what happens when they can’t decide on the big attraction and then seemingly cobble anything together so they can say they have a Marvel Land before the big ride is done. Imo the whole thing should’ve been held back on until all of it was top notch. Have they even started construction on Avengers at all yet?

 

[Mickeyboof]

Every single ride *should* be so beloved by the executives, that they feel each individually could be the main draw to the land.

This new wave of “this is the filler ride, the real one is coming” is abolsutely a bore.

 

[BrianLo]

Every single ride *should* be so beloved by the executives, that they feel each individually could be the main draw to the land.

This new wave of “this is the filler ride, the real one is coming” is abolsutely a bore.

What? The whole tiering of attractions solely originates back with Walt.

Every attraction is not, nor does it need to be an E-ticket.

Whether the tiered attractions should all open years apart from one another, is another debate. One I think Disney knows they lost with Galaxies Edge.

 

[Californian Elitist]

It’s worth pointing out that Spider-Man (while sharing the IP) is not positioned to be the main draw. In fact, it’s very much the tertiary one.

The success depends on the whole package (The new Avengers ride, GoTG AND Spider-Man) being more impressive than Universal’s four rides.

No excuse for a boring and terrible ride though.

Hopefully it’s not either of those things.

 

[Disney Analyst]

Just to remind, as I know some can’t stand what happened to ToT, but when this land is fully done it will have two major e-tickets and a d-ticket attraction with e-ticket waits.

 

[SuddenStorm]

 

[Mickeyboof]

What? The whole tiering of attractions solely originates back with Walt.

Every attraction is not, nor does it need to be an E-ticket.

Whether the tiered attractions should all open years apart from one another, is another debate. One I think Disney knows they lost with Galaxies Edge.

And yet, each tiny little fantasyland attraction is so charming and lovely, each individually carries the land.

Tiering doesn’t matter. It’s about quality. Quality doesn’t mean E ticket.

Now, that is something Walt taught us.

 

[The Grand Inquisitor]

Could we see any Fantastic Four ride at the land if the movie is really successful? I would love to see a Baxter Building ride where we fly in the fantasticar to stop Dr Doom or another FF villain. The ride building could be the baxter building with meet and greets with the group.

 

[BrianLo]

And yet, each tiny little fantasyland attraction is so charming and lovely, each individually carries the land.

Tiering doesn’t matter. It’s about quality. Quality doesn’t mean E ticket.

Now, that is something Walt taught us.

I never made a single comment on quality...

The fantasyland attractions are great, none of them are objectively an E-ticket. None of them headline a land. The sheer volume does. Just look to all the other castle parks that have half the volume of Fantasyland dark rides and people complain!

My original point (which you’ve just danced around and ignored) comes down to people are upset this attraction isn’t an E-ticket like Universal’s. I was merely pointing out it isn’t supposed to be. We literally have no idea if it will or will not be a quality attraction, we just know it isn’t an E-ticket.

But I personally don’t use the ticketing system to make a judgement on quality. It’s just scope and scale. So maybe that’s why I confused you.

 

[Ismael Flores]

I'm reasonably sure that you did not intend to to write teat videos.

this stupid phone needs to be replaced or my fingers are too big. auto correct keeps changing my words

 

[Ismael Flores]

Well this is what happens when they can’t decide on the big attraction and then seemingly cobble anything together so they can say they have a Marvel Land before the big ride is done. Imo the whole thing should’ve been held back on until all of it was top notch. Have they even started construction on Avengers at all yet?

They are doing same mistake as SWGE. opening the land with the C/D ticket and forgetting the main draw of the e ticket

 

[Mike S]

They are doing same mistake as SWGE. opening the ride with the C/D ticket and forgetting the main draw

At least with Star Wars the big ride was built and the original intention was to open all of it. There was just unforeseen complications.

With Marvel the big ride hasn’t even started construction yet.

 

[D.Silentu]

This is true, but if the reason for the delay is to avoid a capacity gridlock, as seen at
"Rise of the Resistance," then I can excuse the postponement.

 

[Animaniac93-98]

It’s worth pointing out that Spider-Man (while sharing the IP) is not positioned to be the main draw. In fact, it’s very much the tertiary one.

The success depends on the whole package (The new Avengers ride, GoTG AND Spider-Man) being more impressive than Universal’s four rides.

Maybe one day Universal will finally add a 5th ride to IoA's Marvel Land.

Like an Spider-Man themed octopus flat ride!

 

[Mike S]

This is true, but if the reason for the delay is to avoid a capacity gridlock, as seen at
"Rise of the Resistance," then I can excuse the postponement.

You’re never going to avoid demand for a popular ride. If that’s the reason for the delay it’s basically just kicking the can down the road. Also you’ll never truly know how a ride will work until it’s actually built and you’re testing it. Humans are flawed by our very nature. Designing something like how complex this ride sounds will never be perfect no matter how much time they spend in pre-planning.

 

[D.Silentu]

New things will be popular of course. However, from what I gather efficient capacity was never a consideration for Galaxy's Edge. If the rumors are to be believed and the Avengers ride is coming later because they are now more concerned with that, I don't mind the land opening in phases. As you say, no one can be sure how effective a ride will be until opening day, but I find it encouraging that the topic is getting addressed.

 

[ToTBellHop]

This is true, but if the reason for the delay is to avoid a capacity gridlock, as seen at
"Rise of the Resistance," then I can excuse the postponement.

That’s not the reason for the delay.

 

[D.Silentu]

Oh, it was my understanding that the delay was caused by a reconfiguring of the ride system to allow for higher capacity. What is the actual reason?

 

[BubbaisSleep]

Th

At least with Star Wars the big ride was built and the original intention was to open all of it. There was just unforeseen complications.

With Marvel the big ride hasn’t even started construction yet.

This, added with the fact this land is unique in having an e-ticket already open before the land. With the third Guadians movie on the way, they can always upgrade this one maybe even before the actual Avengers ride opens.

 

[The Grand Inquisitor]

So whats Disney's plan regarding Black Panther for the land? Will he have a big presence due to how popular he is? Also does Disney have plans in case other franchises like the Fantastic Four and Eternals are very popular they could add them to the land?