I’m not sure what more you want from me, I openly said I don’t have any hard facts to present and I’m not asking anybody to believe me. We’re not getting any kind of closure on this case, so everybody can make their inferences based on the facts presented to them. This is mine based on what has been presented to me.
The posts you quoted are from August 2019 and today. Nothing has changed about my beliefs between now and yesterday
I’m sorry, is this supposed to make you seem credible? You just parroted whatever came through your messages?
I was fifteen years old and I thought the people I was talking to were credible. You know what happened? Dave said he was in Central Shops, the community trusted Dave, the police report came out saying he wasn't there, and people quit trusting Dave on this story, myself included.
It's a new American goal. As usual, it is successful.
They absolutely still have all the documentation to make a 1:1 replica, just not really a reason to do so. Only a handful of retired figures are kept around because they're historical artifacts they can trot out every once in a while. Buzzy was never particularly iconic, and only now is because of this case. No incentive to revive him.
I have no doubt there was at least one person within Disney who either asked "...who?" when told Buzzy went missing or assumed they were talking about Buzz Lightyear.
But you're still pushing the narrative that the theft possibly never occurred and Disney has had it the whole time -- with no evidence offered.
You seem to be very emotional about this topic. Why is this?
I am, and as mentioned before I really don't care whether anybody believes me or not. I am sharing my belief based on what has been presented to me. There is no evidence to confirm or deny anybody's theories, all we know is that it went missing and a police report was filed.
Nothing I've said has been contradicted by police records, unless you are caught up with posts from half a decade ago which predate police records being made publicly available. I'm also not claiming you know anything other than what's on police records, because I know pulling those records is all you've done regarding this case.
I'll own up to being wrong. I was fed bad info five years ago by people I no longer trust. I'm not sure how you have interpreted anything I've said as dodging accountability. I have spent several years now correcting actual verifiable misinformation on this case, including inaccuracies in the police reports, which is why people see me as a legitimate source of information. It's also why I don't talk in certainties regarding what happened after the figure was removed because we have no certainties other than an investigation took place.
It's out, you can go watch it now. Eager to hear what you think because I know you have spent years saying you're skeptical of it.
Which is it? How are the police reports inaccurate but not contradictory to your claims? What exactly are your current claims?
No one sees you as a legitimate source of information. And if they do, that’s their first mistake.
The clothes police report stated his original red jacket was stolen, which hasn't been in the building since 1989, his rubber hands were stolen, which haven't been in the building since the early 1990s, and that the clothes theft occurred in August when it occurred in July. So yes, the police reports have been wrong.
I will reiterate that I have been attached to this case longer than anybody else here and have been regularly fighting misinformation surrounding it, but nobody's forcing you to believe me. I can back up any claim I state as factual with evidence, and have several times.
It's because they've wanted this to be "their story" for the last six years because they've made some public records requests. It has been a very long history of baseless jabs against me, my friends, and the Stolen Kingdom doc because we haven't been working with them.
I understand your passion for the topic, but let me say this. It is said that because there is no solid, irrefutable evidence that Buzz was stolen there is likewise no irrefutable evidence that he wasn't. You have to find the body, like humans, before you can say that he was taken by someone else. Inuendo and likelihood is not evidence it is just conjecture and circumstantial evidence. My conjecture is that it could be either. It isn't unusual for Disney to do their quick change stuff in the middle of the night, what is unusual is that with a staff on duty cleaning up the parks and making mechanical changes all night long, how could it have been done without anyone seeing or hearing anything. Also, like a mystery show the fact that there were maintenance people around every night of the year that no one would have paid any attention to a pick up or van being present within the park.
He's a journalist, getting emotional is what they do.
Yeah, it feels overly personal and sour gripes that s/he is not the one telling this story. Or, rather, they’ve told their story and no one’s bothered to listen.
When have I ever said this should be “my story?” I never have.
