A Spirited 15 Rounds ...

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
Agreed on all points. I personally think they are two separate complaints. I have seen quite a few people conflate the two though in their criticism of the movie, that's the root of my comment. Not my personal beliefs, because I do not see how they are related as you point out.

I can relate to the disappointment in the reveal because it is exactly how I felt about Lost's ending. JJ has a way with unfortunately building things up in such a way that when an ultimately potentially bolder and character defining choices are made it's disappointing that it does not exactly add up with how things were telegraphed.

Some good introspection, even if I'm still secretly ticked at Lost.
It's still baffling to me that Disney has already dumped a billion dollars into making and marketing this film trilogy without knowing how the story ends. With decades worth of merchandising and ancillary storytelling at stake, how could, "We'll figure it out when we get there," have been an acceptable answer?
 

AEfx

Well-Known Member
]I know I'm in the minority here, but my opinion is Rogue One was completely unnecessary, as is the Han Solo movie. We knew the Death Star plans were stolen. Did we need to know every detail about how they were stolen? Some stories don't need to be told. They are better off being mysterious, kind of like what happens after "happily ever after".

I don't think Rogue One was necessary, per se, but I did end up liking it. I thought it was overall just a well-done film, and rather cleverly conceived. I really liked that it filled in one of the original plot contrivances of the OT - how they had the technology to build this super-structure yet somehow forgot to cover an exhaust port.

In another way, it helped one of the mistakes of the PT - not really giving a scope to the Rebellion and how deep and complex its origins really were, which has been left up to the ancillary media to fill out because Lucas admittedly "ran out of time" (one of the places where again Padme was crapped upon, as she was one of the founders as you can see in the deleted scene from RotS).

That said, the Solo film seems the antithesis of Rogue One - driven by market research, not a clever idea. Everything about it just seems...off. The timing. The casting. Out of all the rumored characters considered for a stand-alone film, he also really has seemingly the least interesting story, particularly at the time frame they are putting him in. And creatively, I honestly cannot think of another franchise film in history that has seen such turmoil, as has been so well documented.

Who knows, it may turn out to be surprisingly good - but I can't help it, I just have a bad feeling about this...
 

yeti

Well-Known Member
Is it ever explicit in Star Wars that Luke gets the shot off because of the force? My take on all the "force powers" in the first film is that it could all still be in people's heads- it's called a religion. It's not until the second movie that stuff starts to levitate and ghosts appear.

As for Kylo Ren, I thought **** is shown training him, and after that presumably Snoke taught him a thing or two. He's poorly-trained, not untrained like Rey.
That doesn't explain the Jedi mind tricks or Obi Wan completely disappearing when he dies. It's an interesting idea and I'm sure it's at least partially what Lucas was going for - that the force is fickle, mystical, and requires faith instead of reasoning in order for it to manifest physically. But both the first and second movies make it apparent that the force is more than a hokey religion, which implies that Luke wasn't going crazy when he heard Obi Wan's voice in his head, and further implies that he literally "used the force" as a substitute for his targeting computer.

And yeah, you're right about Kylo. I still don't see how he was able to take on the PG if he couldn't even beat Rey last week, but he definitely has a better excuse than she does.
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
That doesn't explain the Jedi mind tricks or Obi Wan completely disappearing when he dies. It's an interesting idea and I'm sure it's at least partially what Lucas was going for - that the force is fickle, mystical, and requires faith instead of reasoning in order for it to manifest physically. But both the first and second movies make it apparent that the force is more than a hokey religion, which implies that Luke wasn't going crazy when he heard Obi Wan's voice in his head, and further implies that he literally "used the force" as a substitute for his targeting computer.

And yeah, you're right about Kylo. I still don't see how he was able to take on the PG if he couldn't even beat Rey last week, but he definitely has a better excuse than she does.
Well presumably, If any of the dudes in red were as good as Kylo, they'd get to be Snoke's special prodigy and Kylo would be the one having to stand along the wall and make the coffee.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It's still baffling to me that Disney has already dumped a billion dollars into making and marketing this film trilogy without knowing how the story ends. With decades worth of merchandising and ancillary storytelling at stake, how could, "We'll figure it out when we get there," have been an acceptable answer?

You answered your own question above...

Because they are chasing quarterlies and bobs retirement parachute...and their philosophy is the brand outweighs the product.

And it did...on their brands that are old and weren't made that way...namely by the Disney's themselves..

The difference here is that while marvel was marginalized...they continued to write the source material the same way they had. The foundation was sound.

Star Wars was not...As much as clone wars did a good job of fleshing out the mess...it was on Cartoon Network and no one saw it.

What did most of the public see? Jar jar repainted in Walmart and reruns on TNT.

Abrams rebooted and dumped the computers...that was important...but the story agenda is kinda a fail. Maybe if Johnson had taken it to another level...but he negated it. And he also has brought too much cgi eye candy back in.
 
Last edited:

AEfx

Well-Known Member
Controversial thought time:

I was just postulating to myself what would the conversation look like if Rey were a male character?

Would a male need to be the son of a famous Jedi to be ultra-powerful, or would we just be content that he was an orphan? Would there be a concern if the male lead were naturally good at fighting/flying? Would our male lead need to be romantically shipped to every single female character the franchise introduced?

I think that was a good question for those that railed against TFA - but not really applicable to what people have expressed about TLJ.

Personally, I was thrilled that a female was going to be a lead. My love of Star Wars is based on the female characters. I have every single Leia action figure ever made (we are honing in on almost 50 just in the 3.75" line), displayed behind glass. I have all the 12" they have made since 1977, including all Sideshow releases. I also have the 2-foot premium statues. I have the corresponding Padme/Amidala stuff, as well, and every female figure that they have released. I also have other Star Wars stuff - but it all relates to scenes Leia or Padme were in - when a new figure comes out, I look at it and say "would this fit into a display with Leia?" (which is why my other "specialty" in collecting is Jabba's Palace stuff).

So when TFA came out, and I saw fans on some Star Wars sites saying things like "Well, I have no problem with female characters, but there has to be a reason for it, not just to be PC," I wanted to strangle them. That's such a stupid statement - basically saying that all characters should be male by default, unless there is a "reason" for them not to be. Those are the kinds of folks that thought TFA was a terrible film and labeled her a "Mary Sue" from the get-go. I also think they were a minority, because the rest of us who are now agreeing that she is pretty much the ultimate "Mary Sue" (which is applied to both genders, although less commonly people call the characters "Gary Stu" or whatever - that was a moniker created for Wesley Crusher) think that they blasted an opportunity to completely turn that on its head.

I know some people seem to disagree, but TFA was set up as a film full of mystery. Rey clearly had memory issues - she wasn't a toddler when she was abandoned, she was a child - can anyone realistically say you wouldn't remember your parents if they had dumped you off somewhere at 6 or 7? And unlike all the male characters you mentioned - they all had backstories. Heck, Bruce Wayne's has been told so many times it's a trope on its own at this point - he fought and trained and used his money to build his gadgets. James Bond was a member of an elite trained special forces division.

Rey just suddenly having the mastery of everything she touches really is the definition of a "Mary Sue". Her gender is really not the issue. The issue is that her character goes against basically everything that has been shown and told in the previous six films about Jedi - how many times did Yoda say "too old..." - he said it about Luke, and even Anakin, who was only 8. I mean, scene after scene in TFA she exhibits these extraordinary abilities she seemingly has mastered. And as I said earlier, the most damning part is - she seems surprised HERSELF. Everything in that film around her points to the fact that she was gifted and trained as a young child - but for whatever reason (given Star Wars, her protection seems most likely), this was blocked from her knowledge and the story of TFA is her starting to recall these things.

