Bairstow
Well-Known Member
Considering how many times they have redone super weapons. I wouldn't be surprised if they make the "doomsday" machines or certain weapons of ridiculous power.
Well it's kind of incumbent upon the writing at this point.
If the end of a Star Wars trilogy ends with a huge galaxy-spanning threat being neutralized, it's difficult to do this from a screenwriting perspective without a climactic battle that blows up a great number of them. Without setting up some sort of contrived way of connecting all these far-flung baddies, this means you've got to blow up a planet, huge super-weapon, or other central mcguffin to communicate to the audience that threat has been met and defeated.
Superhero movies suffer from the same convention. Whenever you raise the stakes to magical/interplanetary end-of-the-world scenarios, they all seem to boil down to a big bad guy using a device to shoot blue energy at the sky while defended by a swarm of robot/insect-like minions that have to be mowed down, final-level-in-a-video-game-style as our heroes are en route to the showdown.
http://observer.com/2016/08/a-quick-word-from-the-giant-sky-beam-in-every-superhero-movie/