RX-24
New Member
Epcot, 2016? It's obvious.
View attachment 69415
Unless Frozestrom is a "Next-gen, larger-than-life, interactive spectacle" (as he says) being talked about since March 2013 , I think not.
Last edited:
Epcot, 2016? It's obvious.
View attachment 69415
No, they'd have closed it anyway. That's what the spreadsheets told them to do.Disney realized they could no longer draw the huge numbers of people ($$$) back without Frozen.
In conclusion, I have no doubt that if the amount of "fans" or people who supposedly supported Maelstrom had been frequenting the ride and the Norway pavilion with the same tenacity,*prior* to Frozen and the announcement of the Maelstrom closing, the attraction would be still be here.
As for the Jerry Rees project, the popular opinion is that he's working on Soarin'.
Would it have been any better if the news source were NBC? Comcast utilized NBC to promote Diagon Alley and Universal. It's what companies do.Always enjoy hearing about how the newest goings on in the fashion world, particularly when on ABC, an obvious neutral arbiter of Disney news. But, you'd know about those promoting the magic....
Middle Eastern Prince to rescue Euro Disney
Saudi billionaire, Prince Alwaleed, says that he will keep his 10pc stake and support the indebted Disney resort's rights issue
Saudi billionaire investor Prince Alwaleed is to back the multi-million rescue deal of Parisian theme park Euro Disney.
Disneyland Paris last week revealed that it needed €1bn (£784m) bail out to help tackle its crippling debt pile.
Walt Disney Company, which owns a 39.8pc stake in the business, said that it would back the €420m rights issue which will improve the cash position of the Paris business by €250m (£196m). In addition, around €600m (£470m) of the group’s debt owed to Walt Disney will be converted into equity.
Prince Alwaleed, who is the second largest investor in Euro Disney, said that he will also support the rights issue. The Saudi billionaire owns a 10pc stake in the theme park on the outskirts of Paris through his Kingdom Holdings investment company.
Prince Al-Waleed and his wife Princess Amira
“We will fully subscribe to the rights issue because we support France and we support Disney,” Prince Alwaleed told theMail on Sunday. “They will not take our stake, we will maintain 10pc”, he said.
Prince Alwaleed famously sued Forbes magazine for suggesting in its world’s billionaire richlist that he was worth only $20bn (£12.5bn).
The grandson of the founder of Saudi Arabia has not made his wealth from oil or inheritance but instead has built up significant stakes in trophy assets such as tech giant Apple, US banking group Citi and the Savoy Hotel in London through a large stake in Canary Wharf developer Songbird Estates.
Prince Alwaleed said that he had flown into Euro Disney, which recently built a Ratatouille themed ride, and said that he still believed it was a “top-notch tourist destination”.
Shares in Euro Disney plunged over 16pc last week on news of the €1bn refinancing.
Although Euro Disney is Europe's most-visited tourist attraction attendance slipped 6.9pc last year to 14.9m - still nearly as many visitors as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre combined. The French comprise 51pc of all the visitors to Euro Disney, followed by 14pc from the UK.
However, the decrease in attendance left Euro Disney with a €27.5m (£21.5m) operating loss on a revenue of €1.3bn (£1bn) last year.
Euro Disney runs seven hotels and two theme parks, including Disneyland Paris. Soon after it opened, the French theatre director, Ariane Mnouchkine, famously described it as a “cultural Chernobyl”. The French were initially put off by high ticket prices and a ban on alcohol sales, which has since been reversed.
Euro Disney’s next major boost is expected to come in 2016 when it will open a new leisure complex, Villages Nature, in partnership with France’s leading holiday apartment rental company Pierre et Vacances.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/11156949/Walt-Disney-backs-1bn-refinancing-of-Paris-theme-park.html
This is the first time I've heard of Villages Nature.
If Maelstrom was going to "close anyway" -- then why all the fuss over Frozen keeping it going? At least the ride stays open.No, they'd have closed it anyway. That's what the spreadsheets told them to do.
Or they could have done something else if attendence was an issue. Like fix the rest of the park. F&W can't prop it up indefinately.
It's not as if they didn't have plans to keep Maelstrom and give it a full update...
Would it have been any better if the news source were NBC? Comcast utilized NBC to promote Diagon Alley and Universal. It's what companies do.
Remember, a few pages back when I mentioned I was baffled as to why Disney was so eager to bail out Disneyland Paris for the third time. Well, I happen to stumble across the answer, and now it all makes sense to me.
This is the first time I've heard of Villages Nature. http://www.newsdlrp.com/village.pdf
So, basically Disneyland Paris is, in part, implementing WDW's timeshare model. I have to admit that Villages Nature looks so beautiful.
I trust that you will attempt to smile at least once today! Carpe' diem.
I can't imagine that spreadsheets told them that Maelstrom was the least popular attraction in the park. Just that it wasn't popular.No, they'd have closed it anyway. That's what the spreadsheets told them to do.
Or they could have done something else if attendence was an issue. Like fix the rest of the park. F&W can't prop it up indefinately.
It's not as if they didn't have plans to keep Maelstrom and give it a full update...
I can't imagine that spreadsheets told them that Maelstrom was the least popular attraction in the park. Just that it wasn't popular.
It was going to close to be updated. Not to be ripped out and rethemed.If Maelstrom was going to "close anyway" -- then why all the fuss over Frozen keeping it going? At least the ride stays open.
.
When was it supposed to close for the update?It was going to close to be updated. Not to be ripped out and rethemed.
If the company are so desperate for an attendence boost that they ruin further what little purpose and theming Showcase had left then they're in an even worse state that we thought.
They built a whole New Fantasyland for toons. That's where they belong. Unless DHS has some spare room. Funnily enough....
It's been well known for years now.
In part is is a requirement of the original 1980's deal signed with the French Government. So no, it is not DVC led.
When was it supposed to close for the update?
Attendance was never an issue with Maelstrom, it consistently had a 30+ minute wait before frozen was even in theaters. Attendance only became an issue once Frozen was there because of how large the crowds were and the relatively small pavilion had a difficult time handling the massive crowds for the meet and greet.If Maelstrom was going to "close anyway" -- then why all the fuss over Frozen keeping it going? At least the ride stays open.
I don't believe attendance became an "issue" until Frozen. If Disney fixed the rest of the park, what will be there to draw those massive crowds to the back of World Showcase? Maelstrom couldn't achieve what the Frozen accomplished, for almost thirty years.
I remember when we had a plan of attack to ride "Dumbo" first thing in the morning, that was one of the go to rides -- Disney addressed that by adding capacity. If Maelstrom was nearly as popular, I find it hard to believe that today's Disney would be willing to invest upwards of 100 million just because.
Epcot is my least favorite park, so I agree that the park needs a major overhaul -- but, I just don't see it in the cards.
Attendance was never an issue with Maelstrom, it consistently had a 30+ minute wait before frozen was even in theaters. Attendance only became an issue once Frozen was there because of how large the crowds were and the relatively small pavilion had a difficult time handling the massive crowds for the meet and greet.
And you seem to think that there is an attendance issue at EPCOT, you are aware that it is the 5th most visited theme park on the planet right? That was also before Frozen was ever in Norway.
From what I understand with whats been talked about on here a Maelstrom refurb was on the table for years, Disney just didn't want to pay for all of it or even most of it, they wanted a large chunk of it to be paid for by a sponsor or by Norway.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.