A Spirited Perfect Ten

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
I respect people's opinions on foreign travel, but if you're the kind of Disney fan who goes to WDW once a year or more out of habbit, then it's actually a better use of your time and money to combine a short Disney "stop-over" with another locale. You'll still get your Disney fix, but see more of the world in the process.
 

LieutLaww

Hello There
Premium Member
In the Parks
No
DLP is insanely expensive to visit, I live in the UK 2 hrs away at most, priced up 7 days to DLP £2100 !!! that is £700 less than i am paying for my Trip this year to Disney in Florida all in for 2 weeks. I would like to see DLP but not at those prices, oh and that was before park tickets too.
 

cdd89

Well-Known Member
What's the difference between forgoing the great cultural experiences and natural wonders we have in America for another WDW trip, and doing the same in a foreign country?

I think people feel a greater sense of urgency since trips to foreign locales have a rarer quality about them, but the truth is that most people will never see all the amazing things there are in the US.
That's a great point, and it works well the other way too: Europe isn't exactly short of things to do and destinations to see, but that doesn't stop me from taking "yet another" weekend trip to DLP.

I think part of the problem is that a lot of people travel with the philosophy that they "may never be back". On the face of it that's reasonable... But the result is that you end up running around like a mad person, and sacrificing activities you'd find enjoyable in-the-moment for activities lauded as worthy or culturally significant.

I've always thought it's interesting that "seeing local culture" is one of the most frequently cited reasons for international travel, followed by visiting "local tourist attraction" after "local tourist attraction". Most of the time, you can either see local culture, *or* great tourist attractions, but not both. International Disney Parks, that attract locals, are a rare opportunity to do both simultaneously.

Plus, I love coming across Americans in DLP - I always end up talking to them; it's like the trademark signature of a Disney Parks nerd. ;-)
 
Last edited:

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
DLP is insanely expensive to visit, I live in the UK 2 hrs away at most, priced up 7 days to DLP £2100 !!! that is £700 less than i am paying for my Trip this year to Disney in Florida all in for 2 weeks. I would like to see DLP but not at those prices, oh and that was before park tickets too.
Why would you go for 7 days? That makes no sense as its 1.5 parks. You also don't have to stay on site as the train station makes it easy to get to from many more places.
 

Nemo14

Well-Known Member
What's the difference between forgoing the great cultural experiences and natural wonders we have in America for another WDW trip, and doing the same in a foreign country?

I think people feel a greater sense of urgency since trips to foreign locales have a rarer quality about them, but the truth is that most people will never see all the amazing things there are in the US.

I have to agree with you there Tom. I will never understand people right here in America who spend every vacation handing their hard-earned money over to the Mouse when there is so much to see outside of the bubble in our own country. The state parks, and particularly our national parks are such a treasure, yet so many people choose repeat visits to Orlando rather than discover what our country has to offer!
 

bhg469

Well-Known Member
I think that's 3 now, in a year an a half or so. So that's a little exaggerated.

BUT... What is inexcusable is them not having a full proof backup plan when it does go down. How that slipped through the cracks is crazy.
I can see a backup easily work for most of the systems on their own, especially at the entry turnstiles but making all the separate systems talk during an outage or interruption is probably a nightmare.
 

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
I think that's 3 now, in a year an a half or so. So that's a little exaggerated.

BUT... What is inexcusable is them not having a full proof backup plan when it does go down. How that slipped through the cracks is crazy.

Not really - We hear about it when it goes down for an extended period, When I was there last August MM+ was not working for AP's only for the entire weekend and it was down intermittently for everyone the entire weekend we were there.

Because this was a 'Boardroom' IT project 'non-essentials' like backup systems were probably eliminated because a proper backup system for a enterprise system like this requires a alternate data center with a full set of hardware located preferably 100 or more miles away on a separate power grid so a local event like a tornado or flood does not affect both data centers also you need full path redundancy for your data links so the the east and west paths are never running in the same conduit.