If you take that aspect away and say it wasn't there, as some have - then it really is just a terrible Mary Sue story. And that's what TLJ did. While some dismiss it as too obvious - I think that's kind of a cop out, because this isn't M. Night Shamylan here. You can still have hidden stuff and surprises without being illogical. Especially when you see Kylo's huge tantrum once he finds out "the girl" on Jakku is now involved - I don't see how one can come to another conclusion that she was hidden from him to protect her. Or as a weapon against him. The explanation Snoke gives in TLJ about why they care about each other so much before they even meant is just complete weaksauce.

That's why I find the arguments about "well, she didn't need to be anybody" to be kind of silly. No, she didn't, they could have made a different story to begin with - but everything about the story of TFA pointed to her being so, because without it - it just is a terrible film. Not to mention the endless marketing, panels, press conferences, statements, clarifications of statements, etc. that went along with it.

Then you have the other camp who says "well, she probably *is* somebody, you all just want instant gratification" blah blah - in which case, *this* film was terrible because they pretty much laid it all out - Kylo said it, she "searched herself" for it and since she can see so deeply inside of him, it really doesn't make sense to go back to he is lying - and Snoke seemed to confirm this all, as well. So if in the next film, it's all a big "just kidding!" it was just stretched out way too far - for who her parents are to be the entire through-line of three films is just non-inventive and lazy at best.

This is why the whole thing seems like such a mess right now. They have gone and further divided camps - they've lost those of us who wanted the answers to the questions they originally posed, they lost the people who didn't like TFA because they thought it was a Mary Sue story to begin with and could have proven them wrong and made it all make sense, and now they have the people who like what TLJ did who either aren't going to be satisfied if they go back on it, and some who will be if they don't.

It seems easy to just dismiss this all as "well, see, no one would have been happy no matter what they did" - but I just don't buy that. Sure, some people would have fallen into that category, but they are losing people left and right - and no matter how they resolve it, they are going to lose more - when if they had just set forth and told one coherent story, people could have taken it or left it. Star Wars isn't meant to be that deep - the problem is, TLJ tries to suddenly make it that way, by basically turning everything that was set up in TFA on it's head - and clearly, by the divisive way this film has been received - it didn't work.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Rey trained too - it's the self-taught issue people have major, major qualms with. The parentage of course does not excuse that plot point. "Ah, so she's Luke's daughter" doesn't explain that away. Unless the hope was for some mind-wipe business.
I would accept Rey being self taught. As I previously mentioned, her piloting skills and knowledge of modifications could come from her working with junk. Maybe she ripped apart the Outrider (now that would be nerd service). Even some of her combat skills seemed somewhat alluded to with her staff. I think these skills could have been better explained in The Force Awakens, even with something like a line of dialogue (e.g. “I used to bullseye womprats in my T-16 back home.”). This “backstory” regarding her skills relates to her origins because it seemed like it was excluded to build mystery around her origins.

I finally finished the second season of Man in the High Castle and it reinforced why I so disliked The Last Jedi. It doesn’t just ignore its immediate predecessor but all eight prior films. There is no significance to the events of the greater part of a century and Johnson tried to create weight with a Red Shirt genocide (wrong franchise!) This is Star Wars but there is no war. The Emperor and Darth Vader are the baddest baddies of the Galaxy, admired by Snoke and Kylo Ren, but even they could not subdue the Outer Rim Territories (who weren’t keen on the Republic either) and took about two decades to shed the vestiges of the Republic. Now Snoke is able to do in a matter of days what Palpatine could not do in a century but is then cut down so easily. Yes, the capital and federal fleet were destroyed but that doesn’t explain the lack of a war (or why Starkiller Base was needed if there is a fleet of dreadnoughts). All of Naboo just said “Oh well.” All of Corellia just said “Oh well.” All of the Yavin system just said “Oh well.” All of Coruscant just said “Oh well”. All of Kashyyyk said “Aarrragghuuhw huurh.” All of Mon Cala said “Oh well.” All of the Alderaan diaspora said “Oh well.” No wonder poor Leia is loosing her cognitive capacity, thinking that the Republic snubbing, Empire ignoring Outer Rim would be the key to stopped the First Order.
 

bcoachable

Well-Known Member
Who knows, it may turn out to be surprisingly good - but I can't help it, I just have a bad feeling about this...[/QUOTE]

I liked this, but only for the last line!
I think (unless it is poorly done) that Han could be a really fun character to follow!
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I would accept Rey being self taught. As I previously mentioned, her piloting skills and knowledge of modifications could come from her working with junk. Maybe she ripped apart the Outrider (now that would be nerd service). Even some of her combat skills seemed somewhat alluded to with her staff. I think these skills could have been better explained in The Force Awakens, even with something like a line of dialogue (e.g. “I used to bullseye womprats in my T-16 back home.”). This “backstory” regarding her skills relates to her origins because it seemed like it was excluded to build mystery around her origins.

I finally finished the second season of Man in the High Castle and it reinforced why I so disliked The Last Jedi. It doesn’t just ignore its immediate predecessor but all eight prior films. There is no significance to the events of the greater part of a century and Johnson tried to create weight with a Red Shirt genocide (wrong franchise!) This is Star Wars but there is no war. The Emperor and Darth Vader are the baddest baddies of the Galaxy, admired by Snoke and Kylo Ren, but even they could not subdue the Outer Rim Territories (who weren’t keen on the Republic either) and took about two decades to shed the vestiges of the Republic. Now Snoke is able to do in a matter of days what Palpatine could not do in a century but is then cut down so easily. Yes, the capital and federal fleet were destroyed but that doesn’t explain the lack of a war (or why Starkiller Base was needed if there is a fleet of dreadnoughts). All of Naboo just said “Oh well.” All of Corellia just said “Oh well.” All of the Yavin system just said “Oh well.” All of Coruscant just said “Oh well”. All of Kashyyyk said “Aarrragghuuhw huurh.” All of Mon Cala said “Oh well.” All of the Alderaan diaspora said “Oh well.” No wonder poor Leia is loosing her cognitive capacity, thinking that the Republic snubbing, Empire ignoring Outer Rim would be the key to stopped the First Order.

In much fewer words...yes...you've captured most of what I FEEL is wrong...

It's been discussed in offices, holiday parties, classrooms...really anywhere where they don't wear mouse ears or pin lanyards...

The actors have commented on it...the business papers and entertainment reporters have mentioned "struggles"...

Even the director started spinning excuses on social media by about the 3rd showing...

But that's ALL made up...penguin has a chart that proves it never existed. It's just 10 or so people on wdw magic that made it all up. This movie is 100% Star Wars and it's what every fan always wanted

(Ok...it's patronizing...but to continually have the other side of the fence blasted in something that is not universally held is just tiring)
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
A scientific study keeps things from being cherry-picked.

There's your lesson for today.

Can a scientific study apply to an exit poll on a movie?!?!?

Hey...I see the critical scoring...and yes, the critics loved it. The user scores are still in prequel territory.

And if you say that the next day...that's pretty easy to dismiss. They haven't risen.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Can a scientific study apply to an exit poll on a movie?!?!?

Two of the polls were done on Friday opening night. They randomize which theaters to stake out and which guests to ask as they leave.

The SurveyMonkey poll was done over the following several days contacting people randomly as scientific polls do.
 

bclane

Well-Known Member
Who knows, it may turn out to be surprisingly good - but I can't help it, I just have a bad feeling about this...

I liked this, but only for the last line!
I think (unless it is poorly done) that Han could be a really fun character to follow!
Same here. I would have never made the decision to make the Solo film over say an Obi-Wan movie or better yet just going back and doing something from the Old Republic era, or even farther back in time still. Or just figure out how to do a Darth Vader movie and give us what so many people really want. But now that they are doing Solo, I'm looking forward to. Hopefully it isn't the train wreck that some people think it will be. I really like Ron Howard, so I have hope.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Two of the polls were done on Friday opening night. They randomize which theaters to stake out and which guests to ask as they leave.

The SurveyMonkey poll was done over the following several days contacting people randomly as scientific polls do.

I believe you...I do. I just wonder if the demographics are skewed opening night/weekend a touch...
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom