GoofGoof
Premium Member
That‘s never been the plan and never should be. This will never be linear and will always be based on the situation as it occurs. It has to be. I have said this from day 1. I was the first person to applaud the relaxing of mitigations for fully vaccinated people and I still do. At the time mitigations were relaxed I said if cases ramp up we go back to some mitigations. That’s just common sense to me. The people upset by that would be upset no matter if mitigations are dialed back up or if they never stopped.Many people, including numerous posters here, are taking a no-going-back attitude. They are thinking in overly linear terms and frustrated with or even angry at the prospect of returning to mitigations they'd convinced themselves were behind us. Some of the public messaging, particularly from certain leaders, has encouraged this way of thinking, clouding the uncertainties of the bigger picture and pushing people to view the situation as some sort of neat, unidirectional race. I've found the whole thing profoundly disheartening to watch.
It is clear to me that the overwhelming majority of spread is occurring amongst unvaccinated people. Having a fully vaccinated person wear a mask or avoid public places really doesn’t help much but I also understand that in all practical terms it’s not possible to enforce rules that only unvaccinated people have to wear masks so as a result the only practical way to get unvaccinated people to all wear masks is to make everyone wear one. That happens for the period of time necessary and in places it’s necessary. The problem is in the places most needed it won’t actually happen.