Epcot82Guy
Well-Known Member
I have a feeling that the eventually the response is going to be "I'm okay with change as long as the 'spirit' of EPCOT Center is there"...
I understand your issue with the "spirit" argument, but it reallyh is true. The thing is that I firmly believe there was a way to make Epcot relevant and interesting without the characters (although, admittedly, still adult). TT, M:S, and Soarin' all work. I gravely miss the attractions they replaced (and I still think Horizons could have been maintained - but another issue). However, I do not feel the attachment. Instead, it frustrates me to see some attractions first get neglected and then accused of being dated and irrelevant in concept. I am all for Epcot progressing; not for it changing (and pvt me if you would like me to explain the difference in my head).
And to answer the previous post, the best year for Epcot for me would be 2006 IF the approach that brought us I:ROE, Soarin', TT, and the SSE revamp (adding in Tomorrow's Child) had been used to update the entire park.