Plus you need a synchronization mechanism to keep the the data in sync, Something like Panzura or a NetApp GeoCluster both give you a 'private' cloud.
 
Last edited:

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
I can see a backup easily work for most of the systems on their own, especially at the entry turnstiles but making all the separate systems talk during an outage or interruption is probably a nightmare.

Trouble is that's EXACTLY what a true ENTERPRISE IT system is supposed to do, It's complex and expensive yet it is indeed a routine thing for most large companies, The fact that DIsney is unable or unwilling speaks volumes about it's corporate culture
 

Nubs70

Well-Known Member
Not really - We hear about it when it goes down for an extended period, When I was there last August MM+ was not working for AP's only for the entire weekend and it was down intermittently for everyone the entire weekend we were there.

Because this was a 'Boardroom' IT project 'non-essentials' like backup systems were probably eliminated because a proper backup system for a enterprise system like this requires a alternate data center with a full set of hardware located preferably 100 or more miles away on a separate power grid so a local event like a tornado or flood does not affect both data centers also you need full path redundancy for your data links so the the east and west paths are never running in the same conduit.

Plus you need a synchronization mechanism to keep the the data in sync, Something like Panzura or a NetApp GeoCluster both give you a 'private' cloud.
Didn't MM+ go live the same week as a large data center did out west?
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
DLP is insanely expensive to visit, I live in the UK 2 hrs away at most, priced up 7 days to DLP £2100 !!! that is £700 less than i am paying for my Trip this year to Disney in Florida all in for 2 weeks. I would like to see DLP but not at those prices, oh and that was before park tickets too.
£1800 for 8 days two adults including tickets and breakfast staying on site. Without one of the regular offers of more for less.

But you wouldn't need 8 days.
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
I'm with you guys as well. I've been to Paris a number of times and never even considered visiting DLP. Only been to Tokyo once, but it didn't cross my mind there either. And it still wouldn't now. When I'm travelling internationally, I am interested in seeing the great cultural stuff that the location has to offer. I'm sure DLP is pretty, but there's literally dozens -- if not hundreds -- of things I would rather see in Europe before spending a day at DLP.
Well, that's all very elitist, but whatever floats your boat. I'm heading for Europe in October. I am going to be in Paris for 4 days and one of those days I will be at DLP. The reason is simple, I am a Disney fan. I have spent a great deal of time discussing, reading about and researching Disney related things. I don't consider myself obsessed, just a Disney hobbyist. I have been to Paris before... I have seen the Louvre, I've been to the top of the Eiffel Tower, I been to Notre Dame, the west and the east bank sides of the river, I have dined in sidewalk cafe's (including one time when I found a chicken bone in the bottom of my wine bottle), I have walked the Champs Élysées. What I have not done is go to DLP which is just as much a part of the culture now as those dusty old buildings.

The one day that I am going to spend in DLP will not deprive me of the history and culture surrounding it. I will be spending almost a month in Europe so I will have absorbed plenty of culture during that time. I also went to Tokyo and didn't see TDL, course, it didn't exist at the time so that made it quite difficult to see.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
I look forward to seeing it restored and improved if so- it's so easy to get there it would be great to hop over again and enjoy it like I used to. I was really put off 4 years ago.
There is an absolutely HUGE multi year improvement program currently going ahead. Hopefully their finances will be sorted out now for good. The place simply cost too much to build in 1990-92 and has been paying for it ever since.

As an example, the hotel refurb program is ELEVEN years long. One resort at a time is being virtually rebuilt and refurnished. It ends in 2021. Sequoia is done. Newport is halfway though. Then it's New York and then Disneyland. One value is done and Davey is mostly done too.

In the parks, again as an example, Space Mountain is down for six months this year, six next year. Thunder Mountain is closed for 11 months next year. By April 2017 the plan is to have the parks like new.

I've seen atrocious conditions at DLP, in attractions, the village and the resorts. And I've seen huge improvements over the years and am confident things will continue in the same direction.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom