HM Spectre
Well-Known Member
The issue is that the powers that be are taking the wrong side of the fence when it comes to increasing profitability at WDW. It used to be about maintaining a standard of excellence and innovating to get better for the future. Now, it’s about cutting corners and costs while delivering just enough to keep the general uninformed public content.
They COULD pay a maintenance man to clean the monorails every night but if the general public isn’t going to notice, cutting that guy (and whatever he would need to keep it spotless) represents a short-term savings (because over the long haul, it’s cheaper to do good maintenance than replace). So long as that kind of move represents a savings in the “now” and goes relatively unnoticed, the suits will keep doing it over and over and over until you have WDW today. Watering down the Disney standard saves money in the short term which means goals met which then means raises and bonuses.
“Relatively unnoticed” is the reason why it’s not just enough to stop buying tickets and APs. Most people on these boards are in the minority in that they notice slight dips in quality but they also make up a tiny percentage of the Disney ticket base. Joe Blow going to Disney for the first time probably isn’t going to notice the wear and tear on the monorail unless it’s pointed out to him.
That’s why it would be so much more impactful for things like this to go viral. Everyone in this thread is saying that the mold and dirt, etc. are gross. What happens if the public suddenly becomes aware of some of the nastier things that have gone under the radar… some of the shoddier repairs and the diminished quality that previously went unnoticed? What happens if it causes a public uproar that gets to the upper offices at Disney? What if those people then decide to go to Universal in droves? When the average uninformed Joe (their bread and butter target audience) is getting upset, suddenly it’s a BIG issue.
If it becomes big enough, it could do legitimate damage to their numbers and THAT is when change would start to happen. Right now, they’re being cheap and half-hearted with their attitudes towards maintenance and show quality because they can get away with it… what they’re doing is working for the bottom line right now… show quality (and future prospects) be damned. IF the decreased standards decrease revenue enough to hurt them vs. the saved expense, then you’ll see an uptick in quality. But that is a BIG, ugly sorcerer’s hat sized IF.
They COULD pay a maintenance man to clean the monorails every night but if the general public isn’t going to notice, cutting that guy (and whatever he would need to keep it spotless) represents a short-term savings (because over the long haul, it’s cheaper to do good maintenance than replace). So long as that kind of move represents a savings in the “now” and goes relatively unnoticed, the suits will keep doing it over and over and over until you have WDW today. Watering down the Disney standard saves money in the short term which means goals met which then means raises and bonuses.
“Relatively unnoticed” is the reason why it’s not just enough to stop buying tickets and APs. Most people on these boards are in the minority in that they notice slight dips in quality but they also make up a tiny percentage of the Disney ticket base. Joe Blow going to Disney for the first time probably isn’t going to notice the wear and tear on the monorail unless it’s pointed out to him.
That’s why it would be so much more impactful for things like this to go viral. Everyone in this thread is saying that the mold and dirt, etc. are gross. What happens if the public suddenly becomes aware of some of the nastier things that have gone under the radar… some of the shoddier repairs and the diminished quality that previously went unnoticed? What happens if it causes a public uproar that gets to the upper offices at Disney? What if those people then decide to go to Universal in droves? When the average uninformed Joe (their bread and butter target audience) is getting upset, suddenly it’s a BIG issue.
If it becomes big enough, it could do legitimate damage to their numbers and THAT is when change would start to happen. Right now, they’re being cheap and half-hearted with their attitudes towards maintenance and show quality because they can get away with it… what they’re doing is working for the bottom line right now… show quality (and future prospects) be damned. IF the decreased standards decrease revenue enough to hurt them vs. the saved expense, then you’ll see an uptick in quality. But that is a BIG, ugly sorcerer’s hat sized IF.