As a single traveler, I have a hard time attempting to compare costs. When I traveled with a family the prices were a lot lower overall, but, still a challenge to the budget and required a thought out decision before spending that much on anything. Back in 2008, I took a one week Disney trip and paid for my entire extended family. I paid the airfare, housing and tickets for (at the time) my two daughters, two Son's in law, and three grandchildren (over 6 years old), and my at the time lady friend.** We each basically paid around the same amounts for food. We didn't stay on site, I had rented an incredible 5 bedroom villa just about a mile off Disney property. Had two rental cars, besides my own (I drove down from Vermont). BTW, those were 7 day, park hopper, non-expiring tickets for all. The total cost to me was $7800.00. That was for just 7 days.
Last October, my sister and I went to Europe. She flew into Paris via Vermont and I via North Carolina, rented an apartment for 4 days in Central Paris, went to Disneyland Paris for a day, explored museums and tourist spots around Paris before flying to Venice. Three days there and hoped a train for Rome. Again rented an apartment near the train station for 5 days. We went all over Rome via subway, did a paid tour of the Roman Forum and Coliseum, St. Peters, Sistine Chapel, Audience with the Pope, Trevi Fountain took a train and toured the ruins of Pompei. We then caught another train to the port of Rome and boarded a transatlantic cruise for a two week cruise that included stops in places like Barcelona, Palma de Mallorca, Tenerife and other ports of call. A solid week of sailing the Atlantic with entertainment and activities and enough food to be almost obscene (well, not really almost, it was obscene). The Cruise brought us back to Fort Lauderdale. I flew back to North Caroline and she flew back to Vermont. We shared expenses except individual purchases for souvenirs, gambling, etc. was $9100.00 *** Factor in that there was just two of us and not nine people which would obviously been a lot more expensive, but as a personal expense for me, out of my money, it was $4550.00 approximately. Thirty days, thousands of miles traveled, three meals a day, touring, local transportation.
I have read on other threads where a family of four staying onsite could easily pay $7000.00+ for one week at Disney. Multiply that by four weeks and you have $28000.00. A family of four on the exact trip to Europe I was on would have been $18200.00. Of course, I didn't get to go on any dark rides although a few of the subway rides during rush hour were quite intimate.
My sister and my nephew were also on the trip with us, but, paid their own way.That number also included all our expenses, personal or shared.
You are the only person who mentioned Tauck. Tauck, ABD, and Viking are all high end tours where people stay in high end accommodations and high end access on their excursions. But there are many tour agencies that offer tours that are a lot less expensive.The last several pages have been people trying to claim, and prove, that companies such as ABD and Tauck are marketing to the same target audience as WDW
You are the only person who mentioned Tauck. Tauck, ABD, and Viking are all high end tours where people stay in high end accommodations and high end access on their excursions. But there are many tour agencies that offer tours that are a lot less expensive.
In this thread, you've asked people to show evidence of WDW and European river cruises marketing to the same markets. That was provided. Now it's your turn: can you please provide quotes for anyone who said anything remotely similar to this quote?Yes, because all of those "a lot of people " are now suddenly saying -
"$3500-$5000 is not a good value for Disney. Let's go spend $15,000-$20000 on a guided Europe tour!"
You keep asking for others to provide proof of their statements and they have. So, where's your proof?There's no way that Disney World is losing a noticeable difference in attendance to either one.
I don't think a lot of people walked away because they couldn't afford as much as they wouldn't afford it. It seems pretty reasonable to me that someone would say "If we're spending that much for Disney we might as well go to Ireland."
I'd need to page @SorcererMC for that. She's good at finding stats. I don't know what the average income is for WDW vacationers, vs the Tauck/ABD average profile. I also don't know the percentage of luxury tour families, or $15k+ vacations, when looking at an overall travel market of Americans.You keep asking for others to provide proof of their statements and they have. So, where's your proof?
Man, lot of missing posts in this thread. Be strong Dan, do not click "show ignored content".
I don't like being disappointed in what we can't do 6 months before we arrive.
A few points, for what they're worth:
1. Find someone in your family who loves tech to do the ADRs and FPs. Like most tech, once you use it once, it becomes easy.
2. Most ADRs are not set in stone. We've been late and early and had no problem getting in.
3. Even some FPs have some flexibility. On New Year's Eve, the busiest night of the year, we were 4 hours late for our Test Track FP, and still got on once the CM heard our hotel and cruise line sob story.
4. Europe gets expensive for families if you want non stop flights, hotel rooms with AC, something for the kids to do like swimming, and other incidentals. Our larger "American Style" hotel rooms generally exceeded $400 per night, and sometimes much higher for our family of 4 in Europe.
5. Europe can be done very cheaply if you stay in lesser hotels, walk everywhere, use railpasses, and/or find cheap flights (like I did as a college student). My wife and I would be fine with that, but do you want to do that with kids in tow?
6. River cruises are evolving, just like ocean cruises did a couple decades ago. Going on a Caribbean family cruise, especially with littler kids, was basically unheard of until Disney came along. River cruises will very likely make a similar metamorphosis soon, but I don't think stalwarts like Viking will be changing their demographic, just like Holland America, Princess and Cunard still shun kids. Plus, river boats, because of their smaller size, probably have to specially built for family vacationers. You can't retrofit a Viking river boat to install a splash zone.
7. WDW is probably trying to knock out the riff raff. Not to be snooty, but fewer and fewer people that Jeff Foxworthy talks about seem to be hitting the Disney parks. Pricing them out, apparently, is not a bad thing in the eyes of management. Perhaps the income and educational levels of Disney guests are all higher than they used to be. I don't know.
8. In the same vein, the push toward DVC guests is huge. This brings people back year after year, and also again ups the likely income and educational levels of the overall guest demographic. I could sell my Boardwalk points right now for a very strong 25% profit even though I only bought there about 3 years ago. That demand has gone up dramatically, and I have no idea why. It may have to do with the fact that Boardwalk is exceptionally convenient for people who like World Showcase, which is definitely not the Foxworthy crowd.
Overall, WDW seems to be heading toward premium vacationers. Back when the value resorts came along, Disney truly tried to make a WDW vacation affordable for everyone. Now, they seem to be catering more toward the well-heeled. I do not believe the current ad campaign even mentions price, but instead focuses on the magic, the service, and the Grand Floridian concierges with fairy wings. Where's the "Family of 4 with park hopper can stay for $1,200" ad? Face it, 6 Flags and other parks can be the more affordable alternatives to WDW, and that's where the egalitarian conscience seems to be sated. Put another way, any guilt that Disney may feel for turning away poorer guests goes away when options at non-Disney parks are considered.
As Iger essentially said, let's cut the crowds, but keep the fat wallet carriers happy. Why corral 30,000 sweaty and over-crowded guests when we can make the same money with 20,000 happier (and richer) guests? Cadillac doesn't want everyone to buy an Eldorado. They want a certain demographic to buy an Eldorado and make more money off of each of them.
Wait, you mean they have hotels without AC?
I remember that too -- it was really fun! I loved making dining reservations by videophone.Talk about nostalgia... when my kids were small (back when we went to WDW at least twice a year) they had a reservations center under Spaceship Earth.
As Iger essentially said, let's cut the crowds, but keep the fat wallet carriers happy. Why corral 30,000 sweaty and over-crowded guests when we can make the same money with 20,000 happier (and richer) guests?
I was there for the Arts Festival and I must say that I think the prices are too high for a "scoop" of food, families are now choosing what events are worth the cost...other parks in the area are giving a better deal on their "festivals" and a higher discounts for most of their products, meals and drinks...concerts are much longer which mean more "bang for your buck" ...Any ideas, you go first
I asked you to furnish proof that Disney was not losing business to Tauck or ABD or any other travel option, nothing else. You stated :I'd need to page @SorcererMC for that. She's good at finding stats. I don't know what the average income is for WDW vacationers, vs the Tauck/ABD average profile. I also don't know the percentage of luxury tour families, or $15k+ vacations, when looking at an overall travel market of Americans.
I think I read an article in Forbes once that said the avg American spends between $1500-$5k for an annual vacation. I could be a little off on the numbers, and of course that's an average, but I don't think $10k-$15k+ vacations have ever been or ever will be a large segment.
ETA, Again, if someone claimed Atlantis has had a bit of an impact..or targeting the same audience..I would probably be more inclined to agree, bc the cost is still in the realm of comparable, and feasible for "average" Disney World travelers. (I think, I don't have statistics on avg WDW travelers lol). But Atlantis is about a 5k trip. Although you could do it for a little less or a lot more. Most importantly- no minimum age requirement. Plenty to do for young children.
hen people proceeded to post articles about Tauck and ABD to prove that they're marketing to families. They are marketing to a certain group of families, not your avg WDW exclusive, or even average family, vacationer.
There's no way that Disney World is losing a noticeable difference in attendance to either one.
Where's the "Family of 4 with park hopper can stay for $1,200" ad? Face it, 6 Flags and other parks can be the more affordable alternatives to WDW, and that's where the egalitarian conscience seems to be sated....
Here is the closest you can get to "bargain Disney" offers. $1675 for 4 days and 4 nights off site at non peak times with the new 4 park ticket. I guess it's up to interpretation what this means about how their crowds are and whether their luxury push is paying off as hoped.A few points, for what they're worth:
1. Find someone in your family who loves tech to do the ADRs and FPs. Like most tech, once you use it once, it becomes easy.
2. Most ADRs are not set in stone. We've been late and early and had no problem getting in.
3. Even some FPs have some flexibility. On New Year's Eve, the busiest night of the year, we were 4 hours late for our Test Track FP, and still got on once the CM heard our hotel and cruise line sob story.
4. Europe gets expensive for families if you want non stop flights, hotel rooms with AC, something for the kids to do like swimming, and other incidentals. Our larger "American Style" hotel rooms generally exceeded $400 per night, and sometimes much higher for our family of 4 in Europe.
5. Europe can be done very cheaply if you stay in lesser hotels, walk everywhere, use railpasses, and/or find cheap flights (like I did as a college student). My wife and I would be fine with that, but do you want to do that with kids in tow?
6. River cruises are evolving, just like ocean cruises did a couple decades ago. Going on a Caribbean family cruise, especially with littler kids, was basically unheard of until Disney came along. River cruises will very likely make a similar metamorphosis soon, but I don't think stalwarts like Viking will be changing their demographic, just like Holland America, Princess and Cunard still shun kids. Plus, river boats, because of their smaller size, probably have to specially built for family vacationers. You can't retrofit a Viking river boat to install a splash zone.
7. WDW is probably trying to knock out the riff raff. Not to be snooty, but fewer and fewer people that Jeff Foxworthy talks about seem to be hitting the Disney parks. Pricing them out, apparently, is not a bad thing in the eyes of management. Perhaps the income and educational levels of Disney guests are all higher than they used to be. I don't know.
8. In the same vein, the push toward DVC guests is huge. This brings people back year after year, and also again ups the likely income and educational levels of the overall guest demographic. I could sell my Boardwalk points right now for a very strong 25% profit even though I only bought there about 3 years ago. That demand has gone up dramatically, and I have no idea why. It may have to do with the fact that Boardwalk is exceptionally convenient for people who like World Showcase, which is definitely not the Foxworthy crowd.
Overall, WDW seems to be heading toward premium vacationers. Back when the value resorts came along, Disney truly tried to make a WDW vacation affordable for everyone. Now, they seem to be catering more toward the well-heeled. I do not believe the current ad campaign even mentions price, but instead focuses on the magic, the service, and the Grand Floridian concierges with fairy wings. Where's the "Family of 4 with park hopper can stay for $1,200" ad? Face it, 6 Flags and other parks can be the more affordable alternatives to WDW, and that's where the egalitarian conscience seems to be sated. Put another way, any guilt that Disney may feel for turning away poorer guests goes away when options at non-Disney parks are considered.
As Iger essentially said, let's cut the crowds, but keep the fat wallet carriers happy. Why corral 30,000 sweaty and over-crowded guests when we can make the same money with 20,000 happier (and richer) guests? Cadillac doesn't want everyone to buy an Eldorado. They want a certain demographic to buy an Eldorado and make more money off of each of them.
I once went to WDW with a couple from northern Ohio who complained the whole time about the lack of big rollercoasters, their annoyance at having to "sit down at a restaurant at an amusement park" and how pricey the restaurants at World Showcase were, and how "Cedar Point is way more fun than this". I think that if your "ROI" for your vacation comes down to the number of coasters you can get on for your dollar, and you couldn't care less about the nostalgia & storytelling of Haunted Mansion or Pirates... well, have fun at Six Flags, because you're a much different person than ISome in Texas might compare that to the much lower cost of 5 days on the riverwalk in San Antonio with tickets to Fiesta Texas or 5 days in DFW with tickets to Six Flags and feel like it's a much better "value".............
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.