A Spirited Dirty Dozen ...

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Actions speak louder than words. If Iger today said that same statement I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. Walt's actions during the first 11 years of Disneyland's operation while he was alive make that statement from him very believable.

Maybe Bairstow needs to have a li'l chat with Rolly Crump, one of Walt's Imagineers who is still with us. Rolly tells a story about a meeting he took part in where Walt and some of his staff were discussing the Country Bear Jamboree. One of the guys from merchandising kept pressing Walt to put a t-shirt store outside of the attraction. Walt said no. The merch guy kept pressing it ("T-shirts make a lot of money, Walt"). Finally Walt turned to him and said "Mr._, the tail does not wag the dog!"

In other words, Walt was focused on entertainment, not merchandising. Entertainment was the dog. Merchandising was the tail. Those were Walt's priorities. Walt cared about money, but he didn't care about it for himself. He saw money as a means to do things - like invent the theme park. It's important to remember that Disneyland was a terrible risk, but Walt built it anyway, because he believed in the idea, and the idea was not to make a pile of money. He wanted to build a place where entire families could have fun together. And that's of vital importance, because the real "magic" of Disney is Walt's ideals. That's the Disney difference. And people believe in that even now, and it's the best asset the company has, and that's why it's so upsetting to see those ideals sacrificed to improve the bottom line and please stockholders, to see a merchandise guy in charge of the parks. Walt would despise that, I have no doubt.

It's the most craven type of cynicism that believes that every positive thing we've heard about Walt is just company spin. It's also completely false. To believe that Walt was merely a savvy businessman is conjecture. That he was something more has been verified again and again by people who knew him. It's a pity he still needs defending, and worse that he needs defending from so-called fans on a Disney message board.
 

Cesar R M

Well-Known Member
Stepped into a Disney Store yesterday.

They were selling toys for Rogue One.

Toys that weren't meant for 13+.

Doesn't mean the film will end up being bad, but it wouldn't be the first film directed in it's content to sell toys, and we all know how Batman & Robin turned out...
As long we dont get Darth vader with nipples in his armor ;) :hilarious::hilarious::hilarious:
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
Maybe Bairstow needs to have a li'l chat with Rolly Crump, one of Walt's Imagineers who is still with us. Rolly tells a story about a meeting he took part in where Walt and some of his staff were discussing the Country Bear Jamboree. One of the guys from merchandising kept pressing Walt to put a t-shirt store outside of the attraction. Walt said no. The merch guy kept pressing it ("T-shirts make a lot of money, Walt"). Finally Walt turned to him and said "Mr._, the tail does not wag the dog!"

In other words, Walt was focused on entertainment, not merchandising. Entertainment was the dog. Merchandising was the tail. Those were Walt's priorities. Walt cared about money, but he didn't care about it for himself. He saw money as a means to do things - like invent the theme park. It's important to remember that Disneyland was a terrible risk, but Walt built it anyway, because he believed in the idea, and the idea was not to make a pile of money. He wanted to build a place where entire families could have fun together. And that's of vital importance, because the real "magic" of Disney is Walt's ideals. That's the Disney difference. And people believe in that even now, and it's the best asset the company has, and that's why it's so upsetting to see those ideals sacrificed to improve the bottom line and please stockholders, to see a merchandise guy in charge of the parks. Walt would despise that, I have no doubt.

It's the most craven type of cynicism that believes that every positive thing we've heard about Walt is just company spin. It's also completely false. To believe that Walt was merely a savvy businessman is conjecture. That he was something more has been verified again and again by people who knew him. It's a pity he still needs defending, and worse that he needs defending from so-called fans on a Disney message board.


Jeepers, I feel like I've been accused of apostasy.
 

Mike S

Well-Known Member
Jeepers, I feel like I've been accused of apostasy.
c645c90a9e982663dfc591081632ac25.png


Oh yeah, you hate images or whatever.


Good :)
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
I don't hate image macros Mike; I just fail to see the point in reinforcing the groupthink that infects a lot of Disney fan boards by dismissing contrary opinions with.
I would agree, though, that it's probably not going to be productive for me to question the actions of a man that a lot of people revere like some kind of god.
 

