Another Uni. vs. Disney threads? Yes

IAmFloridaBorn

Well-Known Member
Most of you I assume don't live here in Orlando, so numbers will be different for you. But locals like myself don't stay at on-site hotels, so that is eliminated. We don't pay for parking so that is eliminated. Thing is, we don't have children either, so again certain aspects of a "Family Atmosphere" is eliminated. Universal is the best option for us and should we chose to stay at an onsite resort Universal would be our choice over a cheap Disney Motel. Just depends on what you wan't for your money!
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
Recent projects seem to be focused on getting more money out of the people who are already coming to the parks then trying to grow the attendance base.

Which is a problem in the long term because it assumes that attendence levels will be constant or maintained without substatial reinvestment.
 

WildcatDen

Well-Known Member
Just got back from 2 days at Universal. No doubt we had a good time but Good Gawd, thay have a bunch of motion simulators at US. They should be passing out samples of Dramamine at the front gate. . .
 

BryceM

Well-Known Member
Just got back from 2 days at Universal. No doubt we had a good time but Good Gawd, thay have a bunch of motion simulators at US. They should be passing out samples of Dramamine at the front gate. . .
There are only two motion simulators at Universal Studios... (Despicable Me and The Simpsons Ride)
 

Cliff Racer

Member
They might not be roller coasters but Shrek, Disaster, Twister and such aren't actual rides either. If you can't do thrill rides that knocks out Mummy and Rip Ride Rock-it so you're left with ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides. There'll be the Potter train when it opens, and the Simpsons spinners but if you're a fan of audio-anamatronics Universal Studios is a disappointing park. IoA is fine though.
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
They might not be roller coasters but Shrek, Disaster, Twister and such aren't actual rides either. If you can't do thrill rides that knocks out Mummy and Rip Ride Rock-it so you're left with ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides. There'll be the Potter train when it opens, and the Simpsons spinners but if you're a fan of audio-anamatronics Universal Studios is a disappointing park. IoA is fine though.

You will also have Transformers in a month or two.
 

JT3000

Well-Known Member
They might not be roller coasters but Shrek, Disaster, Twister and such aren't actual rides either. If you can't do thrill rides that knocks out Mummy and Rip Ride Rock-it so you're left with ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides. There'll be the Potter train when it opens, and the Simpsons spinners but if you're a fan of audio-anamatronics Universal Studios is a disappointing park. IoA is fine though.

I don't know how you came to the conclusion that E.T. and MIB are the only "actual rides" in the park besides Rockit and Mummy, but that's a rather bizarre statement. Disaster is also very much a ride. Also, an attraction doesn't require AA's to qualify as a ride. It need only be something you can... you know... ride.

Despicable Me
Rockit
Mummy
Disaster
MIB
Simpsons
E.T.
Woody Woodpecker

That's 8 rides, with 4 more on the way.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Yes, I know another Universal vs. Disney threads. But once again, Universal is on the rise. The upcoming Cabana Bay resort can bring a lot more guests to Universal, considering that a family four can spend only $49 per person per night and admission to both parks. I did a research price check at Disneyworld.com, and a stay in mid August with 2 adults and 2 children in a Value resort is $112, a $63 saving. This, in my opinion, will boost Universal's attendance significantly. How will Disney respond? This, we will have to wait and see.

Knock yourself out... with the same topic already here
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/comparing-disneys-hotels-to-unis-latest.860703/
 

BryceM

Well-Known Member
They might not be roller coasters but Shrek, Disaster, Twister and such aren't actual rides either. If you can't do thrill rides that knocks out Mummy and Rip Ride Rock-it so you're left with ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides. There'll be the Potter train when it opens, and the Simpsons spinners but if you're a fan of audio-anamatronics Universal Studios is a disappointing park. IoA is fine though.
"ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides."

"ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides."

"ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides."

"ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides."

WHAT.... o_O
 

Mike C

Well-Known Member
"ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides."

"ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides."

"ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides."

"ET and MiB as the only two rides that are actually rides."

WHAT.... o_O

A few people tend to blur the line between motion simulator and a ride that contains mostly projections and some physical sets.

Pure Rides at the studios: Rockit, Mummy, Disaster, Men In Black, ET, Woody Woodpecker (and all 4 new rides coming soon, Transformers, Kodos & Kang simpsons spinner, Gringotts and Hogwarts Express)
Motion Simulators: Despicable Me, Simpsons
3D Shows: Shrek, T2:3d (+ live actors)
Standard Shows/Walkthroughs: BeetleJuice, Animal Actors, Twister, Barney

Although I don't find it at all odd that a movie theme park has movies in it.
 

Cliff Racer

Member
You'll note that I specifically left out roller coasters like Mummy from that description. Simulators are not rides, they're fun but they don't actually go around on a track. So lets go through and count up what we've got.

Hollywood RIp-Ride Rockit- Coaster, its a ride but as I said I don't do thrill rides so its of little use to me
Shrek 4-D- Show
Twister- Show
Revenge of the Mummy- Coaster, its highly themed and not all that thrilling, I chickened out on it last time I went and regret that
Beetlejuice- Show
Disaster- Show with one little section on a track but thats far more of a moving platform that transports you to a scene than an actual ride. If they put wheels on the Twister theater, hauled you out to the room with the fake tornado and then brought you straight back you wouldn't call that a ride, would you?
Men In Black- Ride
The Simpsons Ride- Simulator, probably the best attraction in the park but you don't actually go anywhere.
Woody's Coaster- Coaster, I actually completely forgot about this but there it is. Maybe it was being rehabbed or something when I went or I just didn't go into the kids area its located in?
ET- An actual ride.
Horror Make-up Show- Show
Terminator- Show
Lucy- A Tribute- Walk-Thru
Despicable Me- Simulator Ride

They are building more stuff which is good and admittedly I visited during what will end up being a very small amount of time in the park's history when Jaws is gone but Harry is not yet there, Transformers is coming, the Simpsons is getting a spinner, etc.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
hence why people use the term 'attraction' - because is it really valuable to say something like Hall of Presidents is actually less valuable than Alladin's Flying Carpets? Simply because alladin has a ride vehicle you climb into?

Mummy is plenty thrilling - the coaster-only section just isn't that long. But I'm sure you put any person on there that isn't familar with it.. and put them in that burning room and see what they say.
 

JT3000

Well-Known Member
You'll note that I specifically left out roller coasters like Mummy from that description. Simulators are not rides, they're fun but they don't actually go around on a track. So lets go through and count up what we've got.

So you don't ride simulators? What do you do, magically levitate above the ride vehicle you're supposed to be riding in? That must be a neat trick.

Disaster- Show with one little section on a track but thats far more of a moving platform that transports you to a scene than an actual ride. If they put wheels on the Twister theater, hauled you out to the room with the fake tornado and then brought you straight back you wouldn't call that a ride, would you?

So a ride is no longer something that goes around on a track, like Disaster does? Did the definition change again in the last few minutes? You're also completely ignoring the ride's motion base. It's not a "moving platform" at all.
 

Cliff Racer

Member
Disaster does not go around on a track, it goes forward, you watch an effects scene from Earthquake and then the ride goes backward to the start.

At least I think it did, it doesn't actually go in a loop, does it?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom