Professortango1
Well-Known Member
Kong was the biggest disappointment at IOA for us. And that was even with a Fat Pass from Forbidden Journey. Great queue, amazing facade....veeeery bland attraction.True but fast and furious is bad for more reasons than it uses nothing but screens. also I actually like the King Kong ride.
If they rebuilt the Kong experience from the ground-up, sure. But they can't just plop an AA at the start or ending, unless they are building a whole new show scene. The Kong AA in Orlando is impressive, but makes the experience even more lackluster as he isn't doing anything. He's just hanging out like he's on break. I'd hate to see Hollywood have the same ending.Sure but just from a legacy standpoint, USH needs a Kong AA and having one is better than not having one. My point is, of the two, kong would benefit more from being a practical focused attraction than Back 2 the Future and that Back 2 the future in general isn’t the first IP in their arsenal that I’d choose if I was going to focus on more of a practical attraction.
A Back to the Future segment could have a Delorian on a Kuka Arm, real sparks, real fire, an AA dinosaur if they wanted to go that route. Ghostbusters could have some physical ghosts, a practical Ecto-1 "drive in" and blast at the ghosts. Either way, I'm here for a physical experience to match what we lost with Kong and the tunnel of rethemes.