GoofGoof
Premium Member
The part that’s difficult to tell is how many overlap with vaccinated people. So for example the best possible scenario is that Alabama has 30% of the population naturally immune and 33% of the population with at least 1 shot and there is no overlap so 63% of the population is ”immune”. I put it in quotes because technically neither natural infection or vaccination results in 100% of the people immune. 63% could be enough to keep infection trending down. The reality is that there’s definitely some overlap of people who were both naturally infected and also got the vaccine. That reduces the percentage. If we assume a 50/50 split then the percent of people naturally immune and not vaccinated drops to 15% and the total combined “immune drops to 48%. I don’t know if that’s enough to get it done long term. Probably not. When more than half the population is vulnerable to infection an outbreak is likely to happen at some point.That is certainly part of it. We have 30% seroprevalence here. But I still think it likely isn’t quite enough. Time will tell!