Nubs70
Well-Known Member
Seems he follows the management philosophy of servant leadership. An interesting concept.Saw that. Don't know anything about him ... what's the word?
Seems he follows the management philosophy of servant leadership. An interesting concept.Saw that. Don't know anything about him ... what's the word?
Probably because it's irrelivant everywhere else.
C'mon, you really think you (or anyone) can make an intelligent and reasoned explanation for why no pics have been released?
I dunno, they were building the steel pretty fast.
Looking at the latest progress with Harry Potter land at Universal Studios Hollywood, you can tell who is clearly committed to building attractions while WDW is dragging their feet on a new attraction "couch cough" Avatar Land. And they said that the land is a year away from being done, I think they can get it done by the holidays.
Just a little thought and speculation about the Shanghai resort. Disney should have a banner year this year with two of the biggest movies in Hollywood opening this year. Resorts will continue to increase across the board and TV will still have the huge bloated margins.
2016 though, with no Frozen, Avengers or Star Wars, ever think moving the Shanghai resort back to 2016 could have been a strategic move designed to bloat the P&R numbers as a way to impress quarterly reports? If you couple Shanghai with Frozen at Epcot and whatever else upcoming elsewhere, you could have a spectacular year from a number crunching perspective.
maybe thats a better way for Shendy?And again, that surely seems to be a key difference between The Weatherman and the guy he replaced.
Plaques are well and good. And China has a huge (in numbers, not percentage of people) middle class. But it is also a vast nation. The Disney Channel and films are how you introduce your BRAND to people and get them to understand, appreciate and, hopefully, love it. Assuming SDL attracts 12 million next year (my prediction right now and you can be sure those numbers will be played with beyond all belief), how much of China is learning what Disney is? Not what a Disney theme park is so much as what everything from Mickey Mouse to Cinderella to Buzz Lightyear to Olaf is ...
No, it's not the right way to enter China. But Bob had to show up Michael, so he closed on a bad deal.
Again, I know this is part of the "larger issue", but I feel like the bigger picture is being missed by focusing on... literally just a maybe missing picture.
Why not focus on the missing 800 million dollars instead?
If there is no picture of Iger in front of a completed SDL, then sure, I'll raise my brow. But he'll be there plastered on the media circuit, just like always.
maybe thats a better way for Shendy?
Aka build Shangai Disneyland, with little disney penetration.. see how the park behaves in 12 mil crowds.. start bombardment of Disney channel.. expand parks when the onslaught behinds.
having 1,000 millions of people interested in Disney makes you wonder about overrun.
Why is this always the cop out answer when someone disagrees?
Yes, instead of exercising their right to express an opinion, just silence and/or dismiss them from the thread instead.
The NFL, NCAA, political parties, country clubs, religions, and any number of other institutions have been doing it for who knows how long. Brand advocates are brand advocates. Even the Spirited threads have brand advocates. I don't think its a good thing or a bad thing. It's a thing. Discussing it, ok. Passing judgement, I will leave that to those who give a carp.While focusing on the every move of any/all Lifestylers make would be an awful waste of life, looking at how and why Disney treats these people as special (many are in other ways) and uses them as de facto BRAND advocates who basically disclose their free stuff by saying things like ''We were provided everything for free by Disney, even though you'd have to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars, but that has nothing to do with the fact we found everything to be MAGICal and would gladly spend our own money.'' IS a topic worth discussing.
I believe there is 10-plus page thread on this very subject on WDW General and, no, I haven't posted a thing in it!
SIAP, but an interesting article on how other studios should basically give up trying to compete with Disney in the blockbuster/tentpole arena, since Disney can pretty easily drop two "sure things" per quarter between Star Wars, Marvel, Pixar, Disney Animation, and the now viable Live Action Remake.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottme...-disney-but-they-can-win-if-they-stop-trying/
Random tidbit: I just came back from a long weekend in WDW and I rode the MAGICal Express back to MCO (it's actually convenient and - best of all - free). During the ride Jennifer Fickley-Baker popped up on the TV screens and all I could think of was, "Dr. Blondie!!" as I laughed for a good few seconds.
The NFL, NCAA, political parties, country clubs, religions, and any number of other institutions have been doing it for who knows how long. Brand advocates are brand advocates. Even the Spirited threads have brand advocates. I don't think its a good thing or a bad thing. It's a thing. Discussing it, ok. Passing judgement, I will leave that to those who give a carp.
I'm just wondering why no one ever talks about churros in your threads. That's the real travesty.
So, they replaced Gary Buchanan with that thing (nicest word I could come up with)?
The NFL, NCAA, political parties, country clubs, religions, and any number of other institutions have been doing it for who knows how long. Brand advocates are brand advocates. Even the Spirited threads have brand advocates. I don't think its a good thing or a bad thing. It's a thing. Discussing it, ok. Passing judgement, I will leave that to those who give a carp.
I'm just wondering why no one ever talks about churros in your threads. That's the real travesty.
I'm out of the loop on this one.....?
Because Churros are just nasty.
Because Churros are just nasty.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.