Actually, they don't call as much attention to Jack as you may think. Only 3 pirates do that (Barbossa, the well captain and the "pooped" pirate).
He's either referred to or appears in four of the eight scenes (Disney World's version). I'd say that's a pretty high percentage - 50 if my math isn't off. Forgive me, I prefer the original scripts.
JDR said:
Why should the attraction NEED to conform itself to a currently popular movie? You mean, like Voyage of the Little Mermaid? Finding Nemo the Musical or the ride? Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor? Stitch's Great Escape? Festival of the Lion King? Not to mention the Great Movie Ride...
Only one of these you mentioned has any relevance to my point - Stitch's Great Escape. I'll give you one more on this, though - Under New Management. In those two cases, they took existing attractions and reworked them using popular characters. The others were original concepts.I would say they did a great injustice to the Tiki Room by doing it, though I would conversely argue they vastly improved Alien Encounter by turning it into Stitch's Great Escape.
JDR said:
Look, I'm usually all for improvements to attractions No offense, but it doesn't sound that way.
I gave specific reasons why I didn't like these so-called improvements. Others, such as Stitch (as mentioned above), I welcome. As I also mentioned, if it involving changing the story or scenario, then I'm probably not going to be a big fan of it.
JDR said:
The original story was really less of a story and more of a general scenario. If it wasn't much of a storyline to begin with, then how could the story be compromised by adding a specific story?
Seriously, I explained this already. Am I crazy in thinking you're arguing just for the sake of arguing? Okay, you take a general story/scenario and add a specific new thing to it, which ultimately alters the end of the story. Is this not compromising the original idea? Have you not changed it?
JDR said:
It's like the bride scene at Disneyland's Haunted Mansion. Until I read these boards, I wasn't even AWARE that Haunted Mansion had a Bride storyline.
Exactly my point. She's been there all along, but it's pretty much left up to your imagination what happened and how she got there. Now, Disneyland's "enhancements" show pictures of her with her husbands, and as you pass the men's heads disappear. Also, she is now a video projection that wields an axe instead of a candle, saying stuff like, "I do...I DID!" They're telling you why she's there, and to me it ruins the fun of imagining what might have happened.
To show you again I do like many of their improvements, Disneyland's HM has made it so Madame Leota's crystal ball now floats around the room. This is an amazing effect, and since it doesn't change the story (or lack thereof), it's the kind of improvement I'd love to see more of.
JDR said:
...if that's why they did it, they were bowing down to a fad...a fad that may fade in the next ten years. Like 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? (Although I still loved that one!)
Huh? I haven't a clue how this relates.
I don't think I'll ever come to accept the new version, just as I never embraced the PC version. I'll still ride it, of course, but my deepest hope is that it will someday go back to the original form, and that if they added scenes they would just be audio animatronic improvements like the dueling pirates at Disneyland Paris. Imagination is a wonderful thing...if we're allowed to use it.
Sorry for holding this thread hostage for so long. I'll try to refrain from responding to future attacks.
edit: "Attacks" was the wrong word to use. "Disagreements" would be more appropirate.