It's better for a park to be just plain closed during a day of rain instead of opening like Disneyland does, make guests pay full price, close most of the rides and then kick them out a couple of hours later. They are only open to sell crap.
I hear you, but as someone who was at Disneyland over the weekend, any kind of guest consideration would be appreciated. I anticipated weather related issues at the park, but not the level of unpreparedness we found. Naturally, outdoor rides would close, but indoor ones would shut down unexpectedly as well. There were a handful of cast members trying to rise to the occasion, but so many of them seemed to be huddled under overhangs alongside paying guests. The cherry was closing the park early, which I do understand but it felt like adding insult to injury for those of us who were trying to tough it out. The prospect of the park seeming any kind of apologetic for the circumstances crossed my mind, but as far fetched and humorous.
I'm sure they didn't do a 100% perfect job with handling the weather/day, but it's far from unheard of for Amusement/Theme Parks to close early because of extreme or unusual weather situations. Usually the people who do come that day are able to enjoy quiet parks with short lines; if that didn't happen at Disneyland, it's probably because the higher proportion of indoor rides meant that people stuck around than would have if they were at a park like Magic Mountain, where there's truly almost nothing to do if things have to shut down for storms. Given the unique circumstances of the last weekend, I can't entirely blame the park for closing early, so long as this remains the exception and not the rule when adverse weather happens.
For me, a park just up and closing because of weather (Knott's) is less commendable than a park that tried to stay open and offer something for people who wanted to go.
No park in the universe is going to lower their ticket prices because of weather. And they aren't generally going to straight-up close for weather unless it's going to be the apocalypse outside (generally in the Midwest, this would generally be blizzards or intense snow). Although it wasn't
just an ordinary rain storm, I've never seen a park just decide not to open because of rain, other than Knott's this last weekend. Maybe if there was flooding and the park was damaged after the fact, necessitating repair work and so on, sure, but it's not something they would generally do pre-emptively.
We know that reliability has been a mess since reopening regardless of weather conditions, so I would not blame any ride downtime issues for indoor attrations on the weather.
DLR could probably do more to deal with rain/weather, but that could be extended to SoCal as a whole. There's nothing I'm aware of that points to DLR being uniquely bad at dealing with outdoor weather within the area. If anything, they have a decided advantage over places like SFMM or Knott's by sheer virtue of having many more indoor attractions. And they opened, something that at least one competitor chose not to do.
Cast Members huddling under cover...I'm not sure what they were expected to do here. I can't say I blame them for looking for cover unless they were explicitly needed in the moment to be out dealing with the weather conditions or byproducts that happened as a result.
In other parts of the country, where severe weather is a more frequent occurance, people either choose to not go on days where severe weather is supposed to happen, or they know going in that it's not going to be a perfect day, but decide to make the best of it all the same. No one in that situation goes and then is mad that the weather that was advertised did indeed occur, and park operation was affected-they anticipate it and if by lucky chance it doesn't happen, then hey, it's an added bonus.
While I wasn't there on the ground, I do not get the impression that Disneyland did anything uniquely wrong or unfair in this situation given the exceptional circumstances that occured.