Search results

I never once said Universal should get involved, so maybe don’t put words in other people’s mouths. What I did point out, however, is how ridiculously absurd it is to claim that what is happening between Disney and the state government has no bearing on Universal.

I’m not conflating anything. You have stated that an entire politcal party disapproves of how Disney handled this. Such a statement is simply untrue. There are many Republicans who have zero issue with what Disney did.

Wait. So you think that a state government retaliating against a private business that operates theme parks is a situation that has nothing to do with Universal? Please tell me that you are not actually saying that.

Well, I know countless members of the Republican party who think that DeSantis is a total clown and that Disney had every right to speak up for what they believe in. I guess the folks who I know - unlike the ones who you know - just choose to put the constitution, including the First Amendment...

If you think Disney alienated an entire political party, you are simply dead wrong. Perhaps an extreme faction of the party, but nothing even close to the entire party.

I literally just laughed out loud. Thank you for this post!

Newsflash for you, timing goes hand and hand with reason. It’s as if you’ve never even heard of the concept of circumstantial evidence. Wait, you probably haven’t.

Now you are comparing Disney’s special district to the rest of them?! Oh wow, you’re starting to make yourself look a bit foolish. No offense.

Yeah, really solid point. I mean, you’re right, this buffoon was intending all along on getting rid of that totally unjust special district. It was just pure coincidence that he finally got around to doing it at the precise moment that Disney spoke out against legislation. It just simply wasn’t...

Yeah, ok. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Not that anyone here is defending DeSantis (understandably so, given what a clown he is proving himself to be), but I‘m waiting for someone to publicly state what seems so obvious to me, which is, “Hey, Ron, if getting rid of the horrible arrangement between the state and Disney and making sure...

This is an awesome thread idea! Serves to highlight one of the many ways that WDW is such a great place to be!

An arrangement that is mutually beneficial to both sides is not a perk. And losing the benefit of an arrangement can be retaliatory.

Actually, there is no need to speculate as to why. DeSantis is on record multiple times saying exactly why.

I get such a kick out of all the media headlines that proclaim words to the effect of “DeSantis to void the Disney agreement,” as if he or any government body can simply declare a contract void. What the headlines should say is “DeSantis to exhibit more false bravado and claim Disney agreement...

One too many “thens.”

You are simply dead wrong. When a harm is only speculative - which any potential voiding of the agreement is at this point - injunctive relief does not lie. Period, end of story. There is zero injunctive relief available to Disney as of right now.

I was only referring to the potential voiding of the agreement, which has not yet happened and thus is not actionable at this point.

That is correct.

No. You said that if they really think that their case is so ironclad, they don't wait and instead take legal action right now. That statement by you demonstrates a fundamental ignorance of how the law works.