-
The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More -
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
AK Dragon on Logo Explained
- Thread starter djronnieb
- Start date
chancellor
Member
I believe there is still a substantial amount of cleared land behind Camp Minnie-Mickey that could easily house an e-ticket ride. FotLK would not have to be relocated, though I admit there would be some transitional problems with the "woodsy" area going into something mythical (not that FotLK fits in Camp Minnie-Mickey in the first place).
As for Dinosaur and Indy, it was my understanding that Dinosaur uses the same track layout and the same vehicle technology as Indy (meaning the Indiana Jones Adventure in DL), but with completely different themeing for a different experience. They are much more simlar than the Barnstormer and a huge 80 MPH roller coaster. My point was that the same could be done with JTTCOE re-themed to a dragon-based ride.
As for Dinosaur and Indy, it was my understanding that Dinosaur uses the same track layout and the same vehicle technology as Indy (meaning the Indiana Jones Adventure in DL), but with completely different themeing for a different experience. They are much more simlar than the Barnstormer and a huge 80 MPH roller coaster. My point was that the same could be done with JTTCOE re-themed to a dragon-based ride.
OliveMcFly
Well-Known Member
What would the Beastly Kingdom be like?
DarkMeasures
New Member
askmike1 said:
Actually, no.
First of all, the land set aside for Beastly Kingdomme is between Camp Minnie Mickey and Africa. There might not seem to much room but that is the area set aside for that area. And any backstage building in the way could easily be moved because they are almost all trailers. Not only that, but Camp Minnie Mickey was ment to be demolished to make room for future lands. And even with FOTLK being where it is, the original attraction was built on the super cheap and it wouldn't hurt at all financially for the attraction to move to another land.
And second, Dinosaur is a rethemed Indy. Not only is it the same ride system but it has the exact same layout and certain events also are based on the same mechanics. (The final scenes on both are awfully similar). Now to actually make the comparison like you made, that would be more or less comparing Dinosaur to Test Track which also both happen to feature the same ride system.
I should also state that the concept for Dragon's Tower and Everest are completly different and the aspect of Beastly Kingdomme can still exist in the park. I am the concepts for the attractions in this land are nothing like Everest in any way except the mythical animal. For example, Dragon's Tower. The Bats for some reason (never explained) want you to help steal a dragon's gem and that is what the whole story is centered upon. The ride vehicle itself is not a Dragon but bats holding seats. So the ride could even coexist with Dueling Dragons.
In all, there is absolutly no reason why Beastly Kingdomme can't be built or even one or two of its attractions. (honestly, I only like Dragon's Tower and I dislike every other thing). And with Strategic Planning being dimished, it will be much harder for someone against the project to be able to cancel it which in turn will give the area a much higher chance of being built. I say that there is a closer chance for Beastly Kingdomme to be built than when the area was originally cut from the first phase.
speck76
Well-Known Member
DarkMeasures said:
I do not think this is correct....
If that is the case, what was the problem with the building of Test Track that delayed the attraction for 2 years....since the technology in Dinosaur had been around for a number of years prior (Since Indy opened at DL)
Also....I was under the impression that the ride system for TT was created by Intamin, whereas Indy/Dinosaur was WDI.
RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
This is the first I'd heard of Dragon's Tower, my assumption is that it's an old idea thrown around during the original concepts of Beastly Kingdom.
I know AK has stated a desire to have mythical creatures in the park and are making their first step with EE, but how bout another animal walk through or ride? I know many people are worried about the AK being a half day park, but the real animals are what make it "The Animal Kingdom"
I know AK has stated a desire to have mythical creatures in the park and are making their first step with EE, but how bout another animal walk through or ride? I know many people are worried about the AK being a half day park, but the real animals are what make it "The Animal Kingdom"
DarkMeasures
New Member
speck76 said:
Nope. WDI developed Test Track and it is an EMV.
The problem with the delays comes from this fact. Dinosaur goes maybe at a top speed of 10 mph, probably slower. Test Track on the otherhand was designed up to 100 mph (even if it only goes 65), and was designed to be able to stop at any moment on the track instantly and safely. But the ride system was developed totally in house by WDI.
gboiler1
Active Member
RSoxNo1 said:
Mouseplanet featured a 2 part series in December on Beastlie Kingdomme, but mainly Dragon Tower. It's a great read and you'll see why it's an exciting prospect.
Here's the link to part 2, which includes a link to part 1. Enjoy!
http://www.mouseplanet.com/mark/mg041027.htm
CaptainMichael
Well-Known Member
speck76 said:
I concur. Animal Kingdom needs a lot more. I believe mythological animals do belong, but we need a good balance of everything. I'd still like to see Dragon Tower. I'd also like to see more animal based attractions.
speck76
Well-Known Member
When EE opens, I think the crowds to DAK are going to increase by quite a bit. This being the case, I would think DAK will end up reaching capacity on MANY days.....simply because there is not a great deal of space for people to be in the park.
This last Sunday, I got there are about 3pm......the parking lot was only 2/3 full, but the park was packed......to a level where it was not comfortable. It was hard to walk the paths, due to the large number of guests. KS, Dinosaur, and Kali all had significant waits (45+ minutes).
When EE opens, more people will come to the park. Let's say EE raises the attendance by 7%. That would add an additional 1800 people into the park EVERY day. Now, even though EE will be able to hold this many people in its queue....ALL of DAK's main attractions will have Fastpass....so many of these people will be walking around the park, and not waiting in the queue.
My feeling is that DAK needs to add 2 or 3 more animal treks (like Pangani Forest or Maharaja Jungle) as this will give the park more "floor space" to hold bodies.
Also, perhaps some new exhibit needs to open near Rafiki's Planet Watch, which will keep people out in this area for a longer period of time.
This last Sunday, I got there are about 3pm......the parking lot was only 2/3 full, but the park was packed......to a level where it was not comfortable. It was hard to walk the paths, due to the large number of guests. KS, Dinosaur, and Kali all had significant waits (45+ minutes).
When EE opens, more people will come to the park. Let's say EE raises the attendance by 7%. That would add an additional 1800 people into the park EVERY day. Now, even though EE will be able to hold this many people in its queue....ALL of DAK's main attractions will have Fastpass....so many of these people will be walking around the park, and not waiting in the queue.
My feeling is that DAK needs to add 2 or 3 more animal treks (like Pangani Forest or Maharaja Jungle) as this will give the park more "floor space" to hold bodies.
Also, perhaps some new exhibit needs to open near Rafiki's Planet Watch, which will keep people out in this area for a longer period of time.