Yeah, I get that, none of this is cut and dry. Your head seems to in the right place, I should respect that considering my biggest beef with this whole situation is that everyone should be working together and respecting each other instead digging their heels in and treating others with opposite...
I agree with some of this, but the vaxx side has taken this holier-than-thou and YOU MUST VAXX OR ELSE mentality that to me just seems way out of touch. People don’t respond to that. People want to make their own decisions, people want to have their opinions heard and people want to be treated...
Not buying the fact that people were against healthy lunches, political leanings aside. Maybe they were against how they were funded or distributed, but not the meals themselves, except for, well, you know, the kids who had to eat them...
It’s percentages. Did I make more on the stock that went up 50 dollars or the stock that went up 5 dollars?
It’s the same as saying South Dakota is doing better than California because SD only had 900 infections vs California’s 1300 (made up numbers). If you only look at raw numbers, then yes...
I bought 1000 shares of a stock at 20 dollars a share. It went up 5 dollars.
At the same time I bought 100 shares of a stock at 200 dollars a share. It went up 50 dollars.
Which stock was the better purchase?
Variables need to be considered also. Liver disease, kidney disease? Family history of something? None of this is linear. That is ‘diving down the rabbit hole’ but still something not to be ignored.