News Announced: Mary Poppins Attraction in UK Pavilion

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Put on hold.

Irony is that it was supposed to be an Avenger (Capt. America) coaster, but Ops sent it back to the drawing board for not having a high enough capacity. That sent the delayed replacement to coincide with COVID.

So, in it's place, we now have a capacity of zero.
That means the current plan is “under budget”. 👍🏻

Josh and Bob like that.

So avengers land is a stripped down Spider-Man version of midway mania and a street show where they toss a mechanical dummy into a net?
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
I don't care if the Jolly Holiday Attraction will never became a reality. I just want to hang out with the Singing Farm Animals dang it!
JollyHolidaysFarmAnimals.PNG


Especially the sheep and lambs!
MaryPoppinsFarmAnimals1.PNG

MaryPoppinsLambs.PNG
 

Attachments

  • JollyHoliday.PNG
    JollyHoliday.PNG
    557.2 KB · Views: 87

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
I don't care if the Jolly Holiday Attraction will never became a reality. I just want to hang out with the Singing Farm Animals dang it!
View attachment 626484

Especially the sheep and lambs!
View attachment 626486
View attachment 626488
This is Chapek. If we get anything, it will be MPR. I actually really enjoyed it and Emily Blunt is fabulous (and perhaps closer to the book version) but Julie is incomparable and far too iconic in the role. It was an impossible task.

On the other hand, I adore LMM but he just isn’t the best vocalist. I wish he’d stay on the creative side.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
This is Chapek. If we get anything, it will be MPR. I actually really enjoyed it and Emily Blunt is fabulous (and perhaps closer to the book version) but Julie is incomparable and far too iconic in the role. It was an impossible task.

On the other hand, I adore LMM but he just isn’t the best vocalist. I wish he’d stay on the creative side.
I thought it was well made.

Mary poppins is my favorite Disney movie ever…and it’s not that close. I honestly don’t know how it’s not everyone’s???

…but anyway, the problem with returns is it was a straight up remake…or the “Disney brand” remake…

Where they “change” everything…so fans can scream ORIGINAL!!!…but if you split screen it, it’s a total doppelgänger.

Like step in time and the lamppost scene.

At some point, you have to question if they’re that cynical or think everyone is that stupid?
 
Last edited:

TikibirdLand

Well-Known Member
I thought it was well made.

Mary poppins is my favorite Disney movie ever…and it’s not that close. I honestly don’t know how it’s not everyone’s???

…but anyway, the problem with returns is it was a straight up remake…or the “Disney brand” remake…

Where they “change” everything…so fans can scream ORIGINAL!!!…but if you split screen it, it’s a total doppelgänger.

Like step in time and the lamppost scene.

At some point, you have to question if they’re that cynical or think everyone is that stupid?
Well, I must be THAT stupid. I LOVE the first one. And, I love the second one. Maybe it is because they're so close. Each has special scenes that are or will become iconic. And, I thought LMM was good in his part. His singing was supposed to be a bit "off" when compared to Blunt's. Seemed a good pairing to this bird.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
Well, I must be THAT stupid. I LOVE the first one. And, I love the second one. Maybe it is because they're so close. Each has special scenes that are or will become iconic. And, I thought LMM was good in his part. His singing was supposed to be a bit "off" when compared to Blunt's. Seemed a good pairing to this bird.
I would agree...The MPR was tonally a perfect fit to the tone and style of the original film, and everyone was very good in it... It is just a shame that there was a first version to compare it to...It was a lovely charming film...and how nice that it wasn't a cartoon or a superhero movie for once...
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It was indeed highly derivative of the first film but I suspect many would’ve been angry if it wasn’t so clearly a Mary Poppins movie. It was a hard task after so many decades, but I appreciate it nonetheless.
…or

“It’s been so long, let’s be super conservative and do the same thing! Kids don’t have the internet, so they’ll never realize!”

…there are other…many…other examples
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Well, I must be THAT stupid. I LOVE the first one. And, I love the second one. Maybe it is because they're so close. Each has special scenes that are or will become iconic. And, I thought LMM was good in his part. His singing was supposed to be a bit "off" when compared to Blunt's. Seemed a good pairing to this bird.

I would agree...The MPR was tonally a perfect fit to the tone and style of the original film, and everyone was very good in it... It is just a shame that there was a first version to compare it to...It was a lovely charming film...and how nice that it wasn't a cartoon or a superhero movie for once...
You both are agreeing with me…and that’s the problem (always 🤪)

The problem was it was shot as a 1964 film…in high def - which makes it look old hat.

I love that Disney made movies like saving mr banks, Christopher Robin and MPR…but Iger the accountant wouldn’t approve them unless they hedged by being overly reverent…


I mean…the final kite song became a final balloon song…sung by Miss Price/Mrs Potts when Julie Andrews said no
 
Last edited:

ImperfectPixie

Well-Known Member
You both are agreeing with me…and that’s the problem (always 🤪)

The problem was it was shot as a 1964 film…in high def - which makes it look old hat.

I love that Disney made movies like saving mr banks, Christopher Robin and MPR…but Iger the accountant wouldn’t approve them unless they hedged by being overly reverent…


I mean…the final kite song became a final balloon song…sung by Miss Price/Mrs Potts when Julie Andrews said no
Saving Mr. Banks 😭 Every. Single. Time.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom