Statistics says the reverse is true from a quantified risk perspective.I’ve been out in the world more than ever this week for work and I’m going to be completely honest... I’m more stressed about possibly developing GBS from the vaccine than I was about catching covid while wearing a mask and being distanced before.
This is an emotional reaction based on a faulty premise. You feel more in control of the mask and the distance. This control gives you the sensation that you’re having a larger impact on the risk reduction. A rare GBS reaction comes with no control, it feels random. The lack of control causes an emotional reaction that the risk is larger than it is. Combined, the emotional reaction is lowering the real risk of infection and increasing the GBS risk so they’re inverted. It feels super real, and scary, but it’s all a fake distortion of the actual risk. You can read all the stats you want and know which is more risky, but it’s the emotional reaction you need to overcome.
It’s the same reason some people are afraid to fly.
Cars: “38,680 people died in motor vehicle traffic crashes in 2020”
Planes: there were 299 fatalities in 2020, up from 257 in 2019.
Driving is quantifiably more dangerous than flying. Yet, people have a sense of control while driving, especially if the are in the drivers seat. When flying, they have no control at all.
It’s all an emotional reaction to the perceived control and risk impacts.
It takes effort, but all the data says the vaccine is less risky than everything else, by a huge enormous margin. Trust the data.