Mike S

Well-Known Member
I don't hate image macros Mike; I just fail to see the point in reinforcing the groupthink that infects a lot of Disney fan boards by dismissing contrary opinions with.
I would agree, though, that it's probably not going to be productive for me to question the actions of a man that a lot of people revere like some kind of god.
Not a god. Just a great man who did great things and by all accounts of those that knew him had a very different way of looking at his business than just money and shareholders.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I don't hate image macros Mike; I just fail to see the point in reinforcing the groupthink that infects a lot of Disney fan boards by dismissing contrary opinions with.
I would agree, though, that it's probably not going to be productive for me to question the actions of a man that a lot of people revere like some kind of god.
First, groupthink is a specific phenomenon related to decision making.

You express dismay that your contrary view is not well received when you are the one claiming that there are no differences; that there is only one possible end and only one actual means of achieving that end. Trying to tie it to an irrational reverence for Walt Disney is just an easy way of trying to avoid the decades of commitment and development to the differences you claim cannot be genuine and truthful.
 

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
Stepped into a Disney Store yesterday.

They were selling toys for Rogue One.

Toys that weren't meant for 13+.

Doesn't mean the film will end up being bad, but it wouldn't be the first film directed in it's content to sell toys, and we all know how Batman & Robin turned out...

Heck TFA was nothing more than a Toy Ad - the first trailer showed BB8 and my first thought was a 'Merchandising Movie' because instead of showing something like a battle or the inside of the crashed Superstar Destroyer it showed something which was easily produced as a toy.
 

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
I find it FASCINATING that the whole of corporate america touting that the ONLY duty of a business is to 'Maximize Shareholder Value',

Yet that concept was originated in the mid 1980's by the convicted fraudster Michael Milken aka the 'Junk Bond King' in order to sell below investment grade bonds to finance corporate takeovers.

Speaks to how corporate America's role model is that of a convicted criminal. I'll take dead guy Walt's way of doing business thank you very much.
 
Last edited:

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
Actions speak louder than words. If Iger today said that same statement I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. Walt's actions during the first 11 years of Disneyland's operation while he was alive make that statement from him very believable.

Especially the bit about MBWA or 'Management By Walking Around' where Walt EXPECTED his senior leadership to walk the parks regularly
 

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
I remember stories of Eisner walking the parks too.

Really too bad that he did a complete 180 in the end.

Frank Wells was the guy who kept Eisner's worst instincts in check, Also historically Disney has only fired on 'all cylinders' when there was a 'Creative/Finance pair at the helm' Walt/Roy, Walker/Miller, Eisner/Wells are the periods when Disney experienced its greatest successes.
 

FigmentJedi

Well-Known Member
Heck TFA was nothing more than a Toy Ad - the first trailer showed BB8 and my first thought was a 'Merchandising Movie' because instead of showing something like a battle or the inside of the crashed Superstar Destroyer it showed something which was easily produced as a toy.
Jeepers, a Star Wars movie being an expensive toy ad? Unheard of. :rolleyes:
 
And to make a money, you need customers and an audience. If you're starting to lose customers.. you dont "cost cuts". You give more to make them return and think they have better value now.
That is the difference if now.

Agreed. I've said it several times before on here, but after reading daily about all the cuts at WDW and the price increases on food/merchandise in the face of overpriced park tickets, I can't justify any future trips until this model stops. The value just isn't there for my family and I -even with the 30% off we got at the Polynesian. Even Disneyland/DCA is more appealing for upcoming years.

I've started to express some of this to a friend of mine, who works in WDW's marketing department (I met them on a media trip via my ex that worked in radio promotions and they got me in to see the Cinderella suite in the castle, which was epic.) But I'm saving a full review for them until after I get back. I feel like they need to hear an honest opinion that isn't filtered by survey questions. I want to share just how frustrating planning this trip has been and how I'm already not as excited as I was the past 6 years for my annual trip.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom