• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

EPCOT Announced: Mary Poppins Attraction in UK Pavilion

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Whilst it would be nice if every pavilion had a ride there's two major things that prevent that ever being possible.

The first one is obviously money. The second is space - Japan and Italy for example have a fair bit of service infrastructure around them, which would need to be relocated, which comes back to costs.

Personally I'd rather they add extra countries into some of the gaps that were left for them between Germany & Italy & China. That comes back to money again though.
Japan was actually built with an attraction building. It was to house something that was to work like a reverse carousel of progress with guest sitting in the middle and rotating to views around them.

My understanding is it's currently some form of storage.
 
Last edited:

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Why are you opposed to another spinner ride but not another carousel?
He's not talking a real regular carousel but if they'd gone with a real carousel, it wouldn't have even needed to have been hidden.

It would have actually fit the theme if placed back inside the pavilion a bit and been more accessible than a teacups style ride and also worked directly as a part of the environment.
 
Last edited:

JohnD

Well-Known Member
And fits the story better I mean theres a freaking carousel as part of the story...

although i think it would be amazing to start as a carousel and then the horses with poles unlock and take you through a dark ride kind of like the movie.
View attachment 705438
I had a post about that a year or more ago. I would prefer a dark ride but if there isn't much space it doesn't even have to be in a carousel. As another commented, you could be single file with projection mapping on either side of you. You go up and down with the images moving past.
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
They didn't use the D23 stage to announce *this*.

They announced some sort of Poppins attractions along with all the other EPCOT renewal initiatives at the same time as one big package.

At the time of D23 they didn't even say what the attraction was.

Announcing a “Poppins attraction”, and then designing this is the issue. If they had gone through with this after the vague announcement…

I agree the parks need more small attractions, but Disney also has to be careful by how they announce and approach.
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
I agree. Another spinning ride no parent wants to ride vs. a carousel ride with hydraulics under each horse, pushing it up and down. The top of the horse pole isn't attached to the ceiling so its like one of the horses in the movie. Children and adults wouldn't mind that ride as much.

View attachment 705434

I imagine this, trackless, in an indoor (looks outdoor) setting. Luigi’s Rollickin’ Roadster style, dancing around to Jolly Holiday.

Can still keep it as a “flat” ride, but more creative then a teacup ride…
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Well, big surprise, Chapek was going to cheap-*ss the Mary Poppins "attraction". That just demonstrates yet again the contempt the suits at "Disney" have for Walt's crown jewel and for the park guest. This is the kind of "just-put-a-strobe-light-on-the-broken-yeti" mentality that has earned "Disney" its once-devoted Disney fans' rightful scorn.

As I've mentioned, the original Mary Poppins film deserves an entire LAND. So much potential to be authentic Disney and truly magical, immersive and enjoyable. But hah! Be happy with yet another spinner, you peasants. Pathetic.
 

esskay

Well-Known Member
Japan was actually built with an attraction building. It house something that was to work like a reverse carousel of progress with guest sitting in the middle and rotating to views around them.

My understanding is it's currently some form of storage.
I imagine after all this time its valuable storage space that would need relocating to a new building somewhere else so doubt its likely to ever see any use sadly.
 

Grace61

New Member
An updated Peter Pan type ride, through Cherry tree lane (Mary's )arrival, Uncle Albert's ceiling, then the animated park scene (Outings with Mary), then finishing up among the kites ,(Let's go fly a kite).

Could also update those scence to fit the sequel. Just do balloons and nowhere to go but up and the upside down scene.

Short on space, make it a 2 story building.

More expensive than a spinner? Sure. But would be dun for everyone.
 

ppete1975

Well-Known Member
I had a post about that a year or more ago. I would prefer a dark ride but if there isn't much space it doesn't even have to be in a carousel. As another commented, you could be single file with projection mapping on either side of you. You go up and down with the images moving past.
Yeah I had that exact idea years ago on here (probably others have as well) a dark internal carousel with a rotating exterior with scenes or screens.
 

𝐌𝖆𝖓 𝖎𝖓 𝐖𝖊𝖇

Long-Forgotten
Premium Member
Honestly this concept looks amazing and Epcot could really use another C ticket family ride.

Everything up to the ride type was great Imagineering. The concept fell apart when the elaborate queue and setup led to teacups. For what it's worth, I'm not really knocking the teacup attraction itself (even though Tea Party personally induces serious nausea) I just think it's the wrong ride type for the concept. Had they gone with a different spinner type I'd be all the more forgiving. Take for instance the classic Musik Express/Himalayas carnival attraction. That ride type could simulate the movement of a slow galloping Carousel and a frenetic spinning, dizzying saucer ride. Combining that with the same projection tech that was to be used here, and you could have the best of both rides and a premise that could explore both the classic Poppins go round and the tea cup spinning storylines. It would have been the better ride type, IMO. Another option could have used a Vekoma's Mad House to recreate Topsy-Turvey's upside down room or a sequence similar to Poppin's visit with Uncle Albert.

Practically ANYTHING would have be better than a rehash of Tea Cups. The IP is most deserving of a dark ride. Anything else is always going to be less than.
 
Last edited:

jeanericuser001

Well-Known Member
Now that this is gone, we can focus on another British property that currently doesn't have any theme park presence that Disney is now throwing money at:

View attachment 705441
A MIB style attraction with cybermen and dalec invasion would make for an awesome attraction. Too bad disney would never jump at it. Universal would if they could but no one seems to be ready to put down a serious interest in it.
 

Jambo Dad

Well-Known Member
Not my choice for that pavilion, but I could live with it if it was part of a larger strategy over the next decade to get world showcase where it needs to be:
1. Add Brazil
2. Get Alps ride in Germany
3. Get bullet train in Japan.
4. Re theme Mexico to Coco
4. Have plan to do something in Morocco, Canada, and Italy queued up for the next decade after that.
 

BubbaisSleep

Well-Known Member
I agree with everyone’s opinions on this ride. I will say this concept kind of fit my vision of what they would do if they went cheap. There’s a spinner at Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk that’s indoors and utilizes music & lasers as the ride starts. I’d imagine Marry Poppins would be the same but with projection mapping.

While cool, this should have been a complementary ride to a bigger attraction. I also thought it would be a Merry Go Round but I guess teacups have no obstructions when viewing the walls.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom