lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
I discussed this not too long ago. The conversation ends around page 228.Bet you are pleased they never built a dragon coaster/quest for the unicorn!
I discussed this not too long ago. The conversation ends around page 228.Bet you are pleased they never built a dragon coaster/quest for the unicorn!
I would say for the Most part that is true. But honestly what I find most amazing about Disney is there NON-Disneyesque things to do! for instance....ANYTHING without characters from Disney movies or tv shows I find awesome. I don't just go all the way to florida to experience a place filled with Disney characters. I go there because I feel the theming and entertainment is VERY good. UNI has been getting better but Disney is still my favorite. Sure anything Disney makes is Disney but they have used franchises in the past that Werent Disney at the time and I love those rides to death. Star Tours, Indiana Jones Adventure, GMR, RNRC, Muppet Vision just to name a few. Idk how everyone else feels but I don't just go to Disney to see Disney. For me I go to Magic Kingdom to see Disney. In terms of true Disney!I saw Song of the South as a kid (well after 1946 - not THAT old!), but didn't remember a thing about it when I first rode Splash. I loved the ride.
Someone else said that if Iger would trust that Disney is appealing enough, they could spend those billions elsewhere. ITA.
They don't need to go buy other things to try to compete with Uni. They just need to do their own thing.
People go to Disney for DISNEY.
. LOL, i know how you feel!UGH. this thread irritates me....but its addicting so....
Because it fits the AK so well, is Disney and was a wonderful movie. It works well on all counts....anyways WHY would a pride land from LION KING be ANY better than AVATAR???? it would be like two Africa sections. "Hey everyone right this way to cartoon Africa featuring the Lion King and this way to real Africa for a real safari!" I am sorry but I would really dislike that!
I agree with you there; I was just pointing out an oversight on his part.
It's Hamlet with animals. The environment of the Pride Lands already exists inside the Harambe Wildlife Reserve. Being "Disney" or a wonderful movie are not very strong criteria.Because it fits the AK so well, is Disney and was a wonderful movie. It works well on all.
They are to me. If one wants their own opinion, they don't need boards for that, so I assume one wants other people's opinions when asking questions.It's Hamlet with animals. The environment of the Pride Lands already exists inside the Harambe Wildlife Reserve. Being "Disney" or a wonderful movie are not very strong criteria.
Because they can easily be part of the same land? Or do you not know what the word "conjunction" means? (Sorry had to go there) Never did I say it was gonna be TWO Africa's (Which by the way WDW already has, forgot about Epcot?). Either way it's an idea, plain and simple. Is it really necessary for you to shoot people down for it? And IMO it's a far more realistic idea than "Pandora". Some may want "Pandora" while others may not, let's leave it at that. Some of you seriously take things extremely out of proportion.UGH. this thread irritates me....but its addicting so....anyways WHY would a pride land from LION KING be ANY better than AVATAR???? it would be like two Africa sections. "Hey everyone right this way to cartoon Africa featuring the Lion King and this way to real Africa for a real safari!" I am sorry but I would really dislike that!
UGH. this thread irritates me....but its addicting so....anyways WHY would a pride land from LION KING be ANY better than AVATAR???? it would be like two Africa sections. "Hey everyone right this way to cartoon Africa featuring the Lion King and this way to real Africa for a real safari!" I am sorry but I would really dislike that!
There was a rumor a while back that Kevin would appear in Flights of Wonder. I would love to see Kevin and Dug represented somehow in the parks, but I'm not sure how.
There was a rumor a while back that Kevin would appear in Flights of Wonder. I would love to see Kevin and Dug represented somehow in the parks, but I'm not sure how.
.....I never shot down the idea. I asked the question "Why would it be better!" I am sorry but I don't take this that seriously. And to further prove my point. WE HAVE TOO MUCH AFRICA! even though Epcots , IMO, does not count. It would be like HALF of the park dedicated to Africa, Its wildlife, And animated films based out of it. Its just not for me. But take my comment as you wish.Because they can easily be part of the same land? Or do you not know what the word "conjunction" means? (Sorry had to go there) Never did I say it was gonna be TWO Africa's (Which by the way WDW already has, forgot about Epcot?). Either way it's an idea, plain and simple. Is it really necessary for you to shoot people down for it? And IMO it's a far more realistic idea than "Pandora". Some may want "Pandora" while others may not, let's leave it at that. Some of you seriously take things extremely out of proportion.
I disagree with Avatar just being special effects. I watched it again recently and I liked it a lot. It wasn't the best movie by any means but I still felt something and felt bad for the characters in there circumstances! it really does portray an amazing message about conservation and protection of the natural world! and family bonds of course!. LOL, i know how you feel!
Because it fits the AK so well, is Disney and was a wonderful movie. It works well on all counts.
Avatar is just a movie that had good special effect.
that what i dont understand about some of these arguments..avatar is not about blue people fighting earthlings lol..its about family, saving your planet, and close family ties..great themes for story tellingI disagree with Avatar just being special effects. I watched it again recently and I liked it a lot. It wasn't the best movie by any means but I still felt something and felt bad for the characters in there circumstances! it really does portray an amazing message about conservation and protection of the natural world! and family bonds of course!
Avatar is based on a imagined world with floating mountains and you think that's realistic? LOL alright, I have officially ejected myself away from this outrageous conversation......I never shot down the idea. I asked the question "Why would it be better!" I am sorry but I don't take this that seriously. And to further prove my point. WE HAVE TOO MUCH AFRICA! even though Epcots , IMO, does not count. It would be like HALF of the park dedicated to Africa, Its wildlife, And animated films based out of it. Its just not for me. But take my comment as you wish.
.....but seriously. Lion King more realistic than Avatar???? now we have taken this conversation to a WHOLE new level of craziness!
i think he s saying its no more real than talking lions...Avatar is based on a imagined world with floating mountains and you think that's realistic? LOL alright, I have officially ejected myself away from this outrageous conversation.
There was a rumor a while back that Kevin would appear in Flights of Wonder. I would love to see Kevin and Dug represented somehow in the parks, but I'm not sure how.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.